Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth

Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peric, Tamara, Markovic, Evgenija, Markovic, Dejan, Petrovic, Bojan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915
_version_ 1783727278236106752
author Peric, Tamara
Markovic, Evgenija
Markovic, Dejan
Petrovic, Bojan
author_facet Peric, Tamara
Markovic, Evgenija
Markovic, Dejan
Petrovic, Bojan
author_sort Peric, Tamara
collection PubMed
description Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of in vitro studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8304208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83042082021-07-25 Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth Peric, Tamara Markovic, Evgenija Markovic, Dejan Petrovic, Bojan Materials (Basel) Review Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of in vitro studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8304208/ /pubmed/34300834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Peric, Tamara
Markovic, Evgenija
Markovic, Dejan
Petrovic, Bojan
Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title_full Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title_short Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
title_sort meta-analysis of in-vitro bonding of glass-ionomer restorative materials to primary teeth
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915
work_keys_str_mv AT perictamara metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth
AT markovicevgenija metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth
AT markovicdejan metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth
AT petrovicbojan metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth