Cargando…

Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study is to measure the postoperative adequacy of pain relief and functional recovery after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement (TKR) with a multimodal approach. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study don...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Shruti Shrikant, Kane, Deepa, Dhamangaonkar, Anoop, Avhad, Valmik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349319
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_117_20
_version_ 1783725232187506688
author Patil, Shruti Shrikant
Kane, Deepa
Dhamangaonkar, Anoop
Avhad, Valmik
author_facet Patil, Shruti Shrikant
Kane, Deepa
Dhamangaonkar, Anoop
Avhad, Valmik
author_sort Patil, Shruti Shrikant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study is to measure the postoperative adequacy of pain relief and functional recovery after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement (TKR) with a multimodal approach. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study done in a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients aged 18–65 years (yrs) with ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, and III operated for unilateral primary TKR surgery under suitable Anaesthesia and was administered ultrasound-guided adductor canal block + periarticular infiltration (PI) from January 2018 to January 2019 were included. Thereafter, the patients visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest, 45° knee flexion, and mobilization as well as additional analgesia given were noted after going through the records at following time points: 12 hourly for 24 h and thereafter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD2. Level of block, adverse events, and functional recovery (time up and go [TUG] test, 10 s walk test) on POD1 and POD2 were also noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The statistical software namely SPSS 18.0 were used for the analysis of the data. The mean VAS score at 12 h was 4.33 ± 1.3 which worsened at 24 h with steady improvement over the next 2 days. Similarly, the case with a mean VAS score at 45° flexion and on mobilization showed a similar trend. At 12 h postadductor block, besides intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol, 32.6% of patients were given tramadol 50 mg i.v. whereas one patient was given a buprenorphine patch in addition to tramadol. The number of patients requiring additional tramadol and buprenorphine patch steadily increased over the next 2 days. The average time taken for the TUG test at 24 h was 30.98 ± 4.77 s, and the average time taken for the 10 s walk test at 24 h was 6.16 ± 1.10 steps with improvement in performance over the next 2 days. CONCLUSION: In our study, our multimodal analgesia model did not provide satisfactory analgesia though mobilization was not hampered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82944262021-08-03 Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries Patil, Shruti Shrikant Kane, Deepa Dhamangaonkar, Anoop Avhad, Valmik Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study is to measure the postoperative adequacy of pain relief and functional recovery after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement (TKR) with a multimodal approach. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study done in a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients aged 18–65 years (yrs) with ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, and III operated for unilateral primary TKR surgery under suitable Anaesthesia and was administered ultrasound-guided adductor canal block + periarticular infiltration (PI) from January 2018 to January 2019 were included. Thereafter, the patients visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest, 45° knee flexion, and mobilization as well as additional analgesia given were noted after going through the records at following time points: 12 hourly for 24 h and thereafter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD2. Level of block, adverse events, and functional recovery (time up and go [TUG] test, 10 s walk test) on POD1 and POD2 were also noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The statistical software namely SPSS 18.0 were used for the analysis of the data. The mean VAS score at 12 h was 4.33 ± 1.3 which worsened at 24 h with steady improvement over the next 2 days. Similarly, the case with a mean VAS score at 45° flexion and on mobilization showed a similar trend. At 12 h postadductor block, besides intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol, 32.6% of patients were given tramadol 50 mg i.v. whereas one patient was given a buprenorphine patch in addition to tramadol. The number of patients requiring additional tramadol and buprenorphine patch steadily increased over the next 2 days. The average time taken for the TUG test at 24 h was 30.98 ± 4.77 s, and the average time taken for the 10 s walk test at 24 h was 6.16 ± 1.10 steps with improvement in performance over the next 2 days. CONCLUSION: In our study, our multimodal analgesia model did not provide satisfactory analgesia though mobilization was not hampered. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8294426/ /pubmed/34349319 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_117_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patil, Shruti Shrikant
Kane, Deepa
Dhamangaonkar, Anoop
Avhad, Valmik
Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title_full Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title_fullStr Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title_short Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries
title_sort retrospective analysis of pain relief in total knee replacement surgeries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349319
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_117_20
work_keys_str_mv AT patilshrutishrikant retrospectiveanalysisofpainreliefintotalkneereplacementsurgeries
AT kanedeepa retrospectiveanalysisofpainreliefintotalkneereplacementsurgeries
AT dhamangaonkaranoop retrospectiveanalysisofpainreliefintotalkneereplacementsurgeries
AT avhadvalmik retrospectiveanalysisofpainreliefintotalkneereplacementsurgeries