Cargando…

Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orelio, Claudia C., Heus, Pauline, Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J, Spijker, René, van Munster, Barbara C., Hooft, Lotty
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6
_version_ 1783726106051870720
author Orelio, Claudia C.
Heus, Pauline
Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J
Spijker, René
van Munster, Barbara C.
Hooft, Lotty
author_facet Orelio, Claudia C.
Heus, Pauline
Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J
Spijker, René
van Munster, Barbara C.
Hooft, Lotty
author_sort Orelio, Claudia C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use. RESULTS: We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18–0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies. DISCUSSION: All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8298652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82986522021-08-05 Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies Orelio, Claudia C. Heus, Pauline Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J Spijker, René van Munster, Barbara C. Hooft, Lotty J Gen Intern Med Review Paper BACKGROUND: A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use. RESULTS: We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18–0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies. DISCUSSION: All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-02 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8298652/ /pubmed/33532958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Paper
Orelio, Claudia C.
Heus, Pauline
Kroese-van Dieren, Judith J
Spijker, René
van Munster, Barbara C.
Hooft, Lotty
Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title_full Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title_fullStr Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title_short Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
title_sort reducing inappropriate proton pump inhibitors use for stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: systematic review of de-implementation studies
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6
work_keys_str_mv AT orelioclaudiac reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies
AT heuspauline reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies
AT kroesevandierenjudithj reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies
AT spijkerrene reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies
AT vanmunsterbarbarac reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies
AT hooftlotty reducinginappropriateprotonpumpinhibitorsuseforstressulcerprophylaxisinhospitalizedpatientssystematicreviewofdeimplementationstudies