Cargando…

Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size

Background: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length. Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivanova, Vasilena, Chenchev, Ivan, Zlatev, Stefan, Mijiritsky, Eitan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136994
_version_ 1783725809710661632
author Ivanova, Vasilena
Chenchev, Ivan
Zlatev, Stefan
Mijiritsky, Eitan
author_facet Ivanova, Vasilena
Chenchev, Ivan
Zlatev, Stefan
Mijiritsky, Eitan
author_sort Ivanova, Vasilena
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length. Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4 months, a total of 90 implants were placed. CBCT scans were assigned prior to implant placement in order to assess the bone density. During the surgical re-entry, a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Immediately after implant insertion, the primary stability was measured. The secondary stability was measured 4 months after implant placement. Results: Primary stability showed a significant positive linear correlation with bone density (r = 0.471, p < 0.001) as well as with percentage of new bone formation (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). An average significant association of secondary stability with bone density (rs = 0.498, p < 0.001) and percentage of newly formed bone (r = 0.477, p < 0.001) was revealed. The mean values of primary stability in all three implant sizes, regarding the diameter of the implants, were similar (narrow 67.75; standard 66.78; wide 71.21) with no significant difference (p = 0.262). The same tendency was observed for secondary stability (narrow 73.83; standard 75.25; wide 74.93), with no significant difference (p = 0.277). Conclusions: The study revealed a high correlation between primary and secondary implant stability, and bone density, as well as with the percentage of vital bone formation. Implant length and diameter revealed no linear correlation with the implant stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8297224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82972242021-07-23 Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size Ivanova, Vasilena Chenchev, Ivan Zlatev, Stefan Mijiritsky, Eitan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length. Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4 months, a total of 90 implants were placed. CBCT scans were assigned prior to implant placement in order to assess the bone density. During the surgical re-entry, a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Immediately after implant insertion, the primary stability was measured. The secondary stability was measured 4 months after implant placement. Results: Primary stability showed a significant positive linear correlation with bone density (r = 0.471, p < 0.001) as well as with percentage of new bone formation (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). An average significant association of secondary stability with bone density (rs = 0.498, p < 0.001) and percentage of newly formed bone (r = 0.477, p < 0.001) was revealed. The mean values of primary stability in all three implant sizes, regarding the diameter of the implants, were similar (narrow 67.75; standard 66.78; wide 71.21) with no significant difference (p = 0.262). The same tendency was observed for secondary stability (narrow 73.83; standard 75.25; wide 74.93), with no significant difference (p = 0.277). Conclusions: The study revealed a high correlation between primary and secondary implant stability, and bone density, as well as with the percentage of vital bone formation. Implant length and diameter revealed no linear correlation with the implant stability. MDPI 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8297224/ /pubmed/34208849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136994 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ivanova, Vasilena
Chenchev, Ivan
Zlatev, Stefan
Mijiritsky, Eitan
Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title_full Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title_fullStr Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title_short Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size
title_sort correlation between primary, secondary stability, bone density, percentage of vital bone formation and implant size
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136994
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanovavasilena correlationbetweenprimarysecondarystabilitybonedensitypercentageofvitalboneformationandimplantsize
AT chenchevivan correlationbetweenprimarysecondarystabilitybonedensitypercentageofvitalboneformationandimplantsize
AT zlatevstefan correlationbetweenprimarysecondarystabilitybonedensitypercentageofvitalboneformationandimplantsize
AT mijiritskyeitan correlationbetweenprimarysecondarystabilitybonedensitypercentageofvitalboneformationandimplantsize