Cargando…
Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up
In patients hospitalized for corona virus infectious disease 19 (COVID-19) it is currently unknown whether myocardial function changes after recovery and whether this is related to elevated cardiac biomarkers. In this single center, prospective cohort study we consecutively enrolled hospitalized COV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02346-5 |
_version_ | 1783725200373710848 |
---|---|
author | van den Heuvel, F. M. A. Vos, J. L. van Bakel, B. Duijnhouwer, A. L. van Dijk, A. P. J. Dimitriu-Leen, A. C. Koopmans, P. C. de Mast, Q. van de Veerdonk, F. L. Bosch, F. H. van den Borst, B. Eijsvogels, T. M. H. van Kimmenade, R. R. J. Nijveldt, R. |
author_facet | van den Heuvel, F. M. A. Vos, J. L. van Bakel, B. Duijnhouwer, A. L. van Dijk, A. P. J. Dimitriu-Leen, A. C. Koopmans, P. C. de Mast, Q. van de Veerdonk, F. L. Bosch, F. H. van den Borst, B. Eijsvogels, T. M. H. van Kimmenade, R. R. J. Nijveldt, R. |
author_sort | van den Heuvel, F. M. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In patients hospitalized for corona virus infectious disease 19 (COVID-19) it is currently unknown whether myocardial function changes after recovery and whether this is related to elevated cardiac biomarkers. In this single center, prospective cohort study we consecutively enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients between 1 April and 12 May 2020. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation during hospitalization and at a median of 131 days (IQR; 116–136) follow-up. Of the 51 patients included at baseline, 40 (age: 62 years (IQR; 54–68), 78% male) were available for follow-up TTE. At baseline, 68% of the patients had a normal TTE, regarding left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and function, compared to 83% at follow-up (p = 0.07). Median LV ejection fraction (60% vs. 58%, p = 0.54) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (23 vs 22 mm, p = 0.18) were comparable between hospitalization and follow-up, but a significantly lower RV diameter (39 vs. 34 mm, p = 0.002) and trend towards better global longitudinal strain (GLS) (− 18.5% vs − 19.1%, p = 0.07) was found at follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed no relation between patients with and without elevated TroponinT and/or NT-proBNP during hospitalization and myocardial function at follow-up. Although there were no significant differences in individual myocardial function parameters at 4 months follow-up compared to hospitalisation for COVID-19, there was an overall trend towards normalization in myocardial function, predominantly due to a higher rate of normal GLS at follow-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02346-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8294273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82942732021-07-21 Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up van den Heuvel, F. M. A. Vos, J. L. van Bakel, B. Duijnhouwer, A. L. van Dijk, A. P. J. Dimitriu-Leen, A. C. Koopmans, P. C. de Mast, Q. van de Veerdonk, F. L. Bosch, F. H. van den Borst, B. Eijsvogels, T. M. H. van Kimmenade, R. R. J. Nijveldt, R. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper In patients hospitalized for corona virus infectious disease 19 (COVID-19) it is currently unknown whether myocardial function changes after recovery and whether this is related to elevated cardiac biomarkers. In this single center, prospective cohort study we consecutively enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients between 1 April and 12 May 2020. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation during hospitalization and at a median of 131 days (IQR; 116–136) follow-up. Of the 51 patients included at baseline, 40 (age: 62 years (IQR; 54–68), 78% male) were available for follow-up TTE. At baseline, 68% of the patients had a normal TTE, regarding left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and function, compared to 83% at follow-up (p = 0.07). Median LV ejection fraction (60% vs. 58%, p = 0.54) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (23 vs 22 mm, p = 0.18) were comparable between hospitalization and follow-up, but a significantly lower RV diameter (39 vs. 34 mm, p = 0.002) and trend towards better global longitudinal strain (GLS) (− 18.5% vs − 19.1%, p = 0.07) was found at follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed no relation between patients with and without elevated TroponinT and/or NT-proBNP during hospitalization and myocardial function at follow-up. Although there were no significant differences in individual myocardial function parameters at 4 months follow-up compared to hospitalisation for COVID-19, there was an overall trend towards normalization in myocardial function, predominantly due to a higher rate of normal GLS at follow-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-021-02346-5. Springer Netherlands 2021-07-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8294273/ /pubmed/34286449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02346-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van den Heuvel, F. M. A. Vos, J. L. van Bakel, B. Duijnhouwer, A. L. van Dijk, A. P. J. Dimitriu-Leen, A. C. Koopmans, P. C. de Mast, Q. van de Veerdonk, F. L. Bosch, F. H. van den Borst, B. Eijsvogels, T. M. H. van Kimmenade, R. R. J. Nijveldt, R. Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title | Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title_full | Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title_fullStr | Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title_short | Comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for COVID-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
title_sort | comparison between myocardial function assessed by echocardiography during hospitalization for covid-19 and at 4 months follow-up |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02346-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenheuvelfma comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vosjl comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vanbakelb comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT duijnhouweral comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vandijkapj comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT dimitriuleenac comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT koopmanspc comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT demastq comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vandeveerdonkfl comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT boschfh comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vandenborstb comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT eijsvogelstmh comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT vankimmenaderrj comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup AT nijveldtr comparisonbetweenmyocardialfunctionassessedbyechocardiographyduringhospitalizationforcovid19andat4monthsfollowup |