Cargando…

Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study

Absorbable porcine collagen membrane with a bovine bone graft can be considered for regenerative treatment in periodontal class II furcation defects. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment with bovine bone xenograft and a porcine collagen membrane in molars...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorj, Odontuya, Lee, Wei-Fang, Salamanca, Eisner, Pan, Yu-Hwa, Wu, Yi-Fan, Hsu, Yung-Szu, Lin, Jerry C. Y., Lin, Yu-De, Choy, Cheuk-Sing, Chang, Wei-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147447
_version_ 1783727213027262464
author Dorj, Odontuya
Lee, Wei-Fang
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C. Y.
Lin, Yu-De
Choy, Cheuk-Sing
Chang, Wei-Jen
author_facet Dorj, Odontuya
Lee, Wei-Fang
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C. Y.
Lin, Yu-De
Choy, Cheuk-Sing
Chang, Wei-Jen
author_sort Dorj, Odontuya
collection PubMed
description Absorbable porcine collagen membrane with a bovine bone graft can be considered for regenerative treatment in periodontal class II furcation defects. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment with bovine bone xenograft and a porcine collagen membrane in molars with class II furcations. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bone level (BL) were recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Thirty class II furcation defects from the lower and upper molars were assessed. Significant improvements in PD and CAL were observed from baseline to 9 months in all groups (p < 0.01). BL improved in all groups except group A in the upper molars in radiographic assessment (p < 0.05). The lower and upper molars showed PD reduction of 50.5% ± 7.44% and 46.2% ± 11.2%, respectively, at 9 months (p = 0.044). In furcations of 1–3 mm, the lower and upper molars showed PD reductions of 51.2% ± 4.49% and 36.5% ± 16.14%, respectively (p = 0.035). The lower and upper molars showed a CAL gain of 51.1% ± 4.64% and 33.6% ± 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.037). Thus, GTR with bovine bone graft and porcine collagen membrane yielded good results in class II furcations, with better results in the lower than in the upper molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8303943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83039432021-07-25 Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study Dorj, Odontuya Lee, Wei-Fang Salamanca, Eisner Pan, Yu-Hwa Wu, Yi-Fan Hsu, Yung-Szu Lin, Jerry C. Y. Lin, Yu-De Choy, Cheuk-Sing Chang, Wei-Jen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Absorbable porcine collagen membrane with a bovine bone graft can be considered for regenerative treatment in periodontal class II furcation defects. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment with bovine bone xenograft and a porcine collagen membrane in molars with class II furcations. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bone level (BL) were recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Thirty class II furcation defects from the lower and upper molars were assessed. Significant improvements in PD and CAL were observed from baseline to 9 months in all groups (p < 0.01). BL improved in all groups except group A in the upper molars in radiographic assessment (p < 0.05). The lower and upper molars showed PD reduction of 50.5% ± 7.44% and 46.2% ± 11.2%, respectively, at 9 months (p = 0.044). In furcations of 1–3 mm, the lower and upper molars showed PD reductions of 51.2% ± 4.49% and 36.5% ± 16.14%, respectively (p = 0.035). The lower and upper molars showed a CAL gain of 51.1% ± 4.64% and 33.6% ± 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.037). Thus, GTR with bovine bone graft and porcine collagen membrane yielded good results in class II furcations, with better results in the lower than in the upper molars. MDPI 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8303943/ /pubmed/34299898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147447 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dorj, Odontuya
Lee, Wei-Fang
Salamanca, Eisner
Pan, Yu-Hwa
Wu, Yi-Fan
Hsu, Yung-Szu
Lin, Jerry C. Y.
Lin, Yu-De
Choy, Cheuk-Sing
Chang, Wei-Jen
Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_full Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_short Guided Tissue Regeneration Treatment Yields Better Results in Class II Furcations in the Mandible Than in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_sort guided tissue regeneration treatment yields better results in class ii furcations in the mandible than in the maxilla: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34299898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147447
work_keys_str_mv AT dorjodontuya guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT leeweifang guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT salamancaeisner guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT panyuhwa guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT wuyifan guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT hsuyungszu guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT linjerrycy guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT linyude guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT choycheuksing guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT changweijen guidedtissueregenerationtreatmentyieldsbetterresultsinclassiifurcationsinthemandiblethaninthemaxillaaretrospectivestudy