Cargando…

Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?

Pretreatment and codigestion are proven to be effective strategies for the enhancement of the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic residues. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of pretreatment and codigestion on methane production and the hydrolysis rate in the anaerobic digestion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumlu, Lütfiye, Ciggin, Asli Seyhan, Ručman, Stefan, Perendeci, N. Altınay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144175
_version_ 1783727106138570752
author Dumlu, Lütfiye
Ciggin, Asli Seyhan
Ručman, Stefan
Perendeci, N. Altınay
author_facet Dumlu, Lütfiye
Ciggin, Asli Seyhan
Ručman, Stefan
Perendeci, N. Altınay
author_sort Dumlu, Lütfiye
collection PubMed
description Pretreatment and codigestion are proven to be effective strategies for the enhancement of the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic residues. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of pretreatment and codigestion on methane production and the hydrolysis rate in the anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes (AWs). Thermal and different thermochemical pretreatments were applied on AWs. Sewage sludge (SS) was selected as a cosubstrate. Biochemical methane potential tests were performed by mixing SS with raw and pretreated AWs at different mixing ratios. Hydrolysis rates were estimated by the best fit obtained with the first-order kinetic model. As a result of the experimental and kinetic studies, the best strategy was determined to be thermochemical pretreatment with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). This strategy resulted in a maximum enhancement in the anaerobic digestion of AWs, a 56% increase in methane production, an 81.90% increase in the hydrolysis rate and a 79.63% decrease in the technical digestion time compared to raw AWs. On the other hand, anaerobic codigestion (AcoD) with SS was determined to be ineffective when it came to the enhancement of methane production and the hydrolysis rate. The most suitable mixing ratio was determined to be 80:20 (Aws/SS) for the AcoD of the studied AWs with SS in order to obtain the highest possible methane production without any antagonistic effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8303515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83035152021-07-25 Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste? Dumlu, Lütfiye Ciggin, Asli Seyhan Ručman, Stefan Perendeci, N. Altınay Molecules Article Pretreatment and codigestion are proven to be effective strategies for the enhancement of the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic residues. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of pretreatment and codigestion on methane production and the hydrolysis rate in the anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes (AWs). Thermal and different thermochemical pretreatments were applied on AWs. Sewage sludge (SS) was selected as a cosubstrate. Biochemical methane potential tests were performed by mixing SS with raw and pretreated AWs at different mixing ratios. Hydrolysis rates were estimated by the best fit obtained with the first-order kinetic model. As a result of the experimental and kinetic studies, the best strategy was determined to be thermochemical pretreatment with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). This strategy resulted in a maximum enhancement in the anaerobic digestion of AWs, a 56% increase in methane production, an 81.90% increase in the hydrolysis rate and a 79.63% decrease in the technical digestion time compared to raw AWs. On the other hand, anaerobic codigestion (AcoD) with SS was determined to be ineffective when it came to the enhancement of methane production and the hydrolysis rate. The most suitable mixing ratio was determined to be 80:20 (Aws/SS) for the AcoD of the studied AWs with SS in order to obtain the highest possible methane production without any antagonistic effect. MDPI 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8303515/ /pubmed/34299449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144175 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dumlu, Lütfiye
Ciggin, Asli Seyhan
Ručman, Stefan
Perendeci, N. Altınay
Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title_full Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title_fullStr Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title_short Pretreatment, Anaerobic Codigestion, or Both? Which Is More Suitable for the Enhancement of Methane Production from Agricultural Waste?
title_sort pretreatment, anaerobic codigestion, or both? which is more suitable for the enhancement of methane production from agricultural waste?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144175
work_keys_str_mv AT dumlulutfiye pretreatmentanaerobiccodigestionorbothwhichismoresuitablefortheenhancementofmethaneproductionfromagriculturalwaste
AT cigginasliseyhan pretreatmentanaerobiccodigestionorbothwhichismoresuitablefortheenhancementofmethaneproductionfromagriculturalwaste
AT rucmanstefan pretreatmentanaerobiccodigestionorbothwhichismoresuitablefortheenhancementofmethaneproductionfromagriculturalwaste
AT perendecinaltınay pretreatmentanaerobiccodigestionorbothwhichismoresuitablefortheenhancementofmethaneproductionfromagriculturalwaste