Cargando…

Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a simulation model to train resident physicians in the performance of a median sternotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was used with cardiac surgery staff to develop a 20-point checklist for the safe performance of a median sternotomy. Thirteen junior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vo, Thin Xuan, Juanda, Nadzir, Ngu, Janet, Gawad, Nada, LaBelle, Kathy, Rubens, Fraser D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34317771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.03.007
_version_ 1783726157362888704
author Vo, Thin Xuan
Juanda, Nadzir
Ngu, Janet
Gawad, Nada
LaBelle, Kathy
Rubens, Fraser D.
author_facet Vo, Thin Xuan
Juanda, Nadzir
Ngu, Janet
Gawad, Nada
LaBelle, Kathy
Rubens, Fraser D.
author_sort Vo, Thin Xuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a simulation model to train resident physicians in the performance of a median sternotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was used with cardiac surgery staff to develop a 20-point checklist for the safe performance of a median sternotomy. Thirteen junior cardiac surgery trainees from across Canada participated in this study to assess the simulation model. Trainees performed the sternotomy before and after reviewing an instructional video. Two senior cardiac surgery resident physicians assessed the participants with the checklist during each session. An entry and exit questionnaire was given to the participants to evaluate the simulation model. RESULTS: Participants scored higher after the training (14.3 ± 2.0) compared with before training (8.0 ± 3.1) (P < .001). The mean duration of time for participants to complete the sternotomy was shorter before training (188 ± 52 seconds vs 228 ± 58 seconds; P = .003). The checklist interrater reliability was κ = 0.47 (moderate) for before training and κ = 0.37 (fair) for after training. All study participants rated the simulation sessions as very useful or extremely useful. CONCLUSIONS: Using the simulation model, training video, and checklist, trainees were able to improve their skill in performing a median sternotomy. This improvement was associated with longer times to complete all procedure steps. Rater training may further improve interrater reliability. Our median sternotomy checklist and simulation model can be adopted for the technical skills training of future cardiac surgery trainees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8298924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82989242021-07-26 Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training Vo, Thin Xuan Juanda, Nadzir Ngu, Janet Gawad, Nada LaBelle, Kathy Rubens, Fraser D. JTCVS Tech Adult: Education OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a simulation model to train resident physicians in the performance of a median sternotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was used with cardiac surgery staff to develop a 20-point checklist for the safe performance of a median sternotomy. Thirteen junior cardiac surgery trainees from across Canada participated in this study to assess the simulation model. Trainees performed the sternotomy before and after reviewing an instructional video. Two senior cardiac surgery resident physicians assessed the participants with the checklist during each session. An entry and exit questionnaire was given to the participants to evaluate the simulation model. RESULTS: Participants scored higher after the training (14.3 ± 2.0) compared with before training (8.0 ± 3.1) (P < .001). The mean duration of time for participants to complete the sternotomy was shorter before training (188 ± 52 seconds vs 228 ± 58 seconds; P = .003). The checklist interrater reliability was κ = 0.47 (moderate) for before training and κ = 0.37 (fair) for after training. All study participants rated the simulation sessions as very useful or extremely useful. CONCLUSIONS: Using the simulation model, training video, and checklist, trainees were able to improve their skill in performing a median sternotomy. This improvement was associated with longer times to complete all procedure steps. Rater training may further improve interrater reliability. Our median sternotomy checklist and simulation model can be adopted for the technical skills training of future cardiac surgery trainees. Elsevier 2020-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8298924/ /pubmed/34317771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.03.007 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Education
Vo, Thin Xuan
Juanda, Nadzir
Ngu, Janet
Gawad, Nada
LaBelle, Kathy
Rubens, Fraser D.
Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title_full Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title_fullStr Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title_full_unstemmed Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title_short Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
title_sort development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training
topic Adult: Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8298924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34317771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.03.007
work_keys_str_mv AT vothinxuan developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining
AT juandanadzir developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining
AT ngujanet developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining
AT gawadnada developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining
AT labellekathy developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining
AT rubensfraserd developmentofamediansternotomysimulationmodelforcardiacsurgerytraining