Cargando…

Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY

Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Kamal, Dani, Sameer, Desai, Devang, Kumar, Prathap, Bhalani, Nirav, Vasavada, Apurva, Trivedi, Rutvik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326971
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31
_version_ 1783726970750631936
author Sharma, Kamal
Dani, Sameer
Desai, Devang
Kumar, Prathap
Bhalani, Nirav
Vasavada, Apurva
Trivedi, Rutvik
author_facet Sharma, Kamal
Dani, Sameer
Desai, Devang
Kumar, Prathap
Bhalani, Nirav
Vasavada, Apurva
Trivedi, Rutvik
author_sort Sharma, Kamal
collection PubMed
description Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-year outcomes with the primary endpoint defined as 3P-MACE of CV death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) apart from Stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Of 2500 patients of PCI with 3286 Abluminus-DES+, 1641 (65.64%) were non-diabetics while859 (34.36%) were diabetics. The 3-P MACE for the cohort at 1 & 2 years were 2.9%, and 3.16%; TLR/TVR - 1.4% at both the intervals for 2493 patients at 2 yrs. follow-up. TV-MI & ST were 0.36% and0.56% at 1st and 2nd year respectively. The 3P-MACE was lower in non-diabetics at 1 & 2 years (2.3%vs 4.2%; 2.4% vs 4.7% respectively). For components of MACE, CV mortality (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr ; 1.0vs 2.1% at 2 years) was significant (P < 0.05) while TLR (1.1 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1.1 vs 2.1% at 2 yrs.) and TV-MI (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1 vs 2.1% at 2 years) were similar for diabetics and non-diabetics so was ST (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Abluminus-DES+ showed excellent 2-year safety and efficacy with low 3-P MACE which was higher in diabetics driven by higher CV death but similar TLR, TV-MI and ST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8302901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83029012021-07-28 Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY Sharma, Kamal Dani, Sameer Desai, Devang Kumar, Prathap Bhalani, Nirav Vasavada, Apurva Trivedi, Rutvik J Cardiovasc Thorac Res Original Article Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy/safety profile of the Abluminus DES+ over 2-years follow-up in the "real-world" scenario in diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. Methods: In prospective, all-comers, open-label registry conducted at 31 sites, patients were analyzed for 1 & 2-year outcomes with the primary endpoint defined as 3P-MACE of CV death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) apart from Stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Of 2500 patients of PCI with 3286 Abluminus-DES+, 1641 (65.64%) were non-diabetics while859 (34.36%) were diabetics. The 3-P MACE for the cohort at 1 & 2 years were 2.9%, and 3.16%; TLR/TVR - 1.4% at both the intervals for 2493 patients at 2 yrs. follow-up. TV-MI & ST were 0.36% and0.56% at 1st and 2nd year respectively. The 3P-MACE was lower in non-diabetics at 1 & 2 years (2.3%vs 4.2%; 2.4% vs 4.7% respectively). For components of MACE, CV mortality (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr ; 1.0vs 2.1% at 2 years) was significant (P < 0.05) while TLR (1.1 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1.1 vs 2.1% at 2 yrs.) and TV-MI (0.9 vs 1.9% at 1 yr. & 1 vs 2.1% at 2 years) were similar for diabetics and non-diabetics so was ST (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Abluminus-DES+ showed excellent 2-year safety and efficacy with low 3-P MACE which was higher in diabetics driven by higher CV death but similar TLR, TV-MI and ST. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8302901/ /pubmed/34326971 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Kamal
Dani, Sameer
Desai, Devang
Kumar, Prathap
Bhalani, Nirav
Vasavada, Apurva
Trivedi, Rutvik
Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title_full Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title_fullStr Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title_full_unstemmed Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title_short Two-year safety and efficacy of Indigenous Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent. Does it differ amongst diabetics? – Data from en-ABLe- REGISTRY
title_sort two-year safety and efficacy of indigenous abluminus sirolimus eluting stent. does it differ amongst diabetics? – data from en-able- registry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8302901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326971
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2021.31
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmakamal twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT danisameer twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT desaidevang twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT kumarprathap twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT bhalaninirav twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT vasavadaapurva twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry
AT trivedirutvik twoyearsafetyandefficacyofindigenousabluminussirolimuselutingstentdoesitdifferamongstdiabeticsdatafromenableregistry