Cargando…

Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †

Background: The aim of our study was to examine the performance of two assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Methods: A total of 127 COVID-19 disease contacts from the Infectious Diseases Department were included. Two serological tests were used: SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna, Jelski, Wojciech, Dunaj, Justyna, Mroczko, Barbara, Czupryna, Piotr, Kruszewska, Ewelina, Pancewicz, Sławomir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126497
_version_ 1783725628489465856
author Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna
Jelski, Wojciech
Dunaj, Justyna
Mroczko, Barbara
Czupryna, Piotr
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Pancewicz, Sławomir
author_facet Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna
Jelski, Wojciech
Dunaj, Justyna
Mroczko, Barbara
Czupryna, Piotr
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Pancewicz, Sławomir
author_sort Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of our study was to examine the performance of two assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Methods: A total of 127 COVID-19 disease contacts from the Infectious Diseases Department were included. Two serological tests were used: SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) and LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin). Results: The assays exhibited a 96.85% (123/127 patients) test result agreement. In two cases, the positive results obtained by SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) were negative based on the LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test, and in two cases, negative results from the LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test were positive with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott). Conclusions: Based on the results of our study, we conclude that in population medicine, the assessments of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus based on spike protein or nucleocapsid protein show comparable effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8296394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82963942021-07-23 Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods † Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna Jelski, Wojciech Dunaj, Justyna Mroczko, Barbara Czupryna, Piotr Kruszewska, Ewelina Pancewicz, Sławomir Int J Environ Res Public Health Brief Report Background: The aim of our study was to examine the performance of two assays in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Methods: A total of 127 COVID-19 disease contacts from the Infectious Diseases Department were included. Two serological tests were used: SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) and LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin). Results: The assays exhibited a 96.85% (123/127 patients) test result agreement. In two cases, the positive results obtained by SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott) were negative based on the LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test, and in two cases, negative results from the LIAISON(®) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG CLIA (DiaSorin) test were positive with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA on the Alinity system (Abbott). Conclusions: Based on the results of our study, we conclude that in population medicine, the assessments of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus based on spike protein or nucleocapsid protein show comparable effectiveness. MDPI 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8296394/ /pubmed/34208607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126497 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Moniuszko-Malinowska, Anna
Jelski, Wojciech
Dunaj, Justyna
Mroczko, Barbara
Czupryna, Piotr
Kruszewska, Ewelina
Pancewicz, Sławomir
Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title_full Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title_fullStr Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title_full_unstemmed Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title_short Serology in COVID-19: Comparison of Two Methods †
title_sort serology in covid-19: comparison of two methods †
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126497
work_keys_str_mv AT moniuszkomalinowskaanna serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT jelskiwojciech serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT dunajjustyna serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT mroczkobarbara serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT czuprynapiotr serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT kruszewskaewelina serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods
AT pancewiczsławomir serologyincovid19comparisonoftwomethods