Cargando…

Outpatient Initiation of Sotalol in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Utility of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices for Therapy Monitoring

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs are often used in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Sotalol is conventionally initiated in the inpatient setting for monitoring efficacy and adverse effects, including QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) proarrhythmia. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mascarenhas, Daniel A. N., Mudumbi, Praveen C., Kantharia, Bharat K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-021-00493-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs are often used in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Sotalol is conventionally initiated in the inpatient setting for monitoring efficacy and adverse effects, including QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) proarrhythmia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient initiation of sotalol for the treatment of AF in a select group of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): permanent pacemakers (PPMs), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and implantable loop recorders (ILRs) capable of continuous rhythm monitoring remotely. METHODS: We conducted our clinical study in a real-world practice setting with longitudinal follow-up of the study cohort. We included adult patients with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent AF eligible for sotalol for rhythm control strategy and who had CIEDs in our study. Patients with a known contraindication to sotalol were excluded. After making a shared management decision with patients, sotalol was initiated as an outpatient, with regular clinical encounters with patients to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment, and monitoring cardiac rhythm and QTc intervals with CIEDs utilizing their remote monitoring platforms. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 105 patients; 38 (36%) females, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 73.9 ± 10.36 years, and with a CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score of 3.26 ± 1.37 and left ventricular ejection fraction of 60.16 ± 9.10%. Twenty-six (24.8%) patients were implanted with PPMs, 10 (9.5%) with dual-chamber ICDs, and 69 (65.7%) with ILRs. Over a follow-up period of 23 ± 15 months, sotalol was continued at a steady median dose of 80 mg twice daily, 105 ± 42 mg (mean ± SD) in 77 (73%) patients who maintained sinus rhythm, and discontinued in 28 (27%) patients because of inefficacy or development of adverse effects. No adverse effects relating to QTc prolongation and TdP or mortality were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and safe outpatient initiation and maintenance of sotalol therapy is possible in select patients who have CIEDs for continuous remote monitoring and surveillance capabilities.