Cargando…
Comment on “Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans”
We comment on the technical interpretation of the study of Watson et al. and caution against their conclusion that the behavioral evidence in their experiments points to nonhuman animals’ ability to learn syntactic dependencies, because their results are also consistent with the learning of phonolog...
Autores principales: | Rawski, Jonathan, Idsardi, William, Heinz, Jeffrey |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg0455 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to comment on “Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans”
por: Watson, Stuart K., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans
por: Watson, Stuart K., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comment on “Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready”
por: Lieberman, Philip
Publicado: (2017) -
Response to Lieberman on “Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready”
por: Fitch, W. Tecumseh, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Technical comment on Condamine et al. (2019): a cautionary note for users of linear diversification dependencies
por: Gamisch, Alexander
Publicado: (2020)