Cargando…
Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411 |
_version_ | 1783725590795255808 |
---|---|
author | Maes-Carballo, Marta Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla Khan, Khalid Saeed Martín-Díaz, Manuel Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora |
author_facet | Maes-Carballo, Marta Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla Khan, Khalid Saeed Martín-Díaz, Manuel Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora |
author_sort | Maes-Carballo, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD42021228867) for clinical pathways and integrated breast cancer care processes was conducted through databases and the World Wide Web in February 2021. Duplicate data extraction was performed with 98% reviewer agreement. Seventy-four QIs (QI per document mean: 11; standard deviation: 10.59) were found in 15 documents. The Catalonian document had the highest number of QIs (n = 30). No QI appeared in all the documents. There were 9/74 QIs covering structure (12.16%), 53/74 covering process (71.62%), and 12/74 covering outcome (16.22%). A total of 22/66 (33.33%) process and outcome QIs did not set a minimum standard of care. QIs related to primary care, patient satisfaction, and shared decision making were deficient. Most of the documents established a BC QI standard for compliance, but the high variability hinders the comparison of outcomes. Establishing a consensus-based set of QIs needs urgent attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8296231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82962312021-07-23 Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review Maes-Carballo, Marta Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla Khan, Khalid Saeed Martín-Díaz, Manuel Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Breast cancer (BC) management care requires an increment in quality. An initiative to improve the BC quality care is registered, and quality indicators (QIs) are studied. We appraised the appearance of QIs and their standards systematically in Spain. A prospective systematic search (Prospero no: CRD42021228867) for clinical pathways and integrated breast cancer care processes was conducted through databases and the World Wide Web in February 2021. Duplicate data extraction was performed with 98% reviewer agreement. Seventy-four QIs (QI per document mean: 11; standard deviation: 10.59) were found in 15 documents. The Catalonian document had the highest number of QIs (n = 30). No QI appeared in all the documents. There were 9/74 QIs covering structure (12.16%), 53/74 covering process (71.62%), and 12/74 covering outcome (16.22%). A total of 22/66 (33.33%) process and outcome QIs did not set a minimum standard of care. QIs related to primary care, patient satisfaction, and shared decision making were deficient. Most of the documents established a BC QI standard for compliance, but the high variability hinders the comparison of outcomes. Establishing a consensus-based set of QIs needs urgent attention. MDPI 2021-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8296231/ /pubmed/34199302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Maes-Carballo, Marta Gómez-Fandiño, Yolanda Estrada-López, Carlos Roberto Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla Khan, Khalid Saeed Martín-Díaz, Manuel Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title | Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | breast cancer care quality indicators in spain: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maescarballomarta breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT gomezfandinoyolanda breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT estradalopezcarlosroberto breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT reinosohermidaayla breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT khankhalidsaeed breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT martindiazmanuel breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview AT buenocavanillasaurora breastcancercarequalityindicatorsinspainasystematicreview |