Cargando…

The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects

BACKGROUND: Accumulated evidence shows that DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer (HNC) as a major DNA repair gene. However, the results from previous studies have been conflictive and inconsistent. In order t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Shitong, Wu, Sihai, Wang, Minghao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211033060
_version_ 1783725131098488832
author Xia, Shitong
Wu, Sihai
Wang, Minghao
author_facet Xia, Shitong
Wu, Sihai
Wang, Minghao
author_sort Xia, Shitong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulated evidence shows that DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer (HNC) as a major DNA repair gene. However, the results from previous studies have been conflictive and inconsistent. In order to more accurately estimate and integrate the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC risk, we conducted a meta-analysis including 14586 subjects. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, literatures were collected up until September 15, 2020 through multifarious retrieval strategies by searching through electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CNKI. The association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC was analyzed through calculating summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-one studies consisting of 6025 cases and 8561 controls were identified and analyzed. No significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk was found under the allelic (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07, P = 0.35), homozygous (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.81-1.21, P = 0.91), heterozygous (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13, P = 0.91), dominant (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.29, P = 0.67) or recessive (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08, P = 0.35) genetic models in the overall comparison. In addition, subgroup analyses according to tumor site also displayed no significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk. However, subgroup analyses based on ethnicity indicated that HNC risk was significantly related to Arg399Gln genetic heterozygous model (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and dominant model (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.02-1.60, P = 0.04) in Caucasians populations. CONCLUSION: The results from this meta-analysis suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants (Arg/Gln and Arg/Arg+Arg/Gln) may contribute to high HNC risk among Caucasians. Further well-designed studies and larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8293857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82938572021-08-03 The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects Xia, Shitong Wu, Sihai Wang, Minghao Technol Cancer Res Treat Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Accumulated evidence shows that DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer (HNC) as a major DNA repair gene. However, the results from previous studies have been conflictive and inconsistent. In order to more accurately estimate and integrate the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC risk, we conducted a meta-analysis including 14586 subjects. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, literatures were collected up until September 15, 2020 through multifarious retrieval strategies by searching through electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CNKI. The association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC was analyzed through calculating summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-one studies consisting of 6025 cases and 8561 controls were identified and analyzed. No significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk was found under the allelic (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07, P = 0.35), homozygous (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.81-1.21, P = 0.91), heterozygous (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13, P = 0.91), dominant (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.29, P = 0.67) or recessive (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08, P = 0.35) genetic models in the overall comparison. In addition, subgroup analyses according to tumor site also displayed no significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk. However, subgroup analyses based on ethnicity indicated that HNC risk was significantly related to Arg399Gln genetic heterozygous model (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and dominant model (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.02-1.60, P = 0.04) in Caucasians populations. CONCLUSION: The results from this meta-analysis suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants (Arg/Gln and Arg/Arg+Arg/Gln) may contribute to high HNC risk among Caucasians. Further well-designed studies and larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings. SAGE Publications 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8293857/ /pubmed/34278875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211033060 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Xia, Shitong
Wu, Sihai
Wang, Minghao
The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title_full The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title_fullStr The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title_full_unstemmed The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title_short The Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
title_sort association between the xrcc1 arg399gln polymorphism and the risk of head and neck cancer: an updated meta-analysis including 14586 subjects
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8293857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211033060
work_keys_str_mv AT xiashitong theassociationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects
AT wusihai theassociationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects
AT wangminghao theassociationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects
AT xiashitong associationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects
AT wusihai associationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects
AT wangminghao associationbetweenthexrcc1arg399glnpolymorphismandtheriskofheadandneckcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisincluding14586subjects