Cargando…

Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score

PURPOSE: To evaluate potential associations between 4 nephrometric scoring systems, namely the PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification), RENAL (radius endophytic/exophytic nearness anterior posterior location), ABC (arterial-based complexity), and MAP (Mayo adhe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sempels, Maxime, Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali, Meunier, Paul, Waltregny, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322455
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S293864
_version_ 1783726949622874112
author Sempels, Maxime
Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali
Meunier, Paul
Waltregny, David
author_facet Sempels, Maxime
Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali
Meunier, Paul
Waltregny, David
author_sort Sempels, Maxime
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate potential associations between 4 nephrometric scoring systems, namely the PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification), RENAL (radius endophytic/exophytic nearness anterior posterior location), ABC (arterial-based complexity), and MAP (Mayo adhesive probability) scores and their individual components, with surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing a partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive, monocentric cohort of partial nephrectomy patients was retrospectively analyzed. PADUA, RENAL, ABC and MAP nephrometry scores were determined from preoperative axial images. Unadjusted and adjusted associations between overall scores, individual components, surgical approach, complications and oncological outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 189 partial nephrectomies were performed in 181 patients, via an open or a laparoscopic approach. Among scoring systems, only the MAP classification, which assesses adherent perinephric fat, was associated with severe surgical complications as well as with operative time (p<0.05). Among all components of the PADUA and RENAL scores, only proximity of the tumor to the collecting system was associated with overall surgical complication rates, while the diameter of the tumor influenced the operative time (p<0.05). The ABC score was not relevant. Male gender, antiplatelet therapy, and a laparoscopic approach were associated with higher overall surgical complication rates (p<0.05). The number of oncologic recurrences during follow-up was too low to run statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: Nephrometry scores could be simplified to predict surgical complications after partial nephrectomy. In this framework, adherent perinephric fat seemed to be strongly associated with an increased risk of surgical complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8302811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83028112021-07-27 Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Sempels, Maxime Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Meunier, Paul Waltregny, David Res Rep Urol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate potential associations between 4 nephrometric scoring systems, namely the PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification), RENAL (radius endophytic/exophytic nearness anterior posterior location), ABC (arterial-based complexity), and MAP (Mayo adhesive probability) scores and their individual components, with surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing a partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive, monocentric cohort of partial nephrectomy patients was retrospectively analyzed. PADUA, RENAL, ABC and MAP nephrometry scores were determined from preoperative axial images. Unadjusted and adjusted associations between overall scores, individual components, surgical approach, complications and oncological outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 189 partial nephrectomies were performed in 181 patients, via an open or a laparoscopic approach. Among scoring systems, only the MAP classification, which assesses adherent perinephric fat, was associated with severe surgical complications as well as with operative time (p<0.05). Among all components of the PADUA and RENAL scores, only proximity of the tumor to the collecting system was associated with overall surgical complication rates, while the diameter of the tumor influenced the operative time (p<0.05). The ABC score was not relevant. Male gender, antiplatelet therapy, and a laparoscopic approach were associated with higher overall surgical complication rates (p<0.05). The number of oncologic recurrences during follow-up was too low to run statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: Nephrometry scores could be simplified to predict surgical complications after partial nephrectomy. In this framework, adherent perinephric fat seemed to be strongly associated with an increased risk of surgical complications. Dove 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8302811/ /pubmed/34322455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S293864 Text en © 2021 Sempels et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sempels, Maxime
Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali
Meunier, Paul
Waltregny, David
Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title_full Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title_fullStr Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title_full_unstemmed Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title_short Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score
title_sort open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison and validation of preoperative scoring systems, including padua, renal, abc nephrometric scores and perinephric fat evaluation with mayo adhesive probability score
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322455
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S293864
work_keys_str_mv AT sempelsmaxime openandlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomycomparisonandvalidationofpreoperativescoringsystemsincludingpaduarenalabcnephrometricscoresandperinephricfatevaluationwithmayoadhesiveprobabilityscore
AT benchehidamohamedali openandlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomycomparisonandvalidationofpreoperativescoringsystemsincludingpaduarenalabcnephrometricscoresandperinephricfatevaluationwithmayoadhesiveprobabilityscore
AT meunierpaul openandlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomycomparisonandvalidationofpreoperativescoringsystemsincludingpaduarenalabcnephrometricscoresandperinephricfatevaluationwithmayoadhesiveprobabilityscore
AT waltregnydavid openandlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomycomparisonandvalidationofpreoperativescoringsystemsincludingpaduarenalabcnephrometricscoresandperinephricfatevaluationwithmayoadhesiveprobabilityscore