Cargando…
Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-ye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326971 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31 |
_version_ | 1783726970750631936 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Kamal Dani, Sameer Desai, Devang Kumar, Prathap Bhalani, Nirav Vasavada, Apurva Trivedi, Rutvik |
author_facet | Sharma, Kamal Dani, Sameer Desai, Devang Kumar, Prathap Bhalani, Nirav Vasavada, Apurva Trivedi, Rutvik |
author_sort | Sharma, Kamal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-year outcomes with the primary endpoint defined as 3P-MACE of CV death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) apart from Stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Of 2500 patients of PCI with 3286 Abluminus-DES+, 1641 (65.64%) were non-diabetics while859 (34.36%) were diabetics. The 3-P MACE for the cohort at 1 & 2 years were 2.9%, and 3.16%; TLR/TVR - 1.4% at both the intervals for 2493 patients at 2 yrs. follow-up. TV-MI & ST were 0.36% and0.56% at 1st and 2nd year respectively. The 3P-MACE was lower in non-diabetics at 1 & 2 years (2.3%vs 4.2%; 2.4% vs 4.7% respectively). For components of MACE, CV mortality (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr ; 1.0vs 2.1% at 2 years) was significant (P < 0.05) while TLR (1.1 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1.1 vs 2.1% at 2 yrs.) and TV-MI (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1 vs 2.1% at 2 years) were similar for diabetics and non-diabetics so was ST (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Abluminus-DES+ showed excellent 2-year safety and efficacy with low 3-P MACE which was higher in diabetics driven by higher CV death but similar TLR, TV-MI and ST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8302901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83029012021-07-28 Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY Sharma, Kamal Dani, Sameer Desai, Devang Kumar, Prathap Bhalani, Nirav Vasavada, Apurva Trivedi, Rutvik J Cardiovasc Thorac Res Original Article Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-year outcomes with the primary endpoint defined as 3P-MACE of CV death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) apart from Stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Of 2500 patients of PCI with 3286 Abluminus-DES+, 1641 (65.64%) were non-diabetics while859 (34.36%) were diabetics. The 3-P MACE for the cohort at 1 & 2 years were 2.9%, and 3.16%; TLR/TVR - 1.4% at both the intervals for 2493 patients at 2 yrs. follow-up. TV-MI & ST were 0.36% and0.56% at 1st and 2nd year respectively. The 3P-MACE was lower in non-diabetics at 1 & 2 years (2.3%vs 4.2%; 2.4% vs 4.7% respectively). For components of MACE, CV mortality (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr ; 1.0vs 2.1% at 2 years) was significant (P < 0.05) while TLR (1.1 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1.1 vs 2.1% at 2 yrs.) and TV-MI (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1 vs 2.1% at 2 years) were similar for diabetics and non-diabetics so was ST (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Abluminus-DES+ showed excellent 2-year safety and efficacy with low 3-P MACE which was higher in diabetics driven by higher CV death but similar TLR, TV-MI and ST. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8302901/ /pubmed/34326971 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Kamal Dani, Sameer Desai, Devang Kumar, Prathap Bhalani, Nirav Vasavada, Apurva Trivedi, Rutvik Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title | Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title_full | Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title_fullStr | Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title_short | Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY |
title_sort | two-year safety and efficacy of indigenous abluminus sirolimus eluting stent. does it differ amongst diabetics? – data from en-able- registry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326971 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmakamal twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT danisameer twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT desaidevang twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT kumarprathap twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT bhalaninirav twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT vasavadaapurva twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry AT trivedirutvik twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry |