Cargando…
“One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals?
BACKGROUND: Patients suspected to have upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer can be referred directly for investigation; however, at times this may result to inappropriate referrals. This study explores the model of a “one-stop” clinic as an alternative to the direct referral system. The current study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02647-7 |
_version_ | 1783725197521584128 |
---|---|
author | Yiasemidou, Marina Lathan, Ross Lambertz, Manfred Oommen, Chitakattil Chetter, Ian |
author_facet | Yiasemidou, Marina Lathan, Ross Lambertz, Manfred Oommen, Chitakattil Chetter, Ian |
author_sort | Yiasemidou, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients suspected to have upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer can be referred directly for investigation; however, at times this may result to inappropriate referrals. This study explores the model of a “one-stop” clinic as an alternative to the direct referral system. The current study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop UGI clinic and evaluate sensitivity and specificity of “on-the-day” diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of case notes of patients seen in one-stop clinic, between January 2017 and January 2019, was conducted. All General Practitioner (GP) referrals were screened by a specialist nurse. RESULTS: After completion of the post-GP referral screening process, 252 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 58.8–77.3 years; M:F ratio 118:134) were allocated to the one-stop clinic. OGD was not required, contra-indicated or declined in 27 cases (10.7%). The records of three patients could not be found. One patient did not attend. Overall, 221 patients underwent testing and received “on-the-day” diagnoses. Sensitivity was 94% (range 87–100%), and specificity was 92% (88–96%). Ninety-six percent of patients received a diagnosis on the day. CONCLUSIONS: The one-stop clinic was feasible and had good specificity and sensitivity. The finding of 10.7% of cases not being suitable for OGD indicates that a patient/specialist consultation is necessary to prevent misuse of endoscopy appointments. The authors recommend widespread adoption of one-stop clinics in UGI surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8294261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82942612021-07-21 “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? Yiasemidou, Marina Lathan, Ross Lambertz, Manfred Oommen, Chitakattil Chetter, Ian Ir J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients suspected to have upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer can be referred directly for investigation; however, at times this may result to inappropriate referrals. This study explores the model of a “one-stop” clinic as an alternative to the direct referral system. The current study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop UGI clinic and evaluate sensitivity and specificity of “on-the-day” diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of case notes of patients seen in one-stop clinic, between January 2017 and January 2019, was conducted. All General Practitioner (GP) referrals were screened by a specialist nurse. RESULTS: After completion of the post-GP referral screening process, 252 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 58.8–77.3 years; M:F ratio 118:134) were allocated to the one-stop clinic. OGD was not required, contra-indicated or declined in 27 cases (10.7%). The records of three patients could not be found. One patient did not attend. Overall, 221 patients underwent testing and received “on-the-day” diagnoses. Sensitivity was 94% (range 87–100%), and specificity was 92% (88–96%). Ninety-six percent of patients received a diagnosis on the day. CONCLUSIONS: The one-stop clinic was feasible and had good specificity and sensitivity. The finding of 10.7% of cases not being suitable for OGD indicates that a patient/specialist consultation is necessary to prevent misuse of endoscopy appointments. The authors recommend widespread adoption of one-stop clinics in UGI surgery. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8294261/ /pubmed/34286458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02647-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yiasemidou, Marina Lathan, Ross Lambertz, Manfred Oommen, Chitakattil Chetter, Ian “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title | “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title_full | “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title_fullStr | “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title_full_unstemmed | “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title_short | “One stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
title_sort | “one stop” clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer—an alternative to “straight to test” referrals? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02647-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiasemidoumarina onestopclinicforuppergastrointestinalcanceranalternativetostraighttotestreferrals AT lathanross onestopclinicforuppergastrointestinalcanceranalternativetostraighttotestreferrals AT lambertzmanfred onestopclinicforuppergastrointestinalcanceranalternativetostraighttotestreferrals AT oommenchitakattil onestopclinicforuppergastrointestinalcanceranalternativetostraighttotestreferrals AT chetterian onestopclinicforuppergastrointestinalcanceranalternativetostraighttotestreferrals |