Cargando…

A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda

INTRODUCTION: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Point...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakumumpa, Henry, Makobu, Kimani, Ntawiha, Wilbrod, Maniple, Everd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254214
_version_ 1783725937353818112
author Zakumumpa, Henry
Makobu, Kimani
Ntawiha, Wilbrod
Maniple, Everd
author_facet Zakumumpa, Henry
Makobu, Kimani
Ntawiha, Wilbrod
Maniple, Everd
author_sort Zakumumpa, Henry
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Points. Facility-based models include Fast Track Drug Refill, Facility Based Group and Facility Based Individual Management. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of these ART delivery models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models. METHODS: Between December 2019 and February 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n = 116) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in differentiated ART models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analysed by thematic approach. RESULTS: Most facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of differentiated ART delivery in 2018. Fast Track Drug Delivery was the most common facility-based model (implemented in 100 or 86% of health facilities). Community Client-Led ART Delivery was the most popular community model (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points had the lowest uptake with only 33 (24.88%) facilities implementing them. By ownership-type, for-profit facilities reported the lowest uptake of differentiated ART models. Barriers to enrolment in community-based models include HIV-related stigma and low enrolment of adult males in community models. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national coverage of differentiated ART delivery models in Uganda. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Interventions for enhancing the uptake of differentiated ART models in for-profit facilities are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8297836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82978362021-07-31 A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda Zakumumpa, Henry Makobu, Kimani Ntawiha, Wilbrod Maniple, Everd PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Since 2017, Uganda has been implementing five differentiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve the quality of HIV care and to achieve health-system efficiencies. Community-based models include Community Client-Led ART Delivery and Community Drug Distribution Points. Facility-based models include Fast Track Drug Refill, Facility Based Group and Facility Based Individual Management. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of these ART delivery models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models. METHODS: Between December 2019 and February 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n = 116) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in differentiated ART models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analysed by thematic approach. RESULTS: Most facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of differentiated ART delivery in 2018. Fast Track Drug Delivery was the most common facility-based model (implemented in 100 or 86% of health facilities). Community Client-Led ART Delivery was the most popular community model (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points had the lowest uptake with only 33 (24.88%) facilities implementing them. By ownership-type, for-profit facilities reported the lowest uptake of differentiated ART models. Barriers to enrolment in community-based models include HIV-related stigma and low enrolment of adult males in community models. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national coverage of differentiated ART delivery models in Uganda. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Interventions for enhancing the uptake of differentiated ART models in for-profit facilities are recommended. Public Library of Science 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8297836/ /pubmed/34292984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254214 Text en © 2021 Zakumumpa et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zakumumpa, Henry
Makobu, Kimani
Ntawiha, Wilbrod
Maniple, Everd
A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title_full A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title_fullStr A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title_short A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
title_sort mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated art delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254214
work_keys_str_mv AT zakumumpahenry amixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT makobukimani amixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT ntawihawilbrod amixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT manipleeverd amixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT zakumumpahenry mixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT makobukimani mixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT ntawihawilbrod mixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda
AT manipleeverd mixedmethodsevaluationoftheuptakeofnoveldifferentiatedartdeliverymodelsinanationalsampleofhealthfacilitiesinuganda