Cargando…

Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis

OBJECTIVES: Timely access to outpatient services is a major issue for public health systems. To address this issue, we aimed to establish the return on investment to the health system of the implementation of an alternative model for access and triage (Specific Timely Appointments for Triage: STAT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snowdon, David A, Harding, Katherine E, Taylor, Nicholas F, Leggat, Sandra G, Kent, Bridie, Lewis, Annie K, Watts, Jennifer J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045096
_version_ 1783725710855110656
author Snowdon, David A
Harding, Katherine E
Taylor, Nicholas F
Leggat, Sandra G
Kent, Bridie
Lewis, Annie K
Watts, Jennifer J
author_facet Snowdon, David A
Harding, Katherine E
Taylor, Nicholas F
Leggat, Sandra G
Kent, Bridie
Lewis, Annie K
Watts, Jennifer J
author_sort Snowdon, David A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Timely access to outpatient services is a major issue for public health systems. To address this issue, we aimed to establish the return on investment to the health system of the implementation of an alternative model for access and triage (Specific Timely Appointments for Triage: STAT) compared with a traditional waitlist model. DESIGN: Using a prospective pre–post design, an economic analysis was completed comparing the health system costs for participants who were referred for community outpatient services post-implementation of STAT with a traditional waitlist comparison group. SETTING: Eight community outpatient services of a health network in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children referred to community outpatient services. INTERVENTIONS: STAT combined targeted activities to reduce the existing waiting list and direct booking of patients into protected assessment appointments. STAT was compared with usual care, in which new patients were placed on a waiting list and offered appointments as space became available. OUTCOMES: Health system costs included STAT implementation costs, outpatient health service use, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions 3 months before and after initial outpatient appointment. Waiting time was the primary outcome. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated from the health system perspective. RESULTS: Data from 557 participants showed a 16.9 days or 29% (p<0.001) reduction in waiting time for first appointment with STAT compared with traditional waitlist. The ICER showed a cost of $A10 (95% CI −19 to 39) per day reduction in waiting time with STAT compared with traditional waitlist. Modelling showed the cost reduced to $A4 (95% CI −25 to 32) per day of reduction in waiting, if reduction in waiting times is sustained for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in waiting time with the introduction of STAT at minimal cost to the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001016527).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8296773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82967732021-08-12 Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis Snowdon, David A Harding, Katherine E Taylor, Nicholas F Leggat, Sandra G Kent, Bridie Lewis, Annie K Watts, Jennifer J BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Timely access to outpatient services is a major issue for public health systems. To address this issue, we aimed to establish the return on investment to the health system of the implementation of an alternative model for access and triage (Specific Timely Appointments for Triage: STAT) compared with a traditional waitlist model. DESIGN: Using a prospective pre–post design, an economic analysis was completed comparing the health system costs for participants who were referred for community outpatient services post-implementation of STAT with a traditional waitlist comparison group. SETTING: Eight community outpatient services of a health network in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children referred to community outpatient services. INTERVENTIONS: STAT combined targeted activities to reduce the existing waiting list and direct booking of patients into protected assessment appointments. STAT was compared with usual care, in which new patients were placed on a waiting list and offered appointments as space became available. OUTCOMES: Health system costs included STAT implementation costs, outpatient health service use, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions 3 months before and after initial outpatient appointment. Waiting time was the primary outcome. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated from the health system perspective. RESULTS: Data from 557 participants showed a 16.9 days or 29% (p<0.001) reduction in waiting time for first appointment with STAT compared with traditional waitlist. The ICER showed a cost of $A10 (95% CI −19 to 39) per day reduction in waiting time with STAT compared with traditional waitlist. Modelling showed the cost reduced to $A4 (95% CI −25 to 32) per day of reduction in waiting, if reduction in waiting times is sustained for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in waiting time with the introduction of STAT at minimal cost to the health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001016527). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8296773/ /pubmed/34290062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045096 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Snowdon, David A
Harding, Katherine E
Taylor, Nicholas F
Leggat, Sandra G
Kent, Bridie
Lewis, Annie K
Watts, Jennifer J
Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title_full Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title_fullStr Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title_short Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
title_sort return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045096
work_keys_str_mv AT snowdondavida returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT hardingkatherinee returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT taylornicholasf returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT leggatsandrag returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT kentbridie returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT lewisanniek returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis
AT wattsjenniferj returnoninvestmentofamodelofaccesscombiningtriagewithinitialmanagementaneconomicanalysis