Cargando…
Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the characteristics of scholars who reviewed for predatory or legitimate journals in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics and reviewing and publishing behaviour. DESIGN: Linkage of random samples of predatory journals and legitimate journals of the Cabe...
Autores principales: | Severin, Anna, Strinzel, Michaela, Egger, Matthias, Domingo, Marc, Barros, Tiago |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050270 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cabells Scholarly Analytics
por: Hoffecker, Lilian
Publicado: (2018) -
Cabell's Blacklist: A New Way to Tackle Predatory Journals
por: Das, Soumitra, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Predatory or Legitimate Journals
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh
Publicado: (2017) -
"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
por: Chirico, Francesco
Publicado: (2017) -
Decoupling the scholarly journal
por: Priem, Jason, et al.
Publicado: (2012)