Cargando…

Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds

Successful fracture healing is dependent on an optimal mechanical and biological environment at the fracture site. Disturbances in fracture healing (non-union) or even critical size bone defects, where void volume is larger than the self-healing capacity of bone tissue, are great challenges for orth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wähnert, Dirk, Greiner, Johannes, Brianza, Stefano, Kaltschmidt, Christian, Vordemvenne, Thomas, Kaltschmidt, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070746
_version_ 1783726650366623744
author Wähnert, Dirk
Greiner, Johannes
Brianza, Stefano
Kaltschmidt, Christian
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Kaltschmidt, Barbara
author_facet Wähnert, Dirk
Greiner, Johannes
Brianza, Stefano
Kaltschmidt, Christian
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Kaltschmidt, Barbara
author_sort Wähnert, Dirk
collection PubMed
description Successful fracture healing is dependent on an optimal mechanical and biological environment at the fracture site. Disturbances in fracture healing (non-union) or even critical size bone defects, where void volume is larger than the self-healing capacity of bone tissue, are great challenges for orthopedic surgeons. To address these challenges, new surgical implant concepts have been recently developed to optimize mechanical conditions. First, this review article discusses the mechanical environment on bone and fracture healing. In this context, a new implant concept, variable fixation technology, is introduced. This implant has the unique ability to change its mechanical properties from “rigid” to “dynamic” over the time of fracture healing. This leads to increased callus formation, a more homogeneous callus distribution and thus improved fracture healing. Second, recent advances in the nano- and micro-topography of bone scaffolds for guiding osteoinduction will be reviewed, particularly emphasizing the mimicry of natural bone. We summarize that an optimal scaffold should comprise micropores of 50–150 µm diameter allowing vascularization and migration of stem cells as well as nanotopographical osteoinductive cues, preferably pores of 30 nm diameter. Next to osteoinduction, such nano- and micro-topographical cues may also reduce inflammation and possess an antibacterial activity to further promote bone regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8301359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83013592021-07-24 Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds Wähnert, Dirk Greiner, Johannes Brianza, Stefano Kaltschmidt, Christian Vordemvenne, Thomas Kaltschmidt, Barbara Biomedicines Review Successful fracture healing is dependent on an optimal mechanical and biological environment at the fracture site. Disturbances in fracture healing (non-union) or even critical size bone defects, where void volume is larger than the self-healing capacity of bone tissue, are great challenges for orthopedic surgeons. To address these challenges, new surgical implant concepts have been recently developed to optimize mechanical conditions. First, this review article discusses the mechanical environment on bone and fracture healing. In this context, a new implant concept, variable fixation technology, is introduced. This implant has the unique ability to change its mechanical properties from “rigid” to “dynamic” over the time of fracture healing. This leads to increased callus formation, a more homogeneous callus distribution and thus improved fracture healing. Second, recent advances in the nano- and micro-topography of bone scaffolds for guiding osteoinduction will be reviewed, particularly emphasizing the mimicry of natural bone. We summarize that an optimal scaffold should comprise micropores of 50–150 µm diameter allowing vascularization and migration of stem cells as well as nanotopographical osteoinductive cues, preferably pores of 30 nm diameter. Next to osteoinduction, such nano- and micro-topographical cues may also reduce inflammation and possess an antibacterial activity to further promote bone regeneration. MDPI 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8301359/ /pubmed/34203437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070746 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wähnert, Dirk
Greiner, Johannes
Brianza, Stefano
Kaltschmidt, Christian
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Kaltschmidt, Barbara
Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title_full Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title_fullStr Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title_short Strategies to Improve Bone Healing: Innovative Surgical Implants Meet Nano-/Micro-Topography of Bone Scaffolds
title_sort strategies to improve bone healing: innovative surgical implants meet nano-/micro-topography of bone scaffolds
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070746
work_keys_str_mv AT wahnertdirk strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds
AT greinerjohannes strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds
AT brianzastefano strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds
AT kaltschmidtchristian strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds
AT vordemvennethomas strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds
AT kaltschmidtbarbara strategiestoimprovebonehealinginnovativesurgicalimplantsmeetnanomicrotopographyofbonescaffolds