Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective

BACKGROUND: In the last decades, the number of cancer survivors has increased significantly due to improved treatment and better detection of recurrence. This increased survival redirects the scope from survival towards optimising functional outcomes and improving health-related quality of life (HRQ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graupner, Caitlin, Breukink, S. O., Mul, S., Claessens, D., Slok, A. H. M., Kimman, M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06052-9
_version_ 1783725381497389056
author Graupner, Caitlin
Breukink, S. O.
Mul, S.
Claessens, D.
Slok, A. H. M.
Kimman, M. L.
author_facet Graupner, Caitlin
Breukink, S. O.
Mul, S.
Claessens, D.
Slok, A. H. M.
Kimman, M. L.
author_sort Graupner, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the last decades, the number of cancer survivors has increased significantly due to improved treatment and better detection of recurrence. This increased survival redirects the scope from survival towards optimising functional outcomes and improving health-related quality of life (HRQol). Functional and HRQoL outcomes can be assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the use of PROMs in daily oncological care is not common. This qualitative study investigates the barriers and facilitators of PROM use in an oncological setting, from the perspective of the healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted among Dutch oncological HCPs. Barriers and facilitators of PROM implementation were identified on various levels of the healthcare system (i.e. level of the patient, individual professional, medical team, and healthcare organisation). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were manually analysed by two independent reviewers using a thematic approach. Identified barriers and facilitators were categorised into Grol and Wensing’s framework for changing healthcare practice. RESULTS: Nineteen oncological HCPs working in academic and non-academic hospitals were interviewed. Barriers for PROM implementation were lack of good IT support, lack of knowledge on how to use PROMs, lack of time to complete and interpret PROMs, and a high administrative burden. PROM implementation can be facilitated by providing clear guidance regarding PROM interpretation, evidence that PROMs can save time, and stimulating multidisciplinary teamwork. CONCLUSION: From a HCP point of view, adequately functioning IT technology, sufficient knowledge on PROMs, and dedicated time during the consultation are essential for successful implementation of PROMs in oncological care. Additional local context-specific factors need to be thoroughly addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8295145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82951452021-07-23 Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective Graupner, Caitlin Breukink, S. O. Mul, S. Claessens, D. Slok, A. H. M. Kimman, M. L. Support Care Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: In the last decades, the number of cancer survivors has increased significantly due to improved treatment and better detection of recurrence. This increased survival redirects the scope from survival towards optimising functional outcomes and improving health-related quality of life (HRQol). Functional and HRQoL outcomes can be assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the use of PROMs in daily oncological care is not common. This qualitative study investigates the barriers and facilitators of PROM use in an oncological setting, from the perspective of the healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted among Dutch oncological HCPs. Barriers and facilitators of PROM implementation were identified on various levels of the healthcare system (i.e. level of the patient, individual professional, medical team, and healthcare organisation). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were manually analysed by two independent reviewers using a thematic approach. Identified barriers and facilitators were categorised into Grol and Wensing’s framework for changing healthcare practice. RESULTS: Nineteen oncological HCPs working in academic and non-academic hospitals were interviewed. Barriers for PROM implementation were lack of good IT support, lack of knowledge on how to use PROMs, lack of time to complete and interpret PROMs, and a high administrative burden. PROM implementation can be facilitated by providing clear guidance regarding PROM interpretation, evidence that PROMs can save time, and stimulating multidisciplinary teamwork. CONCLUSION: From a HCP point of view, adequately functioning IT technology, sufficient knowledge on PROMs, and dedicated time during the consultation are essential for successful implementation of PROMs in oncological care. Additional local context-specific factors need to be thoroughly addressed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8295145/ /pubmed/33655412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06052-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Graupner, Caitlin
Breukink, S. O.
Mul, S.
Claessens, D.
Slok, A. H. M.
Kimman, M. L.
Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06052-9
work_keys_str_mv AT graupnercaitlin patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT breukinkso patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT muls patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT claessensd patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT slokahm patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective
AT kimmanml patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinoncologyaqualitativestudyofthehealthcareprofessionalsperspective