Cargando…

Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes

PURPOSE: Compare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irrgang, James J., Tashman, Scott, Patterson, Charity G., Musahl, Volker, West, Robin, Oostdyk, Alicia, Galvin, Bryan, Poploski, Kathleen, Fu, Freddie H .
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w
_version_ 1783726025201418240
author Irrgang, James J.
Tashman, Scott
Patterson, Charity G.
Musahl, Volker
West, Robin
Oostdyk, Alicia
Galvin, Bryan
Poploski, Kathleen
Fu, Freddie H .
author_facet Irrgang, James J.
Tashman, Scott
Patterson, Charity G.
Musahl, Volker
West, Robin
Oostdyk, Alicia
Galvin, Bryan
Poploski, Kathleen
Fu, Freddie H .
author_sort Irrgang, James J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Compare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and reduced anterior and rotatory laxity compared to SB ACLR. METHODS: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome measures included the IKDC-SKF and KT-1000 (side to side difference) and pivot shift tests. Other secondary outcomes included measures of sports activity and participation, range of motion (ROM) and re-injury. RESULTS: Enrollment in the study was suspended due to patellar fractures related to harvest of the patellar bone plug. At that time, 57 subjects had been randomized (29 DB) and two-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). At 24-month follow-up there were no between-group differences detected for the primary outcomes. Twenty-one (77.8%) DB’s and 20 (83.3%) SB’s reported returning to pre-injury sports 2 years after surgery (n.s) Three subjects (2 DB’s, 5.3% of total) sustained a graft rupture and 5 individuals (4 SB’s, 8.8% of total) had a subsequent meniscus injury. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the early termination of the study, there were no detectable differences in clinical outcome between anatomic SB and DB ACLR when performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in individuals with ACL insertion sites that range from 14 to 18 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8298248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82982482021-07-23 Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes Irrgang, James J. Tashman, Scott Patterson, Charity G. Musahl, Volker West, Robin Oostdyk, Alicia Galvin, Bryan Poploski, Kathleen Fu, Freddie H . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: Compare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and reduced anterior and rotatory laxity compared to SB ACLR. METHODS: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome measures included the IKDC-SKF and KT-1000 (side to side difference) and pivot shift tests. Other secondary outcomes included measures of sports activity and participation, range of motion (ROM) and re-injury. RESULTS: Enrollment in the study was suspended due to patellar fractures related to harvest of the patellar bone plug. At that time, 57 subjects had been randomized (29 DB) and two-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). At 24-month follow-up there were no between-group differences detected for the primary outcomes. Twenty-one (77.8%) DB’s and 20 (83.3%) SB’s reported returning to pre-injury sports 2 years after surgery (n.s) Three subjects (2 DB’s, 5.3% of total) sustained a graft rupture and 5 individuals (4 SB’s, 8.8% of total) had a subsequent meniscus injury. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the early termination of the study, there were no detectable differences in clinical outcome between anatomic SB and DB ACLR when performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in individuals with ACL insertion sites that range from 14 to 18 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8298248/ /pubmed/33970295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee
Irrgang, James J.
Tashman, Scott
Patterson, Charity G.
Musahl, Volker
West, Robin
Oostdyk, Alicia
Galvin, Bryan
Poploski, Kathleen
Fu, Freddie H .
Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title_full Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title_short Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–Part 1: clinical outcomes
title_sort anatomic single vs. double-bundle acl reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial–part 1: clinical outcomes
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w
work_keys_str_mv AT irrgangjamesj anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT tashmanscott anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT pattersoncharityg anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT musahlvolker anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT westrobin anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT oostdykalicia anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT galvinbryan anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT poploskikathleen anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes
AT fufreddieh anatomicsinglevsdoublebundleaclreconstructionarandomizedclinicaltrialpart1clinicaloutcomes