Cargando…

Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales

As attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a feasible target for individuals aiming to procure stimulant medication or accommodations, there is a high clinical need for accurate assessment of adult ADHD. Proven falsifiability of commonly used diagnostic instruments is therefore of concern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becke, Miriam, Tucha, Lara, Weisbrod, Matthias, Aschenbrenner, Steffen, Tucha, Oliver, Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33651237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y
_version_ 1783725373290184704
author Becke, Miriam
Tucha, Lara
Weisbrod, Matthias
Aschenbrenner, Steffen
Tucha, Oliver
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
author_facet Becke, Miriam
Tucha, Lara
Weisbrod, Matthias
Aschenbrenner, Steffen
Tucha, Oliver
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
author_sort Becke, Miriam
collection PubMed
description As attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a feasible target for individuals aiming to procure stimulant medication or accommodations, there is a high clinical need for accurate assessment of adult ADHD. Proven falsifiability of commonly used diagnostic instruments is therefore of concern. The present study aimed to develop a new, ADHD-specific infrequency index to aid the detection of non-credible self-report. Disorder-specific adaptations of four detection strategies were embedded into the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) and tested for infrequency among credible neurotypical controls (n = 1001) and credible adults with ADHD (n = 100). The new index’ ability to detect instructed simulators (n = 242) and non-credible adults with ADHD (n = 22) was subsequently examined using ROC analyses. Applying a conservative cut-off score, the new index identified 30% of participants instructed to simulate ADHD while retaining a specificity of 98%. Items assessing supposed symptoms of ADHD proved most useful in distinguishing genuine patients with ADHD from simulators, whereas inquiries into unusual symptom combinations produced a small effect. The CAARS Infrequency Index (CII) outperformed the new infrequency index in terms of sensitivity (46%), but not overall classification accuracy as determined in ROC analyses. Neither the new infrequency index nor the CII detected non-credible adults diagnosed with ADHD with adequate accuracy. In contrast, both infrequency indices showed high classification accuracy when used to detect symptom over-report. Findings support the new indices’ utility as an adjunct measure in uncovering feigned ADHD, while underscoring the need to differentiate general over-reporting from specific forms of feigning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8295107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82951072021-07-23 Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales Becke, Miriam Tucha, Lara Weisbrod, Matthias Aschenbrenner, Steffen Tucha, Oliver Fuermaier, Anselm B. M. J Neural Transm (Vienna) Psychiatry and Preclinical Psychiatric Studies - Original Article As attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a feasible target for individuals aiming to procure stimulant medication or accommodations, there is a high clinical need for accurate assessment of adult ADHD. Proven falsifiability of commonly used diagnostic instruments is therefore of concern. The present study aimed to develop a new, ADHD-specific infrequency index to aid the detection of non-credible self-report. Disorder-specific adaptations of four detection strategies were embedded into the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) and tested for infrequency among credible neurotypical controls (n = 1001) and credible adults with ADHD (n = 100). The new index’ ability to detect instructed simulators (n = 242) and non-credible adults with ADHD (n = 22) was subsequently examined using ROC analyses. Applying a conservative cut-off score, the new index identified 30% of participants instructed to simulate ADHD while retaining a specificity of 98%. Items assessing supposed symptoms of ADHD proved most useful in distinguishing genuine patients with ADHD from simulators, whereas inquiries into unusual symptom combinations produced a small effect. The CAARS Infrequency Index (CII) outperformed the new infrequency index in terms of sensitivity (46%), but not overall classification accuracy as determined in ROC analyses. Neither the new infrequency index nor the CII detected non-credible adults diagnosed with ADHD with adequate accuracy. In contrast, both infrequency indices showed high classification accuracy when used to detect symptom over-report. Findings support the new indices’ utility as an adjunct measure in uncovering feigned ADHD, while underscoring the need to differentiate general over-reporting from specific forms of feigning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y. Springer Vienna 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8295107/ /pubmed/33651237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Preclinical Psychiatric Studies - Original Article
Becke, Miriam
Tucha, Lara
Weisbrod, Matthias
Aschenbrenner, Steffen
Tucha, Oliver
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title_full Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title_fullStr Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title_full_unstemmed Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title_short Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales
title_sort non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult adhd: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the conners’ adult adhd rating scales
topic Psychiatry and Preclinical Psychiatric Studies - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33651237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02318-y
work_keys_str_mv AT beckemiriam noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales
AT tuchalara noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales
AT weisbrodmatthias noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales
AT aschenbrennersteffen noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales
AT tuchaoliver noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales
AT fuermaieranselmbm noncrediblesymptomreportintheclinicalevaluationofadultadhddevelopmentandinitialvalidationofanewvalidityindexembeddedintheconnersadultadhdratingscales