Cargando…
Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil
Microbial community profiling using high-throughput sequencing relies in part on the preservation of the DNA and the effectiveness of the DNA extraction method. This study aimed at understanding to what extent these parameters affect the profiling. We obtained samples treated with and without a pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0 |
_version_ | 1783726040467636224 |
---|---|
author | Iturbe-Espinoza, Paul Brandt, Bernd W. Braster, Martin Bonte, Matthijs Brown, David M. van Spanning, Rob J. M. |
author_facet | Iturbe-Espinoza, Paul Brandt, Bernd W. Braster, Martin Bonte, Matthijs Brown, David M. van Spanning, Rob J. M. |
author_sort | Iturbe-Espinoza, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microbial community profiling using high-throughput sequencing relies in part on the preservation of the DNA and the effectiveness of the DNA extraction method. This study aimed at understanding to what extent these parameters affect the profiling. We obtained samples treated with and without a preservation solution. Also, we compared DNA extraction kits from Qiagen and Zymo-Research. The types of samples were defined strains, both as single species and mixtures, as well as undefined indigenous microbial communities from soil. We show that the use of a preservation solution resulted in substantial changes in the 16S rRNA gene profiles either due to an overrepresentation of Gram-positive bacteria or to an underrepresentation of Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, 16S rRNA gene profiles were substantially different depending on the type of kit that was used for extraction. The kit from Zymo extracted DNA from different types of bacteria in roughly equal amounts. In contrast, the kit from Qiagen preferentially extracted DNA from Gram-negative bacteria while DNA from Gram-positive bacteria was extracted less effectively. These differences in kit performance strongly influenced the interpretation of our microbial ecology studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8298342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82983422021-08-12 Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil Iturbe-Espinoza, Paul Brandt, Bernd W. Braster, Martin Bonte, Matthijs Brown, David M. van Spanning, Rob J. M. Folia Microbiol (Praha) Original Article Microbial community profiling using high-throughput sequencing relies in part on the preservation of the DNA and the effectiveness of the DNA extraction method. This study aimed at understanding to what extent these parameters affect the profiling. We obtained samples treated with and without a preservation solution. Also, we compared DNA extraction kits from Qiagen and Zymo-Research. The types of samples were defined strains, both as single species and mixtures, as well as undefined indigenous microbial communities from soil. We show that the use of a preservation solution resulted in substantial changes in the 16S rRNA gene profiles either due to an overrepresentation of Gram-positive bacteria or to an underrepresentation of Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, 16S rRNA gene profiles were substantially different depending on the type of kit that was used for extraction. The kit from Zymo extracted DNA from different types of bacteria in roughly equal amounts. In contrast, the kit from Qiagen preferentially extracted DNA from Gram-negative bacteria while DNA from Gram-positive bacteria was extracted less effectively. These differences in kit performance strongly influenced the interpretation of our microbial ecology studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0. Springer Netherlands 2021-04-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8298342/ /pubmed/33834428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Iturbe-Espinoza, Paul Brandt, Bernd W. Braster, Martin Bonte, Matthijs Brown, David M. van Spanning, Rob J. M. Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title | Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title_full | Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title_fullStr | Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title_short | Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
title_sort | effects of dna preservation solution and dna extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iturbeespinozapaul effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil AT brandtberndw effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil AT brastermartin effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil AT bontematthijs effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil AT browndavidm effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil AT vanspanningrobjm effectsofdnapreservationsolutionanddnaextractionmethodsonmicrobialcommunityprofilingofsoil |