Cargando…

Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ugga, Lorenzo, Perillo, Teresa, Cuocolo, Renato, Stanzione, Arnaldo, Romeo, Valeria, Green, Roberta, Cantoni, Valeria, Brunetti, Arturo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0
_version_ 1783725383392165888
author Ugga, Lorenzo
Perillo, Teresa
Cuocolo, Renato
Stanzione, Arnaldo
Romeo, Valeria
Green, Roberta
Cantoni, Valeria
Brunetti, Arturo
author_facet Ugga, Lorenzo
Perillo, Teresa
Cuocolo, Renato
Stanzione, Arnaldo
Romeo, Valeria
Green, Roberta
Cantoni, Valeria
Brunetti, Arturo
author_sort Ugga, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-operative brain MRI. METHODS: Articles published from the year 2000 on radiomics and machine learning applications in brain imaging of meningioma patients were included. Their methodological quality was assessed by three readers with the radiomics quality score, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-reader reproducibility. A meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the preoperative evaluation of meningioma grading was performed and their risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were included in the systematic review, 8 of which were suitable for the meta-analysis. Total (possible range, −8 to 36) and percentage radiomics quality scores were respectively 6.96 ± 4.86 and 19 ± 13% with a moderate to good inter-reader reproducibility (ICC = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals, 95%CI = 0.54–0.88). The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.84–0.93) with a standard error of 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning and radiomics have been proposed for multiple applications in the imaging of meningiomas, with promising results for preoperative lesion grading. However, future studies with adequate standardization and higher methodological quality are required prior to their introduction in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8295153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82951532021-07-23 Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis Ugga, Lorenzo Perillo, Teresa Cuocolo, Renato Stanzione, Arnaldo Romeo, Valeria Green, Roberta Cantoni, Valeria Brunetti, Arturo Neuroradiology Functional Neuroradiology PURPOSE: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-operative brain MRI. METHODS: Articles published from the year 2000 on radiomics and machine learning applications in brain imaging of meningioma patients were included. Their methodological quality was assessed by three readers with the radiomics quality score, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-reader reproducibility. A meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the preoperative evaluation of meningioma grading was performed and their risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were included in the systematic review, 8 of which were suitable for the meta-analysis. Total (possible range, −8 to 36) and percentage radiomics quality scores were respectively 6.96 ± 4.86 and 19 ± 13% with a moderate to good inter-reader reproducibility (ICC = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals, 95%CI = 0.54–0.88). The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.84–0.93) with a standard error of 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning and radiomics have been proposed for multiple applications in the imaging of meningiomas, with promising results for preoperative lesion grading. However, future studies with adequate standardization and higher methodological quality are required prior to their introduction in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8295153/ /pubmed/33649882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Functional Neuroradiology
Ugga, Lorenzo
Perillo, Teresa
Cuocolo, Renato
Stanzione, Arnaldo
Romeo, Valeria
Green, Roberta
Cantoni, Valeria
Brunetti, Arturo
Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title_full Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title_short Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
title_sort meningioma mri radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
topic Functional Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0
work_keys_str_mv AT uggalorenzo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT perilloteresa meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT cuocolorenato meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT stanzionearnaldo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT romeovaleria meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT greenroberta meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT cantonivaleria meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis
AT brunettiarturo meningiomamriradiomicsandmachinelearningsystematicreviewqualityscoreassessmentandmetaanalysis