Cargando…

Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations

User-generated online reviews have become essential sources of information for potential consumers. Given the increasing importance of online reviews on consumer purchases, some traders try to publish or promote fake reviews on online platforms to improve the reputation of their goods or services, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Martínez Otero, Juan María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34693332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00193-8
_version_ 1783725191235371008
author Martínez Otero, Juan María
author_facet Martínez Otero, Juan María
author_sort Martínez Otero, Juan María
collection PubMed
description User-generated online reviews have become essential sources of information for potential consumers. Given the increasing importance of online reviews on consumer purchases, some traders try to publish or promote fake reviews on online platforms to improve the reputation of their goods or services, or to damage the reputation of their competitors. This paper aims (1) to analyse whether and how fake reviews violate the main legal and ethical principles of advertising, according to the legislations of the US, UK and EU as well as the International Advertising and Marketing Communications Code; (2) to assess how the EU, the UK and the US are dealing with them, and find out which approaches and actions are working best; and (3) to offer normative recommendations for effective prosecution of fake reviews. The paper uses a combination of theoretical and sociological approaches (section 1), black letter analysis of law (sections 2 and 3) and a comparative approach (sections 2 and 3). Among others, the article observes (1) that fake reviews are a form of illegal advertising and (2) that the European regulatory instruments provide more protection against fake reviews than the US and argues (3) that an effective fight against fake reviews requires strong administrative bodies, endowed with sufficient resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82942342021-07-21 Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations Martínez Otero, Juan María SN Soc Sci Review Paper User-generated online reviews have become essential sources of information for potential consumers. Given the increasing importance of online reviews on consumer purchases, some traders try to publish or promote fake reviews on online platforms to improve the reputation of their goods or services, or to damage the reputation of their competitors. This paper aims (1) to analyse whether and how fake reviews violate the main legal and ethical principles of advertising, according to the legislations of the US, UK and EU as well as the International Advertising and Marketing Communications Code; (2) to assess how the EU, the UK and the US are dealing with them, and find out which approaches and actions are working best; and (3) to offer normative recommendations for effective prosecution of fake reviews. The paper uses a combination of theoretical and sociological approaches (section 1), black letter analysis of law (sections 2 and 3) and a comparative approach (sections 2 and 3). Among others, the article observes (1) that fake reviews are a form of illegal advertising and (2) that the European regulatory instruments provide more protection against fake reviews than the US and argues (3) that an effective fight against fake reviews requires strong administrative bodies, endowed with sufficient resources. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8294234/ /pubmed/34693332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00193-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Martínez Otero, Juan María
Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title_full Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title_fullStr Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title_full_unstemmed Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title_short Fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the US, UK and EU legislations
title_sort fake reviews on online platforms: perspectives from the us, uk and eu legislations
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34693332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00193-8
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezoterojuanmaria fakereviewsononlineplatformsperspectivesfromtheusukandeulegislations