Cargando…

Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: Improving quality of palliative and end of life care in older people’s care homes is essential. Increasing numbers of people die in these settings, yet access to high quality palliative care is not routinely provided. While evidence for models of care are growing, there remains little in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koerner, Jane, Johnston, Nikki, Samara, Juliane, Liu, Wai-Man, Chapman, Michael, Forbat, Liz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34294068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4
_version_ 1783726300712665088
author Koerner, Jane
Johnston, Nikki
Samara, Juliane
Liu, Wai-Man
Chapman, Michael
Forbat, Liz
author_facet Koerner, Jane
Johnston, Nikki
Samara, Juliane
Liu, Wai-Man
Chapman, Michael
Forbat, Liz
author_sort Koerner, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving quality of palliative and end of life care in older people’s care homes is essential. Increasing numbers of people die in these settings, yet access to high quality palliative care is not routinely provided. While evidence for models of care are growing, there remains little insight regarding how to translate evidence-based models into practice. Palliative Care Needs Rounds (hereafter Needs Rounds) have a robust evidence base, for providing palliative care in care homes, reducing resident hospitalisations, improving residents’ quality of death, and increasing staff confidence in caring for dying residents. This study aimed to identify and describe the context and mechanisms of change that facilitate implementation of Needs Rounds in care homes, and enable other services to reap the benefits of the Needs Rounds approach to care provision. METHODS: Qualitative interviews, embedded within a large randomised control trial, were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 staff from 11 care homes using Needs Rounds. The sample included managers, nurses, and care assistants. Staff participated in individual or dyadic semi-structured interviews. Implementation science frameworks and thematic analysis were used to interpret and analyse the data. RESULTS: Contextual factors affecting implementation included facility preparedness for change, leadership, staff knowledge and skills, and organisational policies. Mechanisms of change that facilitated implementation included staff as facilitators, identifying and triaging residents, strategizing knowledge exchange, and changing clinical approaches to care. Care home staff also identified planning and documentation, and shifts in communication. The outcomes reported by staff suggest reductions in hospitalisations and problematic symptoms for residents, improved staff skills and confidence in caring for residents in their last months, weeks and days of life. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of this paper is in offering care homes detailed insights into service contexts and mechanisms of change that will enable them to reap the benefits of Needs Rounds in their own services. The paper thus will support the implementation of an approach to care that has a robust evidence base, for a population under-served by specialist palliative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000080325. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8299598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82995982021-07-28 Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study Koerner, Jane Johnston, Nikki Samara, Juliane Liu, Wai-Man Chapman, Michael Forbat, Liz BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Improving quality of palliative and end of life care in older people’s care homes is essential. Increasing numbers of people die in these settings, yet access to high quality palliative care is not routinely provided. While evidence for models of care are growing, there remains little insight regarding how to translate evidence-based models into practice. Palliative Care Needs Rounds (hereafter Needs Rounds) have a robust evidence base, for providing palliative care in care homes, reducing resident hospitalisations, improving residents’ quality of death, and increasing staff confidence in caring for dying residents. This study aimed to identify and describe the context and mechanisms of change that facilitate implementation of Needs Rounds in care homes, and enable other services to reap the benefits of the Needs Rounds approach to care provision. METHODS: Qualitative interviews, embedded within a large randomised control trial, were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 staff from 11 care homes using Needs Rounds. The sample included managers, nurses, and care assistants. Staff participated in individual or dyadic semi-structured interviews. Implementation science frameworks and thematic analysis were used to interpret and analyse the data. RESULTS: Contextual factors affecting implementation included facility preparedness for change, leadership, staff knowledge and skills, and organisational policies. Mechanisms of change that facilitated implementation included staff as facilitators, identifying and triaging residents, strategizing knowledge exchange, and changing clinical approaches to care. Care home staff also identified planning and documentation, and shifts in communication. The outcomes reported by staff suggest reductions in hospitalisations and problematic symptoms for residents, improved staff skills and confidence in caring for residents in their last months, weeks and days of life. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of this paper is in offering care homes detailed insights into service contexts and mechanisms of change that will enable them to reap the benefits of Needs Rounds in their own services. The paper thus will support the implementation of an approach to care that has a robust evidence base, for a population under-served by specialist palliative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000080325. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4. BioMed Central 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8299598/ /pubmed/34294068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Koerner, Jane
Johnston, Nikki
Samara, Juliane
Liu, Wai-Man
Chapman, Michael
Forbat, Liz
Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title_full Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title_short Context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care Needs Rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
title_sort context and mechanisms that enable implementation of specialist palliative care needs rounds in care homes: results from a qualitative interview study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34294068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00812-4
work_keys_str_mv AT koernerjane contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT johnstonnikki contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT samarajuliane contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT liuwaiman contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT chapmanmichael contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT forbatliz contextandmechanismsthatenableimplementationofspecialistpalliativecareneedsroundsincarehomesresultsfromaqualitativeinterviewstudy