Cargando…

Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study

Identifying risk factors is crucial for developing strategies that minimize reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to determine whether certain features of intercondylar notch geometry are associated with failure of physeal-sparing ACLRs in skeletally immatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuca, María, Gausden, Elizabeth, Luderowski, Eva, Valderrama, Ignacio, Pineda, Tomas, Potter, Hollis, Cordasco, Frank, Green, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283039
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00143
_version_ 1783725322458365952
author Tuca, María
Gausden, Elizabeth
Luderowski, Eva
Valderrama, Ignacio
Pineda, Tomas
Potter, Hollis
Cordasco, Frank
Green, Daniel
author_facet Tuca, María
Gausden, Elizabeth
Luderowski, Eva
Valderrama, Ignacio
Pineda, Tomas
Potter, Hollis
Cordasco, Frank
Green, Daniel
author_sort Tuca, María
collection PubMed
description Identifying risk factors is crucial for developing strategies that minimize reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to determine whether certain features of intercondylar notch geometry are associated with failure of physeal-sparing ACLRs in skeletally immature athletes. METHODS: Nine failed physeal-sparing ACLRs were compared with a control subject group of 15 age- and sex-matched intact physeal-sparing ACLRs. Notch width index (NWI), notch angle (NA), and intercondylar notch roof inclination angle (RA) were measured on preoperative MRIs. RESULTS: Median NWI was smaller in the failed ACLR versus control subject group in coronal (0.23 versus 0.27; P < 0.05) and axial planes (0.25 versus 0.27; P = 0.055). Median NA was smaller in the failed ACLR versus control subject group in coronal (49.6 versus 61.0°; P < 0.05) and axial planes (48.6° versus 54.9°; P < 0.05). Median RA was steeper in the failed ACLR versus control subject group (132.0° versus 125.7°; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: NWI, NA, and RA were associated with ACLR failure in skeletally immature patients undergoing physeal-sparing reconstruction. A smaller, narrower, and steeper notch may predispose these patients to reinjury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8294887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82948872021-07-23 Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study Tuca, María Gausden, Elizabeth Luderowski, Eva Valderrama, Ignacio Pineda, Tomas Potter, Hollis Cordasco, Frank Green, Daniel J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Identifying risk factors is crucial for developing strategies that minimize reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to determine whether certain features of intercondylar notch geometry are associated with failure of physeal-sparing ACLRs in skeletally immature athletes. METHODS: Nine failed physeal-sparing ACLRs were compared with a control subject group of 15 age- and sex-matched intact physeal-sparing ACLRs. Notch width index (NWI), notch angle (NA), and intercondylar notch roof inclination angle (RA) were measured on preoperative MRIs. RESULTS: Median NWI was smaller in the failed ACLR versus control subject group in coronal (0.23 versus 0.27; P < 0.05) and axial planes (0.25 versus 0.27; P = 0.055). Median NA was smaller in the failed ACLR versus control subject group in coronal (49.6 versus 61.0°; P < 0.05) and axial planes (48.6° versus 54.9°; P < 0.05). Median RA was steeper in the failed ACLR versus control subject group (132.0° versus 125.7°; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: NWI, NA, and RA were associated with ACLR failure in skeletally immature patients undergoing physeal-sparing reconstruction. A smaller, narrower, and steeper notch may predispose these patients to reinjury. Wolters Kluwer 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8294887/ /pubmed/34283039 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00143 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tuca, María
Gausden, Elizabeth
Luderowski, Eva
Valderrama, Ignacio
Pineda, Tomas
Potter, Hollis
Cordasco, Frank
Green, Daniel
Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title_full Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title_short Stenotic Intercondylar Notch as a Risk Factor for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study
title_sort stenotic intercondylar notch as a risk factor for physeal-sparing acl reconstruction failure: a case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283039
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00143
work_keys_str_mv AT tucamaria stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT gausdenelizabeth stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT luderowskieva stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT valderramaignacio stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT pinedatomas stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT potterhollis stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT cordascofrank stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy
AT greendaniel stenoticintercondylarnotchasariskfactorforphysealsparingaclreconstructionfailureacasecontrolstudy