Cargando…

Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents

This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lawag, Ivan Lozada, Yoo, Okhee, Lim, Lee Yong, Hammer, Katherine, Locher, Cornelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113
_version_ 1783726593915486208
author Lawag, Ivan Lozada
Yoo, Okhee
Lim, Lee Yong
Hammer, Katherine
Locher, Cornelia
author_facet Lawag, Ivan Lozada
Yoo, Okhee
Lim, Lee Yong
Hammer, Katherine
Locher, Cornelia
author_sort Lawag, Ivan Lozada
collection PubMed
description This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) data. This hampers the comparative analysis of bee pollen from different floral sources and geographical locations. Based on the review, an in-depth investigation was carried out to identify the most efficient process to maximise the extraction of components for measurement of TPC, DPPH and FRAP antioxidant activity for two bee pollen samples from western Australia (Jarrah and Marri pollen). Optimisation by Design of Experiment with Multilevel Factorial Analysis (Categorical) modelling was performed. The independent variables included pollen pulverisation, the extraction solvent (70% aqueous ethanol, ethanol, methanol and water) and the extraction process (agitation, maceration, reflux and sonication). The data demonstrate that non-pulverised bee pollen extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol using the agitation extraction method constitute the optimal conditions to maximise the extraction of phenolics and antioxidant principles in these bee pollen samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8301099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83010992021-07-24 Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents Lawag, Ivan Lozada Yoo, Okhee Lim, Lee Yong Hammer, Katherine Locher, Cornelia Antioxidants (Basel) Article This paper presents the findings of a comprehensive review on common bee pollen processing methods which can impact extraction efficiency and lead to differences in measured total phenolic content (TPC) and radical scavenging activity based on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) data. This hampers the comparative analysis of bee pollen from different floral sources and geographical locations. Based on the review, an in-depth investigation was carried out to identify the most efficient process to maximise the extraction of components for measurement of TPC, DPPH and FRAP antioxidant activity for two bee pollen samples from western Australia (Jarrah and Marri pollen). Optimisation by Design of Experiment with Multilevel Factorial Analysis (Categorical) modelling was performed. The independent variables included pollen pulverisation, the extraction solvent (70% aqueous ethanol, ethanol, methanol and water) and the extraction process (agitation, maceration, reflux and sonication). The data demonstrate that non-pulverised bee pollen extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol using the agitation extraction method constitute the optimal conditions to maximise the extraction of phenolics and antioxidant principles in these bee pollen samples. MDPI 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8301099/ /pubmed/34356345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lawag, Ivan Lozada
Yoo, Okhee
Lim, Lee Yong
Hammer, Katherine
Locher, Cornelia
Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title_full Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title_fullStr Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title_full_unstemmed Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title_short Optimisation of Bee Pollen Extraction to Maximise Extractable Antioxidant Constituents
title_sort optimisation of bee pollen extraction to maximise extractable antioxidant constituents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071113
work_keys_str_mv AT lawagivanlozada optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents
AT yoookhee optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents
AT limleeyong optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents
AT hammerkatherine optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents
AT lochercornelia optimisationofbeepollenextractiontomaximiseextractableantioxidantconstituents