Cargando…
An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study
OBJECTIVE: Beyond static assessment, functional techniques are increasingly applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Stress MRI techniques bring together MRI and mechanical loading to study knee joint and tissue functionality, yet prototypical axial compressive loading devices are bulky...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-020-00844-6 |
_version_ | 1783726903988846592 |
---|---|
author | Said, Oliver Schock, Justus Krämer, Nils Thüring, Johannes Hitpass, Lea Schad, Philipp Kuhl, Christiane Abrar, Daniel Truhn, Daniel Nebelung, Sven |
author_facet | Said, Oliver Schock, Justus Krämer, Nils Thüring, Johannes Hitpass, Lea Schad, Philipp Kuhl, Christiane Abrar, Daniel Truhn, Daniel Nebelung, Sven |
author_sort | Said, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Beyond static assessment, functional techniques are increasingly applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Stress MRI techniques bring together MRI and mechanical loading to study knee joint and tissue functionality, yet prototypical axial compressive loading devices are bulky and complex to operate. This study aimed to design and validate an MRI-compatible pressure-controlled varus–valgus loading device that applies loading along the joint line. METHODS: Following the device’s thorough validation, we demonstrated proof of concept by subjecting a structurally intact human cadaveric knee joint to serial imaging in unloaded and loaded configurations, i.e. to varus and valgus loading at 7.5 kPa (= 73.5 N), 15 kPa (= 147.1 N), and 22.5 kPa (= 220.6 N). Following clinical standard (PDw fs) and high-resolution 3D water-selective cartilage (WATSc) sequences, we performed manual segmentations and computations of morphometric cartilage measures. We used CT and radiography (to quantify joint space widths) and histology and biomechanics (to assess tissue quality) as references. RESULTS: We found (sub)regional decreases in cartilage volume, thickness, and mean joint space widths reflective of areal pressurization of the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments. DISCUSSION: Once substantiated by larger sample sizes, varus–valgus loading may provide a powerful alternative stress MRI technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10334-020-00844-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8302563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83025632021-07-27 An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study Said, Oliver Schock, Justus Krämer, Nils Thüring, Johannes Hitpass, Lea Schad, Philipp Kuhl, Christiane Abrar, Daniel Truhn, Daniel Nebelung, Sven MAGMA Research Article OBJECTIVE: Beyond static assessment, functional techniques are increasingly applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Stress MRI techniques bring together MRI and mechanical loading to study knee joint and tissue functionality, yet prototypical axial compressive loading devices are bulky and complex to operate. This study aimed to design and validate an MRI-compatible pressure-controlled varus–valgus loading device that applies loading along the joint line. METHODS: Following the device’s thorough validation, we demonstrated proof of concept by subjecting a structurally intact human cadaveric knee joint to serial imaging in unloaded and loaded configurations, i.e. to varus and valgus loading at 7.5 kPa (= 73.5 N), 15 kPa (= 147.1 N), and 22.5 kPa (= 220.6 N). Following clinical standard (PDw fs) and high-resolution 3D water-selective cartilage (WATSc) sequences, we performed manual segmentations and computations of morphometric cartilage measures. We used CT and radiography (to quantify joint space widths) and histology and biomechanics (to assess tissue quality) as references. RESULTS: We found (sub)regional decreases in cartilage volume, thickness, and mean joint space widths reflective of areal pressurization of the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments. DISCUSSION: Once substantiated by larger sample sizes, varus–valgus loading may provide a powerful alternative stress MRI technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10334-020-00844-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8302563/ /pubmed/32314105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-020-00844-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Said, Oliver Schock, Justus Krämer, Nils Thüring, Johannes Hitpass, Lea Schad, Philipp Kuhl, Christiane Abrar, Daniel Truhn, Daniel Nebelung, Sven An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title | An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title_full | An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title_fullStr | An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title_full_unstemmed | An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title_short | An MRI-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
title_sort | mri-compatible varus–valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-020-00844-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saidoliver anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT schockjustus anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT kramernils anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT thuringjohannes anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT hitpasslea anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT schadphilipp anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT kuhlchristiane anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT abrardaniel anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT truhndaniel anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT nebelungsven anmricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT saidoliver mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT schockjustus mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT kramernils mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT thuringjohannes mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT hitpasslea mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT schadphilipp mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT kuhlchristiane mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT abrardaniel mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT truhndaniel mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy AT nebelungsven mricompatiblevarusvalgusloadingdeviceforwholekneejointfunctionalityassessmentbasedoncompartmentalcompressionaproofofconceptstudy |