Cargando…

Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK

PURPOSE: Microbial keratitis (MK) is the most common non-surgical ophthalmic emergency admission in the UK. However, few prospective health-economic studies of MK have been performed, and no specific healthcare resources group (HRG) code exists. This study is designed to determine the feasibility of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moussa, George, Hodson, James, Gooch, Nick, Virdee, Jasvir, Penaloza, Cristina, Kigozi, Jesse, Rauz, Saaeha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33288899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01333-9
_version_ 1783726935467098112
author Moussa, George
Hodson, James
Gooch, Nick
Virdee, Jasvir
Penaloza, Cristina
Kigozi, Jesse
Rauz, Saaeha
author_facet Moussa, George
Hodson, James
Gooch, Nick
Virdee, Jasvir
Penaloza, Cristina
Kigozi, Jesse
Rauz, Saaeha
author_sort Moussa, George
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Microbial keratitis (MK) is the most common non-surgical ophthalmic emergency admission in the UK. However, few prospective health-economic studies of MK have been performed, and no specific healthcare resources group (HRG) code exists. This study is designed to determine the feasibility of a data collection tool derived from the microbiology ophthalmology group (MOG) clinical record form, to enable quantification of direct costs of inpatient care, as well as prospective capture of epidemiological data relating to outcomes of MK. METHODS: Clinical, demographic and economic data were collected retrospectively between January and December 2013 for 101 consecutive patients admitted with MK, using an adaption of the MOG toolset. The direct cost of admission (COA) was calculated using national reference costs and compared to actual income to generate profit/deficit profiles for individual patients. Indices of multiple deprivation were used to assess effect of deprivation on the COA. RESULTS: The total income generated through discharge coding was £252,116, compared to a COA of £357,075, yielding a deficit of £104,960 (median: £754 per patient). The cost deficit increased significantly with length of stay (LOS, p < 0.001), whilst patients with short LOS were income generators; cost neutrality occurred at 4.8 days. Greater socioeconomic deprivation was also associated with a significantly higher cost deficit. CONCLUSION: LOS is the key driver for COA of care for MK admissions. Protocols should encourage discharge of patients who are able to self-administer treatment after the sterilisation phase. The MOG-derived data collection toolset captures pertinent clinical data for quantification of COA. Further development into a multiuser and multisite platform is required for robust prospective testing, together with expansion to capture indirect costs of disease burden, including impact of treatment, visual morbidity and quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8302743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83027432021-08-12 Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK Moussa, George Hodson, James Gooch, Nick Virdee, Jasvir Penaloza, Cristina Kigozi, Jesse Rauz, Saaeha Eye (Lond) Article PURPOSE: Microbial keratitis (MK) is the most common non-surgical ophthalmic emergency admission in the UK. However, few prospective health-economic studies of MK have been performed, and no specific healthcare resources group (HRG) code exists. This study is designed to determine the feasibility of a data collection tool derived from the microbiology ophthalmology group (MOG) clinical record form, to enable quantification of direct costs of inpatient care, as well as prospective capture of epidemiological data relating to outcomes of MK. METHODS: Clinical, demographic and economic data were collected retrospectively between January and December 2013 for 101 consecutive patients admitted with MK, using an adaption of the MOG toolset. The direct cost of admission (COA) was calculated using national reference costs and compared to actual income to generate profit/deficit profiles for individual patients. Indices of multiple deprivation were used to assess effect of deprivation on the COA. RESULTS: The total income generated through discharge coding was £252,116, compared to a COA of £357,075, yielding a deficit of £104,960 (median: £754 per patient). The cost deficit increased significantly with length of stay (LOS, p < 0.001), whilst patients with short LOS were income generators; cost neutrality occurred at 4.8 days. Greater socioeconomic deprivation was also associated with a significantly higher cost deficit. CONCLUSION: LOS is the key driver for COA of care for MK admissions. Protocols should encourage discharge of patients who are able to self-administer treatment after the sterilisation phase. The MOG-derived data collection toolset captures pertinent clinical data for quantification of COA. Further development into a multiuser and multisite platform is required for robust prospective testing, together with expansion to capture indirect costs of disease burden, including impact of treatment, visual morbidity and quality of life. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-07 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8302743/ /pubmed/33288899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01333-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Moussa, George
Hodson, James
Gooch, Nick
Virdee, Jasvir
Penaloza, Cristina
Kigozi, Jesse
Rauz, Saaeha
Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title_full Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title_fullStr Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title_short Calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the UK
title_sort calculating the economic burden of presumed microbial keratitis admissions at a tertiary referral centre in the uk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33288899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01333-9
work_keys_str_mv AT moussageorge calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT hodsonjames calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT goochnick calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT virdeejasvir calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT penalozacristina calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT kigozijesse calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk
AT rauzsaaeha calculatingtheeconomicburdenofpresumedmicrobialkeratitisadmissionsatatertiaryreferralcentreintheuk