Cargando…
Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth
Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915 |
_version_ | 1783727278236106752 |
---|---|
author | Peric, Tamara Markovic, Evgenija Markovic, Dejan Petrovic, Bojan |
author_facet | Peric, Tamara Markovic, Evgenija Markovic, Dejan Petrovic, Bojan |
author_sort | Peric, Tamara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of in vitro studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8304208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83042082021-07-25 Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth Peric, Tamara Markovic, Evgenija Markovic, Dejan Petrovic, Bojan Materials (Basel) Review Restoration of primary teeth is among the main clinical applications of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). The aim of the study was to review and summarize existing evidence of in vitro bond strength of glass-ionomer (GI) restoratives to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published until April 2021. The search strategy was: (“glass”) and (“ionomer”) and (“primary” or “deciduous”) and (“bond” or “tensile” or “shear”). Two researchers independently retrieved articles that reported on the bond strength of GIC to primary dentin and/or enamel. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the bond strength values of conventional (C) GIC and resin-modified (RM) GIC to different substrates. From 831 potentially eligible articles, 30 were selected for the full-text examination, and 7 were included in the analysis. Studies were rated at high (3), medium (3), and low (1) risk of bias. RM-GIC showed higher bond strength to primary enamel and dentin compared to the C-GIC. Meta-analysis of in vitro studies, evaluating bonding properties of GI restoratives to primary teeth, suggests the superior performance of RM-GIC. However, there is a lack of studies that examine the properties of novel GI formulations. MDPI 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8304208/ /pubmed/34300834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Peric, Tamara Markovic, Evgenija Markovic, Dejan Petrovic, Bojan Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_full | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_short | Meta-Analysis of In-Vitro Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials to Primary Teeth |
title_sort | meta-analysis of in-vitro bonding of glass-ionomer restorative materials to primary teeth |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14143915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perictamara metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT markovicevgenija metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT markovicdejan metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth AT petrovicbojan metaanalysisofinvitrobondingofglassionomerrestorativematerialstoprimaryteeth |