Cargando…

Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of corneal and biometry measurements obtained with two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) and a partial coherence interferometry-based device. This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients had three consecutive measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Tommy C. Y., Yu, Marco C. Y., Chiu, Vivian, Lai, Gilda, Leung, Christopher K. S., Chan, Poemen P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93999-8
_version_ 1783725417923870720
author Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Yu, Marco C. Y.
Chiu, Vivian
Lai, Gilda
Leung, Christopher K. S.
Chan, Poemen P. M.
author_facet Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Yu, Marco C. Y.
Chiu, Vivian
Lai, Gilda
Leung, Christopher K. S.
Chan, Poemen P. M.
author_sort Chan, Tommy C. Y.
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of corneal and biometry measurements obtained with two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) and a partial coherence interferometry-based device. This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients had three consecutive measurements for ANTERION (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), CASIAII (Tomey, Japan) and IOLMaster500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) on the same visit. Mean keratometry (Km), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) were recorded. Corneal astigmatic measurements were converted into vector components—J0 and J45. Intra-device repeatability and agreements of measurements amongst the devices were evaluated using repeatability coefficients (RCs) and Bland–Altman plots, respectively. All devices demonstrated comparable repeatability for Km (p ≥ 0.138). ANTERION had the lowest RC for J0 amongst the devices (p ≤ 0.039). Systematic difference was found for the Km and J0 obtained with IOLMaster500 compared to either SSOCTs (p ≤ 0.010). The ACD and AL measured by IOLMaster500 showed a higher RC compared with either SSOCTs (p < 0.002). Systematic difference was found in CCT and ACD between the two SSOCTs (p < 0.001), and in AL between ANTERION and IOLMaster500 (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 1.6 µm, 0.022 mm and 0.021 mm, respectively. Both SSOCTs demonstrated smaller test–retest variability for measuring ACD and AL compared with IOLMaster500. There were significant disagreement in keratometry and AL measurements between the SSOCTs and PCI-based device; their measurements should not be considered as interchangeable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8295353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82953532021-07-23 Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer Chan, Tommy C. Y. Yu, Marco C. Y. Chiu, Vivian Lai, Gilda Leung, Christopher K. S. Chan, Poemen P. M. Sci Rep Article To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of corneal and biometry measurements obtained with two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) and a partial coherence interferometry-based device. This is a cross-sectional study. Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients had three consecutive measurements for ANTERION (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), CASIAII (Tomey, Japan) and IOLMaster500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) on the same visit. Mean keratometry (Km), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) were recorded. Corneal astigmatic measurements were converted into vector components—J0 and J45. Intra-device repeatability and agreements of measurements amongst the devices were evaluated using repeatability coefficients (RCs) and Bland–Altman plots, respectively. All devices demonstrated comparable repeatability for Km (p ≥ 0.138). ANTERION had the lowest RC for J0 amongst the devices (p ≤ 0.039). Systematic difference was found for the Km and J0 obtained with IOLMaster500 compared to either SSOCTs (p ≤ 0.010). The ACD and AL measured by IOLMaster500 showed a higher RC compared with either SSOCTs (p < 0.002). Systematic difference was found in CCT and ACD between the two SSOCTs (p < 0.001), and in AL between ANTERION and IOLMaster500 (p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 1.6 µm, 0.022 mm and 0.021 mm, respectively. Both SSOCTs demonstrated smaller test–retest variability for measuring ACD and AL compared with IOLMaster500. There were significant disagreement in keratometry and AL measurements between the SSOCTs and PCI-based device; their measurements should not be considered as interchangeable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8295353/ /pubmed/34290281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93999-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chan, Tommy C. Y.
Yu, Marco C. Y.
Chiu, Vivian
Lai, Gilda
Leung, Christopher K. S.
Chan, Poemen P. M.
Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title_full Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title_fullStr Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title_short Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
title_sort comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93999-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chantommycy comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer
AT yumarcocy comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer
AT chiuvivian comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer
AT laigilda comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer
AT leungchristopherks comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer
AT chanpoemenpm comparisonoftwonovelsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographydevicestoapartialcoherenceinterferometrybasedbiometer