Cargando…
Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants
BACKGROUND: Zygomatic implants have been described as a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe maxillary atrophy in order to avoid bone augmentation procedures. Taking that into account, in these treatments, the key factor is the position of the implant, the virtual surgical planning (VSP)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x |
_version_ | 1783725429234860032 |
---|---|
author | Xing Gao, B. Iglesias-Velázquez, O. G.F. Tresguerres, F. Rodríguez González Cortes, A. F. Tresguerres, I. Ortega Aranegui, R. López-Pintor, R. M. López-Quiles, J. Torres, J. |
author_facet | Xing Gao, B. Iglesias-Velázquez, O. G.F. Tresguerres, F. Rodríguez González Cortes, A. F. Tresguerres, I. Ortega Aranegui, R. López-Pintor, R. M. López-Quiles, J. Torres, J. |
author_sort | Xing Gao, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Zygomatic implants have been described as a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe maxillary atrophy in order to avoid bone augmentation procedures. Taking that into account, in these treatments, the key factor is the position of the implant, the virtual surgical planning (VSP) is widespread among most clinicians before surgery on the patient. However, there are no studies which evaluate the clinical relevance of these VSP. The aim of this study is to determine whether digital planning on zygomatic implants has any influence on the implant dimensions and position, even when performing conventional surgery afterwards. RESULTS: Fourteen zygomatic implants were placed in four patients. Pre-operative and post-operative helicoidal computed tomography were performed to each patient to allow the comparison between the digital planning and the final position of implants. Tridimensional deviation (TD), mesio-distal deviation (MDD), bucco-palatine deviation (BPD), and apico-coronal deviation (ACD) were evaluated as well as angular deviation (AD). Significative differences in apical TD were observed with a mean of 6.114 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.05). Regarding implant position, only implants placed in the area of the first right molar reported significant differences (p < 0.05) for ACD. Also, implant length larger than 45 mm showed BPD significative differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Zygomatic implant surgery is a complex surgical procedure, and although VSP is a useful tool which helps the clinician determine the number and the length of zygomatic implants as well as its proper position, surgical experience is still mandatory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8295422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82954222021-08-05 Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants Xing Gao, B. Iglesias-Velázquez, O. G.F. Tresguerres, F. Rodríguez González Cortes, A. F. Tresguerres, I. Ortega Aranegui, R. López-Pintor, R. M. López-Quiles, J. Torres, J. Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: Zygomatic implants have been described as a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe maxillary atrophy in order to avoid bone augmentation procedures. Taking that into account, in these treatments, the key factor is the position of the implant, the virtual surgical planning (VSP) is widespread among most clinicians before surgery on the patient. However, there are no studies which evaluate the clinical relevance of these VSP. The aim of this study is to determine whether digital planning on zygomatic implants has any influence on the implant dimensions and position, even when performing conventional surgery afterwards. RESULTS: Fourteen zygomatic implants were placed in four patients. Pre-operative and post-operative helicoidal computed tomography were performed to each patient to allow the comparison between the digital planning and the final position of implants. Tridimensional deviation (TD), mesio-distal deviation (MDD), bucco-palatine deviation (BPD), and apico-coronal deviation (ACD) were evaluated as well as angular deviation (AD). Significative differences in apical TD were observed with a mean of 6.114 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.05). Regarding implant position, only implants placed in the area of the first right molar reported significant differences (p < 0.05) for ACD. Also, implant length larger than 45 mm showed BPD significative differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Zygomatic implant surgery is a complex surgical procedure, and although VSP is a useful tool which helps the clinician determine the number and the length of zygomatic implants as well as its proper position, surgical experience is still mandatory. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8295422/ /pubmed/34291352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Xing Gao, B. Iglesias-Velázquez, O. G.F. Tresguerres, F. Rodríguez González Cortes, A. F. Tresguerres, I. Ortega Aranegui, R. López-Pintor, R. M. López-Quiles, J. Torres, J. Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title | Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title_full | Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title_short | Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
title_sort | accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8295422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xinggaob accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT iglesiasvelazquezo accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT gftresguerresf accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT rodriguezgonzalezcortesa accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT ftresguerresi accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT ortegaaraneguir accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT lopezpintorrm accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT lopezquilesj accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants AT torresj accuracyofdigitalplanninginzygomaticimplants |