Cargando…

Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION: Training Basic Life Support saves lives. However, current BLS training approaches are time-consuming and costly. Alternative cost-efficient and effective training methods are highly needed. The present study evaluated whether a video-feedback supported peer-guided Basic Life Support tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sopka, Saša, Hahn, Fabian, Vogt, Lina, Pears, Kim Hannah, Rossaint, Rolf, Rudolph, Jenny, Klasen, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34293034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254923
_version_ 1783725916010053632
author Sopka, Saša
Hahn, Fabian
Vogt, Lina
Pears, Kim Hannah
Rossaint, Rolf
Rudolph, Jenny
Klasen, Martin
author_facet Sopka, Saša
Hahn, Fabian
Vogt, Lina
Pears, Kim Hannah
Rossaint, Rolf
Rudolph, Jenny
Klasen, Martin
author_sort Sopka, Saša
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Training Basic Life Support saves lives. However, current BLS training approaches are time-consuming and costly. Alternative cost-efficient and effective training methods are highly needed. The present study evaluated whether a video-feedback supported peer-guided Basic Life Support training approach achieves similar practical performance as a standard instructor-guided training in laypersons. METHODS: In a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 288 first-year medical students were randomized to two study arms with different Basic Life Support training methods: 1) Standard Instructor Feedback (SIF) or 2) a Peer Video Feedback (PVF). Outcome parameters were objective data for Basic Life Support performance (compression depth and rate) from a resuscitation manikin with recording software as well as overall Basic Life Support performance and subjective confidence. Non-inferiority margins (Δ) for these outcome parameters and sample size calculation were based on previous studies with Standard Instructor Feedback. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were employed to determine significance of non-inferiority. RESULTS: Results confirmed non-inferiority of Peer Video Feedback to Standard Instructor Feedback for compression depth (proportion difference PVF–SIF = 2.9%; 95% CI: -8.2% to 14.1%; Δ = -19%), overall Basic Life Support performance (proportion difference PVF–SIF = 6.7%; 95% CI: 0.0% to 14.3%; Δ = -27%) and subjective confidence for CPR performance (proportion difference PVF–SIF = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.18–0.17; Δ = -0.5) and emergency situations (proportion difference PVF–SIF = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.21–0.18; Δ = -0.5). Results for compression rate were inconclusive. DISCUSSION: Peer Video Feedback achieves comparable results as standard instructor-based training methods. It is an easy-to-apply and cost-efficient alternative to standard Basic Life Support training methods. To improve performance with respect to compression rate, additional implementation of a metronome is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8297748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82977482021-07-31 Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial Sopka, Saša Hahn, Fabian Vogt, Lina Pears, Kim Hannah Rossaint, Rolf Rudolph, Jenny Klasen, Martin PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Training Basic Life Support saves lives. However, current BLS training approaches are time-consuming and costly. Alternative cost-efficient and effective training methods are highly needed. The present study evaluated whether a video-feedback supported peer-guided Basic Life Support training approach achieves similar practical performance as a standard instructor-guided training in laypersons. METHODS: In a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 288 first-year medical students were randomized to two study arms with different Basic Life Support training methods: 1) Standard Instructor Feedback (SIF) or 2) a Peer Video Feedback (PVF). Outcome parameters were objective data for Basic Life Support performance (compression depth and rate) from a resuscitation manikin with recording software as well as overall Basic Life Support performance and subjective confidence. Non-inferiority margins (Δ) for these outcome parameters and sample size calculation were based on previous studies with Standard Instructor Feedback. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were employed to determine significance of non-inferiority. RESULTS: Results confirmed non-inferiority of Peer Video Feedback to Standard Instructor Feedback for compression depth (proportion difference PVF–SIF = 2.9%; 95% CI: -8.2% to 14.1%; Δ = -19%), overall Basic Life Support performance (proportion difference PVF–SIF = 6.7%; 95% CI: 0.0% to 14.3%; Δ = -27%) and subjective confidence for CPR performance (proportion difference PVF–SIF = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.18–0.17; Δ = -0.5) and emergency situations (proportion difference PVF–SIF = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.21–0.18; Δ = -0.5). Results for compression rate were inconclusive. DISCUSSION: Peer Video Feedback achieves comparable results as standard instructor-based training methods. It is an easy-to-apply and cost-efficient alternative to standard Basic Life Support training methods. To improve performance with respect to compression rate, additional implementation of a metronome is recommended. Public Library of Science 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8297748/ /pubmed/34293034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254923 Text en © 2021 Sopka et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sopka, Saša
Hahn, Fabian
Vogt, Lina
Pears, Kim Hannah
Rossaint, Rolf
Rudolph, Jenny
Klasen, Martin
Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title_short Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
title_sort peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34293034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254923
work_keys_str_mv AT sopkasasa peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT hahnfabian peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT vogtlina peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT pearskimhannah peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT rossaintrolf peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT rudolphjenny peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT klasenmartin peervideofeedbackbuildsbasiclifesupportskillsarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial