Cargando…
Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113 |
_version_ | 1783726593915486208 |
---|---|
author | Lawag, Ivan Lozada Yoo, Okhee Lim, Lee Yong Hammer, Katherine Locher, Cornelia |
author_facet | Lawag, Ivan Lozada Yoo, Okhee Lim, Lee Yong Hammer, Katherine Locher, Cornelia |
author_sort | Lawag, Ivan Lozada |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) data. This hampers the comparative analysis of bee pollen from different floral sources and geographical locations. Based on the review, an in-depth investigation was carried out to identify the most efficient process to maximise the extraction of components for measurement of TPC, DPPH and FRAP antioxidant activity for two bee pollen samples from western Australia (Jarrah and Marri pollen). Optimisation by Design of Experiment with Multilevel Factorial Analysis (Categorical) modelling was performed. The independent variables included pollen pulverisation, the extraction solvent (70% aqueous ethanol, ethanol, methanol and water) and the extraction process (agitation, maceration, reflux and sonication). The data demonstrate that non-pulverised bee pollen extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol using the agitation extraction method constitute the optimal conditions to maximise the extraction of phenolics and antioxidant principles in these bee pollen samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8301099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83010992021-07-24 Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents Lawag, Ivan Lozada Yoo, Okhee Lim, Lee Yong Hammer, Katherine Locher, Cornelia Antioxidants (Basel) Article This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) data. This hampers the comparative analysis of bee pollen from different floral sources and geographical locations. Based on the review, an in-depth investigation was carried out to identify the most efficient process to maximise the extraction of components for measurement of TPC, DPPH and FRAP antioxidant activity for two bee pollen samples from western Australia (Jarrah and Marri pollen). Optimisation by Design of Experiment with Multilevel Factorial Analysis (Categorical) modelling was performed. The independent variables included pollen pulverisation, the extraction solvent (70% aqueous ethanol, ethanol, methanol and water) and the extraction process (agitation, maceration, reflux and sonication). The data demonstrate that non-pulverised bee pollen extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol using the agitation extraction method constitute the optimal conditions to maximise the extraction of phenolics and antioxidant principles in these bee pollen samples. MDPI 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8301099/ /pubmed/34356345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lawag, Ivan Lozada Yoo, Okhee Lim, Lee Yong Hammer, Katherine Locher, Cornelia Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title | Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title_full | Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title_fullStr | Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title_short | Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents |
title_sort | optimisation of bee pollen extraction to maximise extractable antioxidant constituents |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawagivanlozada optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents AT yoookhee optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents AT limleeyong optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents AT hammerkatherine optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents AT lochercornelia optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents |