Cargando…

Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology

Nivolumab monotherapy is approved as adjuvant treatment for melanoma based on results from the pivotal CheckMate 238 trial. We present a model‐based, benefit–risk assessment of nivolumab in adjuvant melanoma supporting a posology change from a weight‐based to a less frequent, flat‐dosing regimen. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanghavi, Kinjal, Vuppala, Pradeep, Ivaturi, Vijay, Hamuro, Lora, Roy, Amit, Suryawanshi, Satyendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12642
_version_ 1783726849062338560
author Sanghavi, Kinjal
Vuppala, Pradeep
Ivaturi, Vijay
Hamuro, Lora
Roy, Amit
Suryawanshi, Satyendra
author_facet Sanghavi, Kinjal
Vuppala, Pradeep
Ivaturi, Vijay
Hamuro, Lora
Roy, Amit
Suryawanshi, Satyendra
author_sort Sanghavi, Kinjal
collection PubMed
description Nivolumab monotherapy is approved as adjuvant treatment for melanoma based on results from the pivotal CheckMate 238 trial. We present a model‐based, benefit–risk assessment of nivolumab in adjuvant melanoma supporting a posology change from a weight‐based to a less frequent, flat‐dosing regimen. The exposure–response (E–R) relationship for efficacy was evaluated using recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) end points from the CheckMate 238 trial. The E–R for safety was evaluated using data from 14 studies across a broad range of doses in several tumor types using grade 3+ adverse event (AE) and grade 2+ immune‐mediated AE (IMAE) end points. Nivolumab trough exposures were not significant predictors of RFS or DMFS. Covariates significantly associated with increased risk of disease recurrence or death were programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1; less than 5% cutoff), lower baseline lactate dehydrogenase, and higher age. Covariates associated with increased risk of distant metastasis or death were PD‐L1 (less than 5% cutoff) and higher age. Higher nivolumab maximum concentration after first dose (Cmax1) was significantly associated with grade 2+ IMAEs, but not grade 3+ AEs. The risk of grade 3+ AEs was significantly lower in adjuvant versus advanced melanoma. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status higher than zero was associated with higher incidences of grade 2+ IMAEs and grade 3+ AEs. Female patients had significantly higher incidences of grade 2+ IMAEs than male patients. Nivolumab monotherapy in adjuvant melanoma demonstrated a relatively flat E–R relationship over the range of exposures produced by 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and predicted a comparable benefit–risk profile to flat‐dosing regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8302247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83022472021-07-28 Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology Sanghavi, Kinjal Vuppala, Pradeep Ivaturi, Vijay Hamuro, Lora Roy, Amit Suryawanshi, Satyendra CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Nivolumab monotherapy is approved as adjuvant treatment for melanoma based on results from the pivotal CheckMate 238 trial. We present a model‐based, benefit–risk assessment of nivolumab in adjuvant melanoma supporting a posology change from a weight‐based to a less frequent, flat‐dosing regimen. The exposure–response (E–R) relationship for efficacy was evaluated using recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) end points from the CheckMate 238 trial. The E–R for safety was evaluated using data from 14 studies across a broad range of doses in several tumor types using grade 3+ adverse event (AE) and grade 2+ immune‐mediated AE (IMAE) end points. Nivolumab trough exposures were not significant predictors of RFS or DMFS. Covariates significantly associated with increased risk of disease recurrence or death were programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1; less than 5% cutoff), lower baseline lactate dehydrogenase, and higher age. Covariates associated with increased risk of distant metastasis or death were PD‐L1 (less than 5% cutoff) and higher age. Higher nivolumab maximum concentration after first dose (Cmax1) was significantly associated with grade 2+ IMAEs, but not grade 3+ AEs. The risk of grade 3+ AEs was significantly lower in adjuvant versus advanced melanoma. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status higher than zero was associated with higher incidences of grade 2+ IMAEs and grade 3+ AEs. Female patients had significantly higher incidences of grade 2+ IMAEs than male patients. Nivolumab monotherapy in adjuvant melanoma demonstrated a relatively flat E–R relationship over the range of exposures produced by 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and predicted a comparable benefit–risk profile to flat‐dosing regimens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-11 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8302247/ /pubmed/33955714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12642 Text en © 2021 Bristol Myers Squibb Co. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Sanghavi, Kinjal
Vuppala, Pradeep
Ivaturi, Vijay
Hamuro, Lora
Roy, Amit
Suryawanshi, Satyendra
Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title_full Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title_fullStr Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title_full_unstemmed Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title_short Nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
title_sort nivolumab exposure–response analysis for adjuvant treatment of melanoma supporting a change in posology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12642
work_keys_str_mv AT sanghavikinjal nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology
AT vuppalapradeep nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology
AT ivaturivijay nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology
AT hamurolora nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology
AT royamit nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology
AT suryawanshisatyendra nivolumabexposureresponseanalysisforadjuvanttreatmentofmelanomasupportingachangeinposology