Cargando…

Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study

The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for the self-protection of healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients at risk of aerosol transmission of infectious agents. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of personal protective equipment on ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-Méndez, María, Otero-Agra, Martín, Fernández-Méndez, Felipe, Martínez-Isasi, Santiago, Santos-Folgar, Myriam, Barcala-Furelos, Roberto, Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137093
_version_ 1783725741906591744
author Fernández-Méndez, María
Otero-Agra, Martín
Fernández-Méndez, Felipe
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Santos-Folgar, Myriam
Barcala-Furelos, Roberto
Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio
author_facet Fernández-Méndez, María
Otero-Agra, Martín
Fernández-Méndez, Felipe
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Santos-Folgar, Myriam
Barcala-Furelos, Roberto
Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio
author_sort Fernández-Méndez, María
collection PubMed
description The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for the self-protection of healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients at risk of aerosol transmission of infectious agents. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of personal protective equipment on physiological parameters during CPR. A randomized, quasi-experimental, crossover design was used. The study was carried out in a training and simulation emergency box and the total sample consisted of 20 healthcare professionals. Two CPR tests were compared with the recommended sequence of 30 chest compressions and 2 ventilations. The duration of each test was 20 min. One of the CPR tests was carried out without using any PPE (CPR_control), i.e., performed with the usual clothing of each rescuer. The other test was carried out using a CPR test with PPE (i.e., CPR_PPE). The main variables of interest were: CPR quality, compressions, ventilations, maximum heart rate, body fluid loss, body temperature, perceived exertion index, comfort, thermal sensation and sweating. The quality of the CPR was similar in both tests. The maximum heart rate was higher in the active intervals (compressions + bag-valve-mask) of the test with PPE. CPR_PPE meant an increase in the perceived effort, temperature at the start of the thermal sensation test, thermal comfort and sweating, as opposed to CPR performed with usual clothing. Performing prolonged resuscitation with PPE did not influence CPR quality, but caused significant physiological demands. Rescuers were more fatigued, sweated more and their thermal comfort was worse. These results suggest that physical preparation should be taken into account when using PPE and protocols for physiological recovery after use should also be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8296930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82969302021-07-23 Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study Fernández-Méndez, María Otero-Agra, Martín Fernández-Méndez, Felipe Martínez-Isasi, Santiago Santos-Folgar, Myriam Barcala-Furelos, Roberto Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for the self-protection of healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients at risk of aerosol transmission of infectious agents. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of personal protective equipment on physiological parameters during CPR. A randomized, quasi-experimental, crossover design was used. The study was carried out in a training and simulation emergency box and the total sample consisted of 20 healthcare professionals. Two CPR tests were compared with the recommended sequence of 30 chest compressions and 2 ventilations. The duration of each test was 20 min. One of the CPR tests was carried out without using any PPE (CPR_control), i.e., performed with the usual clothing of each rescuer. The other test was carried out using a CPR test with PPE (i.e., CPR_PPE). The main variables of interest were: CPR quality, compressions, ventilations, maximum heart rate, body fluid loss, body temperature, perceived exertion index, comfort, thermal sensation and sweating. The quality of the CPR was similar in both tests. The maximum heart rate was higher in the active intervals (compressions + bag-valve-mask) of the test with PPE. CPR_PPE meant an increase in the perceived effort, temperature at the start of the thermal sensation test, thermal comfort and sweating, as opposed to CPR performed with usual clothing. Performing prolonged resuscitation with PPE did not influence CPR quality, but caused significant physiological demands. Rescuers were more fatigued, sweated more and their thermal comfort was worse. These results suggest that physical preparation should be taken into account when using PPE and protocols for physiological recovery after use should also be established. MDPI 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8296930/ /pubmed/34281042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137093 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández-Méndez, María
Otero-Agra, Martín
Fernández-Méndez, Felipe
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Santos-Folgar, Myriam
Barcala-Furelos, Roberto
Rodríguez-Núñez, Antonio
Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_fullStr Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_short Analysis of Physiological Response during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_sort analysis of physiological response during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with personal protective equipment: a randomized crossover study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34281042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137093
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezmendezmaria analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT oteroagramartin analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT fernandezmendezfelipe analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT martinezisasisantiago analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT santosfolgarmyriam analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT barcalafurelosroberto analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT rodrigueznunezantonio analysisofphysiologicalresponseduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithpersonalprotectiveequipmentarandomizedcrossoverstudy