Cargando…

Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers

Joint attention, or sharing attention with another individual about an object or event, is a critical behaviour that emerges in pre-linguistic infants and predicts later language abilities. Given its importance, it is perhaps surprising that there is no consensus on how to measure joint attention in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Kirsty E., Buryn-Weitzel, Joanna C., Lahiff, Nicole J., Wilke, Claudia, Slocombe, Katie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34297777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255241
_version_ 1783726717426204672
author Graham, Kirsty E.
Buryn-Weitzel, Joanna C.
Lahiff, Nicole J.
Wilke, Claudia
Slocombe, Katie E.
author_facet Graham, Kirsty E.
Buryn-Weitzel, Joanna C.
Lahiff, Nicole J.
Wilke, Claudia
Slocombe, Katie E.
author_sort Graham, Kirsty E.
collection PubMed
description Joint attention, or sharing attention with another individual about an object or event, is a critical behaviour that emerges in pre-linguistic infants and predicts later language abilities. Given its importance, it is perhaps surprising that there is no consensus on how to measure joint attention in prelinguistic infants. A rigorous definition proposed by Siposova & Carpenter (2019) requires the infant and partner to gaze alternate between an object and each other (coordination of attention) and exchange communicative signals (explicit acknowledgement of jointly sharing attention). However, Hobson and Hobson (2007) proposed that the quality of gaze between individuals is, in itself, a sufficient communicative signal that demonstrates sharing of attention. They proposed that observers can reliably distinguish “sharing”, “checking”, and “orienting” looks, but the empirical basis for this claim is limited as their study focussed on two raters examining looks from 11-year-old children. Here, we analysed categorisations made by 32 naïve raters of 60 infant looks to their mothers, to examine whether they could be reliably distinguished according to Hobson and Hobson’s definitions. Raters had overall low agreement and only in 3 out of 26 cases did a significant majority of the raters agree with the judgement of the mother who had received the look. For the looks that raters did agree on at above chance levels, look duration and the overall communication rate of the mother were identified as cues that raters may have relied upon. In our experiment, naïve third party observers could not reliably determine the type of look infants gave to their mothers, which indicates that subjective judgements of types of look should not be used to identify mutual awareness of sharing attention in infants. Instead, we advocate the use of objective behaviour measurement to infer that interactants know they are ‘jointly’ attending to an object or event, and believe this will be a crucial step in understanding the ontogenetic and evolutionary origins of joint attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8301644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83016442021-07-31 Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers Graham, Kirsty E. Buryn-Weitzel, Joanna C. Lahiff, Nicole J. Wilke, Claudia Slocombe, Katie E. PLoS One Research Article Joint attention, or sharing attention with another individual about an object or event, is a critical behaviour that emerges in pre-linguistic infants and predicts later language abilities. Given its importance, it is perhaps surprising that there is no consensus on how to measure joint attention in prelinguistic infants. A rigorous definition proposed by Siposova & Carpenter (2019) requires the infant and partner to gaze alternate between an object and each other (coordination of attention) and exchange communicative signals (explicit acknowledgement of jointly sharing attention). However, Hobson and Hobson (2007) proposed that the quality of gaze between individuals is, in itself, a sufficient communicative signal that demonstrates sharing of attention. They proposed that observers can reliably distinguish “sharing”, “checking”, and “orienting” looks, but the empirical basis for this claim is limited as their study focussed on two raters examining looks from 11-year-old children. Here, we analysed categorisations made by 32 naïve raters of 60 infant looks to their mothers, to examine whether they could be reliably distinguished according to Hobson and Hobson’s definitions. Raters had overall low agreement and only in 3 out of 26 cases did a significant majority of the raters agree with the judgement of the mother who had received the look. For the looks that raters did agree on at above chance levels, look duration and the overall communication rate of the mother were identified as cues that raters may have relied upon. In our experiment, naïve third party observers could not reliably determine the type of look infants gave to their mothers, which indicates that subjective judgements of types of look should not be used to identify mutual awareness of sharing attention in infants. Instead, we advocate the use of objective behaviour measurement to infer that interactants know they are ‘jointly’ attending to an object or event, and believe this will be a crucial step in understanding the ontogenetic and evolutionary origins of joint attention. Public Library of Science 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8301644/ /pubmed/34297777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255241 Text en © 2021 Graham et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Graham, Kirsty E.
Buryn-Weitzel, Joanna C.
Lahiff, Nicole J.
Wilke, Claudia
Slocombe, Katie E.
Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title_full Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title_fullStr Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title_full_unstemmed Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title_short Detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: Sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
title_sort detecting joint attention events in mother-infant dyads: sharing looks cannot be reliably identified by naïve third-party observers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34297777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255241
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamkirstye detectingjointattentioneventsinmotherinfantdyadssharinglookscannotbereliablyidentifiedbynaivethirdpartyobservers
AT burynweitzeljoannac detectingjointattentioneventsinmotherinfantdyadssharinglookscannotbereliablyidentifiedbynaivethirdpartyobservers
AT lahiffnicolej detectingjointattentioneventsinmotherinfantdyadssharinglookscannotbereliablyidentifiedbynaivethirdpartyobservers
AT wilkeclaudia detectingjointattentioneventsinmotherinfantdyadssharinglookscannotbereliablyidentifiedbynaivethirdpartyobservers
AT slocombekatiee detectingjointattentioneventsinmotherinfantdyadssharinglookscannotbereliablyidentifiedbynaivethirdpartyobservers