Cargando…
The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2 |
_version_ | 1783726105344081920 |
---|---|
author | Vrijsen, B. E. L. ten Berg, M. J. Naaktgeboren, C. A. Vis, J. Y. Dijstelbloem, H. M. Westerink, J. Dekker, D. Hoefer, I. E. Haitjema, S. Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R. van Solinge, W. W. Kaasjager, H. A. H. |
author_facet | Vrijsen, B. E. L. ten Berg, M. J. Naaktgeboren, C. A. Vis, J. Y. Dijstelbloem, H. M. Westerink, J. Dekker, D. Hoefer, I. E. Haitjema, S. Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R. van Solinge, W. W. Kaasjager, H. A. H. |
author_sort | Vrijsen, B. E. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. DESIGN: An “on-off” trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. PARTICIPANTS: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87–1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0–69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0–68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL5009 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8298644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82986442021-08-05 The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial Vrijsen, B. E. L. ten Berg, M. J. Naaktgeboren, C. A. Vis, J. Y. Dijstelbloem, H. M. Westerink, J. Dekker, D. Hoefer, I. E. Haitjema, S. Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R. van Solinge, W. W. Kaasjager, H. A. H. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. DESIGN: An “on-off” trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. PARTICIPANTS: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87–1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0–69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0–68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL5009 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-22 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8298644/ /pubmed/33483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vrijsen, B. E. L. ten Berg, M. J. Naaktgeboren, C. A. Vis, J. Y. Dijstelbloem, H. M. Westerink, J. Dekker, D. Hoefer, I. E. Haitjema, S. Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R. van Solinge, W. W. Kaasjager, H. A. H. The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title | The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title_full | The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title_fullStr | The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title_short | The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial |
title_sort | impact of a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing panel in the internal medicine outpatient clinic: a controlled “on-off” trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vrijsenbel theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT tenbergmj theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT naaktgeborenca theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT visjy theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT dijstelbloemhm theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT westerinkj theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT dekkerd theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT hoeferie theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT haitjemas theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT hulsbergenveelkencar theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT vansolingeww theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT kaasjagerhah theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT vrijsenbel impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT tenbergmj impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT naaktgeborenca impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT visjy impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT dijstelbloemhm impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT westerinkj impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT dekkerd impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT hoeferie impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT haitjemas impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT hulsbergenveelkencar impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT vansolingeww impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial AT kaasjagerhah impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial |