Cargando…

The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial

BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vrijsen, B. E. L., ten Berg, M. J., Naaktgeboren, C. A., Vis, J. Y., Dijstelbloem, H. M., Westerink, J., Dekker, D., Hoefer, I. E., Haitjema, S., Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R., van Solinge, W. W., Kaasjager, H. A. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2
_version_ 1783726105344081920
author Vrijsen, B. E. L.
ten Berg, M. J.
Naaktgeboren, C. A.
Vis, J. Y.
Dijstelbloem, H. M.
Westerink, J.
Dekker, D.
Hoefer, I. E.
Haitjema, S.
Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R.
van Solinge, W. W.
Kaasjager, H. A. H.
author_facet Vrijsen, B. E. L.
ten Berg, M. J.
Naaktgeboren, C. A.
Vis, J. Y.
Dijstelbloem, H. M.
Westerink, J.
Dekker, D.
Hoefer, I. E.
Haitjema, S.
Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R.
van Solinge, W. W.
Kaasjager, H. A. H.
author_sort Vrijsen, B. E. L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. DESIGN: An “on-off” trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. PARTICIPANTS: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87–1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0–69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0–68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL5009 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8298644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82986442021-08-05 The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial Vrijsen, B. E. L. ten Berg, M. J. Naaktgeboren, C. A. Vis, J. Y. Dijstelbloem, H. M. Westerink, J. Dekker, D. Hoefer, I. E. Haitjema, S. Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R. van Solinge, W. W. Kaasjager, H. A. H. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. DESIGN: An “on-off” trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. PARTICIPANTS: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87–1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0–69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0–68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL5009 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-22 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8298644/ /pubmed/33483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Vrijsen, B. E. L.
ten Berg, M. J.
Naaktgeboren, C. A.
Vis, J. Y.
Dijstelbloem, H. M.
Westerink, J.
Dekker, D.
Hoefer, I. E.
Haitjema, S.
Hulsbergen-Veelken, C. A. R.
van Solinge, W. W.
Kaasjager, H. A. H.
The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title_full The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title_fullStr The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title_short The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled “On-Off” Trial
title_sort impact of a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing panel in the internal medicine outpatient clinic: a controlled “on-off” trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vrijsenbel theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT tenbergmj theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT naaktgeborenca theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT visjy theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT dijstelbloemhm theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT westerinkj theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT dekkerd theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT hoeferie theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT haitjemas theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT hulsbergenveelkencar theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT vansolingeww theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT kaasjagerhah theimpactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT vrijsenbel impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT tenbergmj impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT naaktgeborenca impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT visjy impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT dijstelbloemhm impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT westerinkj impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT dekkerd impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT hoeferie impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT haitjemas impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT hulsbergenveelkencar impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT vansolingeww impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial
AT kaasjagerhah impactofastandardizedprevisitlaboratorytestingpanelintheinternalmedicineoutpatientclinicacontrolledonofftrial