Cargando…
Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6 |
_version_ | 1783726106051870720 |
---|---|
author | Orelio, Claudia C. Heus, Pauline Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J Spijker, René van Munster, Barbara C. Hooft, Lotty |
author_facet | Orelio, Claudia C. Heus, Pauline Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J Spijker, René van Munster, Barbara C. Hooft, Lotty |
author_sort | Orelio, Claudia C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use. RESULTS: We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18–0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies. DISCUSSION: All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8298652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82986522021-08-05 Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies Orelio, Claudia C. Heus, Pauline Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J Spijker, René van Munster, Barbara C. Hooft, Lotty J Gen Intern Med Review Paper BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use. RESULTS: We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18–0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies. DISCUSSION: All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-02 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8298652/ /pubmed/33532958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Orelio, Claudia C. Heus, Pauline Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J Spijker, René van Munster, Barbara C. Hooft, Lotty Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title | Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title_full | Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title_fullStr | Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title_short | Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies |
title_sort | reducing inappropriate proton pump inhibitors use for stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: systematic review of de-implementation studies |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orelioclaudiac reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies AT heuspauline reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies AT kroesevandierenjudithj reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies AT spijkerrene reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies AT vanmunsterbarbarac reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies AT hooftlotty reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies |