Cargando…
Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0 |
_version_ | 1783725383392165888 |
---|---|
author | Ugga, Lorenzo Perillo, Teresa Cuocolo, Renato Stanzione, Arnaldo Romeo, Valeria Green, Roberta Cantoni, Valeria Brunetti, Arturo |
author_facet | Ugga, Lorenzo Perillo, Teresa Cuocolo, Renato Stanzione, Arnaldo Romeo, Valeria Green, Roberta Cantoni, Valeria Brunetti, Arturo |
author_sort | Ugga, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-operative brain MRI. METHODS: Articles published from the year 2000 on radiomics and machine learning applications in brain imaging of meningioma patients were included. Their methodological quality was assessed by three readers with the radiomics quality score, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-reader reproducibility. A meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the preoperative evaluation of meningioma grading was performed and their risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were included in the systematic review, 8 of which were suitable for the meta-analysis. Total (possible range, −8 to 36) and percentage radiomics quality scores were respectively 6.96 ± 4.86 and 19 ± 13% with a moderate to good inter-reader reproducibility (ICC = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals, 95%CI = 0.54–0.88). The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.84–0.93) with a standard error of 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning and radiomics have been proposed for multiple applications in the imaging of meningiomas, with promising results for preoperative lesion grading. However, future studies with adequate standardization and higher methodological quality are required prior to their introduction in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8295153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82951532021-07-23 Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis Ugga, Lorenzo Perillo, Teresa Cuocolo, Renato Stanzione, Arnaldo Romeo, Valeria Green, Roberta Cantoni, Valeria Brunetti, Arturo Neuroradiology Functional Neuroradiology PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-operative brain MRI. METHODS: Articles published from the year 2000 on radiomics and machine learning applications in brain imaging of meningioma patients were included. Their methodological quality was assessed by three readers with the radiomics quality score, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-reader reproducibility. A meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the preoperative evaluation of meningioma grading was performed and their risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were included in the systematic review, 8 of which were suitable for the meta-analysis. Total (possible range, −8 to 36) and percentage radiomics quality scores were respectively 6.96 ± 4.86 and 19 ± 13% with a moderate to good inter-reader reproducibility (ICC = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals, 95%CI = 0.54–0.88). The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.84–0.93) with a standard error of 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning and radiomics have been proposed for multiple applications in the imaging of meningiomas, with promising results for preoperative lesion grading. However, future studies with adequate standardization and higher methodological quality are required prior to their introduction in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8295153/ /pubmed/33649882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Functional Neuroradiology Ugga, Lorenzo Perillo, Teresa Cuocolo, Renato Stanzione, Arnaldo Romeo, Valeria Green, Roberta Cantoni, Valeria Brunetti, Arturo Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title | Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title_full | Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title_short | Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
title_sort | meningioma mri radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis |
topic | Functional Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uggalorenzo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT perilloteresa meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT cuocolorenato meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT stanzionearnaldo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT romeovaleria meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT greenroberta meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT cantonivaleria meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis AT brunettiarturo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis |