Cargando…

Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Controlled hypotension has been used to reduce bleeding and the need for blood transfusions and provide a satisfactory bloodless surgical field. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we are comparing intravenous (i.v.) dexmedetomidine infusion and oral metoprolol as a premed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahajan, Lakshmi, Singh, Arvinder Pal, Chawla, Sunil, Gill, Sukhman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_19_21
_version_ 1783725231460843520
author Mahajan, Lakshmi
Singh, Arvinder Pal
Chawla, Sunil
Gill, Sukhman
author_facet Mahajan, Lakshmi
Singh, Arvinder Pal
Chawla, Sunil
Gill, Sukhman
author_sort Mahajan, Lakshmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controlled hypotension has been used to reduce bleeding and the need for blood transfusions and provide a satisfactory bloodless surgical field. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we are comparing intravenous (i.v.) dexmedetomidine infusion and oral metoprolol as a premedication for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for evaluating surgical field visibility. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients undergoing FESS were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each. Group A received intraoperative i.v. infusion of dexmedetomidine (loading 1 μg.kg(−1) over 10 min followed by the maintenance of 0.2–0.5 μg.kg(−1).h(−1)), Group B received oral metoprolol 50 mg on night and 2 h before surgery as a premedication, and Group C was taken as a control group and patients received oral placebo tablet as premedication and intraoperative normal saline infusion. General anesthesia was given using sevoflurane. Intraoperative target mean arterial blood pressure was set 55–65 mmHg. Various parameters were recorded and statistically compared. RESULTS: The three groups were statistically comparable in demographics. Quality of surgical field was better in Group A compared to other two groups. Total blood loss was also less in Group A. The incidence of adverse reactions was more in Group A. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine provides a better surgical field compared to oral metoprolol in FESS along with the desired hemodynamics with lesser blood loss and better outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82944232021-08-03 Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study Mahajan, Lakshmi Singh, Arvinder Pal Chawla, Sunil Gill, Sukhman Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Controlled hypotension has been used to reduce bleeding and the need for blood transfusions and provide a satisfactory bloodless surgical field. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we are comparing intravenous (i.v.) dexmedetomidine infusion and oral metoprolol as a premedication for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for evaluating surgical field visibility. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients undergoing FESS were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each. Group A received intraoperative i.v. infusion of dexmedetomidine (loading 1 μg.kg(−1) over 10 min followed by the maintenance of 0.2–0.5 μg.kg(−1).h(−1)), Group B received oral metoprolol 50 mg on night and 2 h before surgery as a premedication, and Group C was taken as a control group and patients received oral placebo tablet as premedication and intraoperative normal saline infusion. General anesthesia was given using sevoflurane. Intraoperative target mean arterial blood pressure was set 55–65 mmHg. Various parameters were recorded and statistically compared. RESULTS: The three groups were statistically comparable in demographics. Quality of surgical field was better in Group A compared to other two groups. Total blood loss was also less in Group A. The incidence of adverse reactions was more in Group A. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine provides a better surgical field compared to oral metoprolol in FESS along with the desired hemodynamics with lesser blood loss and better outcome. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8294423/ /pubmed/34349323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_19_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahajan, Lakshmi
Singh, Arvinder Pal
Chawla, Sunil
Gill, Sukhman
Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title_full Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title_short Premedication for Induced Hypotension in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries: Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion vs Oral Metoprolol vs Placebo: A Comparative Study
title_sort premedication for induced hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgeries: intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion vs oral metoprolol vs placebo: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_19_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mahajanlakshmi premedicationforinducedhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeriesintravenousdexmedetomidineinfusionvsoralmetoprololvsplaceboacomparativestudy
AT singharvinderpal premedicationforinducedhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeriesintravenousdexmedetomidineinfusionvsoralmetoprololvsplaceboacomparativestudy
AT chawlasunil premedicationforinducedhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeriesintravenousdexmedetomidineinfusionvsoralmetoprololvsplaceboacomparativestudy
AT gillsukhman premedicationforinducedhypotensioninfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeriesintravenousdexmedetomidineinfusionvsoralmetoprololvsplaceboacomparativestudy