Cargando…

Simplified figure to present direct and indirect comparisons: Revisiting the graph 10 years later

A “simplified” figure was proposed in 2011 to summarize the results of controlled trials that evaluate different treatments aimed at the same disease condition. The original criteria for classifying individual binary comparisons included superiority, inferiority and no significance difference; hence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadda, Valeria, Bartoli, Laura, Ferracane, Elisa, Trippoli, Sabrina, Messori, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8299911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322372
http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.228
Descripción
Sumario:A “simplified” figure was proposed in 2011 to summarize the results of controlled trials that evaluate different treatments aimed at the same disease condition. The original criteria for classifying individual binary comparisons included superiority, inferiority and no significance difference; hence, they did not differentiate between no proof of difference vs proof of no difference. We updated the criteria employed in the original “simplified” figure in order to include this differentiation. A revised version of the simplified figure is proposed and described herein. An example of application is also presented. The example is focused on first-line treatments for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Three treatments (medical therapy, cryoballoon ablation, radiofrequency ablation) are compared with one another through direct and indirect comparisons.