Cargando…

National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)

INTRODUCTION: The donor vigilance program is intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects or reactions resulting from blood donation. In this report, we discuss the analysis of the blood donor adverse reactions (DARs) reported in the National Blood Donor Vigilance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bisht, Akanksha, Marwaha, Neelam, Arora, Satyam, Patidar, Gopal K., Chhabra, Reba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349450
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_195_20
_version_ 1783725233356668928
author Bisht, Akanksha
Marwaha, Neelam
Arora, Satyam
Patidar, Gopal K.
Chhabra, Reba
author_facet Bisht, Akanksha
Marwaha, Neelam
Arora, Satyam
Patidar, Gopal K.
Chhabra, Reba
author_sort Bisht, Akanksha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The donor vigilance program is intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects or reactions resulting from blood donation. In this report, we discuss the analysis of the blood donor adverse reactions (DARs) reported in the National Blood Donor Vigilance Programme of India during the first 2 years of implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DAR reporting form prepared and approved by the National Executive Committee of the Haemovigilance Programme of India was used to capture the data by the blood centers and submitted to Donor-Vigil software prepared and hosted by the official website of the National Institute of Biologicals. Data reported for the years 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, analyzed, and validated by independent transfusion medicine experts. RESULTS: During this period, a total of 19,98,101 donations denominator data were reported, in which 1,622,600 (80.9%) were valid. A total of 6091 DARs were reported, out of which 3980 (65.35%) were found valid. Only validated numerator and denominator data were included in the analysis. Generalized DARs were the most common type of DARs reported (83.7%), followed by “others” type (7.7%), localized (7.6%), allergic (0.4%), and complications related to apheresis (0.4%). The overall DAR rate was 2.45/1000 blood donations, which was higher in apheresis donations (3.07/1000) as compared to whole blood donations (2.39/1000). The DARs rates were higher in females (3.5/1000) compared to male donors (2.3/1000) and in the first time (2.5/1000) compared to repeat donors (2.15/1000). CONCLUSION: In this report, we concluded that younger age, first time, and female donors are more prone to DARs as compared to older age, repeat, and male donors. During the analysis of the data, we found some limitations, which can be improved by upgrading the reporting form and conducting regular continuing medical education (CMEs) of participant blood centers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82944312021-08-03 National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017) Bisht, Akanksha Marwaha, Neelam Arora, Satyam Patidar, Gopal K. Chhabra, Reba Asian J Transfus Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The donor vigilance program is intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects or reactions resulting from blood donation. In this report, we discuss the analysis of the blood donor adverse reactions (DARs) reported in the National Blood Donor Vigilance Programme of India during the first 2 years of implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DAR reporting form prepared and approved by the National Executive Committee of the Haemovigilance Programme of India was used to capture the data by the blood centers and submitted to Donor-Vigil software prepared and hosted by the official website of the National Institute of Biologicals. Data reported for the years 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, analyzed, and validated by independent transfusion medicine experts. RESULTS: During this period, a total of 19,98,101 donations denominator data were reported, in which 1,622,600 (80.9%) were valid. A total of 6091 DARs were reported, out of which 3980 (65.35%) were found valid. Only validated numerator and denominator data were included in the analysis. Generalized DARs were the most common type of DARs reported (83.7%), followed by “others” type (7.7%), localized (7.6%), allergic (0.4%), and complications related to apheresis (0.4%). The overall DAR rate was 2.45/1000 blood donations, which was higher in apheresis donations (3.07/1000) as compared to whole blood donations (2.39/1000). The DARs rates were higher in females (3.5/1000) compared to male donors (2.3/1000) and in the first time (2.5/1000) compared to repeat donors (2.15/1000). CONCLUSION: In this report, we concluded that younger age, first time, and female donors are more prone to DARs as compared to older age, repeat, and male donors. During the analysis of the data, we found some limitations, which can be improved by upgrading the reporting form and conducting regular continuing medical education (CMEs) of participant blood centers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8294431/ /pubmed/34349450 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_195_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bisht, Akanksha
Marwaha, Neelam
Arora, Satyam
Patidar, Gopal K.
Chhabra, Reba
National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title_full National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title_fullStr National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title_full_unstemmed National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title_short National blood donor vigilance programme of India: Analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
title_sort national blood donor vigilance programme of india: analysis of donor adverse reactions reported during initial 2 years of implementation (2016 and 2017)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349450
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_195_20
work_keys_str_mv AT bishtakanksha nationalblooddonorvigilanceprogrammeofindiaanalysisofdonoradversereactionsreportedduringinitial2yearsofimplementation2016and2017
AT marwahaneelam nationalblooddonorvigilanceprogrammeofindiaanalysisofdonoradversereactionsreportedduringinitial2yearsofimplementation2016and2017
AT arorasatyam nationalblooddonorvigilanceprogrammeofindiaanalysisofdonoradversereactionsreportedduringinitial2yearsofimplementation2016and2017
AT patidargopalk nationalblooddonorvigilanceprogrammeofindiaanalysisofdonoradversereactionsreportedduringinitial2yearsofimplementation2016and2017
AT chhabrareba nationalblooddonorvigilanceprogrammeofindiaanalysisofdonoradversereactionsreportedduringinitial2yearsofimplementation2016and2017