Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study

Urine bags are commonly used to collect urine samples from neonates. However, the sample can be contaminated by stool, or detachment of the bag due to body movement can lead to failure of the collection. A qualitative urine collection kit containing ten filter papers of 3.2 mm diameter was developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagano, Nobuhiko, Imaizumi, Takayuki, Akimoto, Takuya, Hijikata, Midori, Aoki, Ryoji, Seimiya, Ayako, Okahashi, Aya, Kawakami, Kaori, Komatsu, Atsushi, Kawana, Kei, Morioka, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8070561
_version_ 1783727245057064960
author Nagano, Nobuhiko
Imaizumi, Takayuki
Akimoto, Takuya
Hijikata, Midori
Aoki, Ryoji
Seimiya, Ayako
Okahashi, Aya
Kawakami, Kaori
Komatsu, Atsushi
Kawana, Kei
Morioka, Ichiro
author_facet Nagano, Nobuhiko
Imaizumi, Takayuki
Akimoto, Takuya
Hijikata, Midori
Aoki, Ryoji
Seimiya, Ayako
Okahashi, Aya
Kawakami, Kaori
Komatsu, Atsushi
Kawana, Kei
Morioka, Ichiro
author_sort Nagano, Nobuhiko
collection PubMed
description Urine bags are commonly used to collect urine samples from neonates. However, the sample can be contaminated by stool, or detachment of the bag due to body movement can lead to failure of the collection. A qualitative urine collection kit containing ten filter papers of 3.2 mm diameter was developed and clinically verified among 138 neonates. During a single diaper change (approximately 3 h), the rate of urine collection was calculated. Urine collection was considered to be successful if any filter paper in the urine collection sheet turned from blue to white. Of the 127 neonates who passed urine, 122 had a change in the filter paper. The urine collection rate was 96%, with changes in all 10 filter papers observed in 98 neonates (80%). Urine collection rate was not influenced by sex (p = 1.00), age at collection (p = 0.72), preterm birth (p = 1.00), low birth weight (p = 0.92), or fecal contamination (p = 1.00). The incidence of dermatitis was not higher than in the group in which urine bags were used (urine collection kit: 2/68 [3%]; urine bag: 5/68 [7%]; p = 0.44). Novel urine collection kits using filter paper can collect samples from neonates safely and with a high probability of success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8304071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83040712021-07-25 Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study Nagano, Nobuhiko Imaizumi, Takayuki Akimoto, Takuya Hijikata, Midori Aoki, Ryoji Seimiya, Ayako Okahashi, Aya Kawakami, Kaori Komatsu, Atsushi Kawana, Kei Morioka, Ichiro Children (Basel) Communication Urine bags are commonly used to collect urine samples from neonates. However, the sample can be contaminated by stool, or detachment of the bag due to body movement can lead to failure of the collection. A qualitative urine collection kit containing ten filter papers of 3.2 mm diameter was developed and clinically verified among 138 neonates. During a single diaper change (approximately 3 h), the rate of urine collection was calculated. Urine collection was considered to be successful if any filter paper in the urine collection sheet turned from blue to white. Of the 127 neonates who passed urine, 122 had a change in the filter paper. The urine collection rate was 96%, with changes in all 10 filter papers observed in 98 neonates (80%). Urine collection rate was not influenced by sex (p = 1.00), age at collection (p = 0.72), preterm birth (p = 1.00), low birth weight (p = 0.92), or fecal contamination (p = 1.00). The incidence of dermatitis was not higher than in the group in which urine bags were used (urine collection kit: 2/68 [3%]; urine bag: 5/68 [7%]; p = 0.44). Novel urine collection kits using filter paper can collect samples from neonates safely and with a high probability of success. MDPI 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8304071/ /pubmed/34209909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8070561 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Nagano, Nobuhiko
Imaizumi, Takayuki
Akimoto, Takuya
Hijikata, Midori
Aoki, Ryoji
Seimiya, Ayako
Okahashi, Aya
Kawakami, Kaori
Komatsu, Atsushi
Kawana, Kei
Morioka, Ichiro
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title_full Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title_short Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Urine Collection Kit Using Filter Paper in Neonates: An Observational Study
title_sort clinical evaluation of a novel urine collection kit using filter paper in neonates: an observational study
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34209909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8070561
work_keys_str_mv AT naganonobuhiko clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT imaizumitakayuki clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT akimototakuya clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT hijikatamidori clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT aokiryoji clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT seimiyaayako clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT okahashiaya clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT kawakamikaori clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT komatsuatsushi clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT kawanakei clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy
AT moriokaichiro clinicalevaluationofanovelurinecollectionkitusingfilterpaperinneonatesanobservationalstudy