Cargando…

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, José Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Padalino, Barbara, Pasquali, Paolo, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Spoolder, Hans, Ståhl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, Gubbins, Simon, Stegeman, Jan Arend, Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni, Aznar, Inma, Broglia, Alessandro, Lima, Eliana, Van der Stede, Yves, Zancanaro, Gabriele, Roberts, Helen Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306220
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6707
_version_ 1783725165838860288
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Gubbins, Simon
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
Lima, Eliana
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Roberts, Helen Clare
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Gubbins, Simon
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
Lima, Eliana
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Roberts, Helen Clare
collection PubMed
description EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Classical swine fever (CSF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, details of the model used for answering these questions are presented in this opinion as well as the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Here, several recommendations are given on how to increase the effectiveness of some of the sampling procedures. Based on the average length of the period between virus introduction and the reporting of a CSF suspicion, the monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective. In a similar way, it was recommended that the length of the measures in the protection and surveillance zones were increased from 15 to 25 days in the protection zone and from 30 to 40 days in the surveillance zone. Finally, the analysis of existing Kernels for CSF suggested that the radius of the protection and the surveillance zones comprise 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CSF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82940542021-07-23 Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Gubbins, Simon Stegeman, Jan Arend Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Aznar, Inma Broglia, Alessandro Lima, Eliana Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Roberts, Helen Clare EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Classical swine fever (CSF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, details of the model used for answering these questions are presented in this opinion as well as the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Here, several recommendations are given on how to increase the effectiveness of some of the sampling procedures. Based on the average length of the period between virus introduction and the reporting of a CSF suspicion, the monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective. In a similar way, it was recommended that the length of the measures in the protection and surveillance zones were increased from 15 to 25 days in the protection zone and from 30 to 40 days in the surveillance zone. Finally, the analysis of existing Kernels for CSF suggested that the radius of the protection and the surveillance zones comprise 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CSF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8294054/ /pubmed/34306220 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6707 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Gubbins, Simon
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Aznar, Inma
Broglia, Alessandro
Lima, Eliana
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Roberts, Helen Clare
Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title_full Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title_fullStr Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title_short Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever
title_sort assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: classical swine fever
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34306220
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6707
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT gortazarschmidtchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT sihvonenliisahelena assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT spoolderhans assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT velardeantonio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT gubbinssimon assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT stegemanjanarend assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT antoniousotiriaeleni assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT aznarinma assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT brogliaalessandro assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT limaeliana assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT vanderstedeyves assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT zancanarogabriele assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever
AT robertshelenclare assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawclassicalswinefever