Cargando…

Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maes-Carballo, Marta, Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda, Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto, Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla, Khan, Khalid Saeed, Martín-Díaz, Manuel, Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411
_version_ 1783725590795255808
author Maes-Carballo, Marta
Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda
Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto
Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Martín-Díaz, Manuel
Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
author_facet Maes-Carballo, Marta
Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda
Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto
Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Martín-Díaz, Manuel
Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
author_sort Maes-Carballo, Marta
collection PubMed
description Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD42021228867) for clinical pathways and integrated breast cancer care processes was conducted through databases and the World Wide Web in February 2021. Duplicate data extraction was performed with 98% reviewer agreement. Seventy-four QIs (QI per document mean: 11; standard deviation: 10.59) were found in 15 documents. The Catalonian document had the highest number of QIs (n = 30). No QI appeared in all the documents. There were 9/74 QIs covering structure (12.16%), 53/74 covering process (71.62%), and 12/74 covering outcome (16.22%). A total of 22/66 (33.33%) process and outcome QIs did not set a minimum standard of care. QIs related to primary care, patient satisfaction, and shared decision making were deficient. Most of the documents established a BC QI standard for compliance, but the high variability hinders the comparison of outcomes. Establishing a consensus-based set of QIs needs urgent attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8296231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82962312021-07-23 Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review Maes-Carballo, Marta Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla Khan, Khalid Saeed Martín-Díaz, Manuel Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD42021228867) for clinical pathways and integrated breast cancer care processes was conducted through databases and the World Wide Web in February 2021. Duplicate data extraction was performed with 98% reviewer agreement. Seventy-four QIs (QI per document mean: 11; standard deviation: 10.59) were found in 15 documents. The Catalonian document had the highest number of QIs (n = 30). No QI appeared in all the documents. There were 9/74 QIs covering structure (12.16%), 53/74 covering process (71.62%), and 12/74 covering outcome (16.22%). A total of 22/66 (33.33%) process and outcome QIs did not set a minimum standard of care. QIs related to primary care, patient satisfaction, and shared decision making were deficient. Most of the documents established a BC QI standard for compliance, but the high variability hinders the comparison of outcomes. Establishing a consensus-based set of QIs needs urgent attention. MDPI 2021-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8296231/ /pubmed/34199302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Maes-Carballo, Marta
Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda
Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto
Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Martín-Díaz, Manuel
Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title_full Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title_short Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
title_sort breast cancer care quality indicators in spain: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411
work_keys_str_mv AT maescarballomarta breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT gomezfandinoyolanda breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT estradalopezcarlosroberto breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT reinosohermidaayla breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT khankhalidsaeed breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT martindiazmanuel breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview
AT buenocavanillasaurora breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview