Cargando…

Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms

This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jae-Ik, Kim, Dong-Hyun, Yoo, Hyun-Jin, Choi, Han-Gyeol, Lee, Yong-Seuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225
_version_ 1783727461509365760
author Lee, Jae-Ik
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Yoo, Hyun-Jin
Choi, Han-Gyeol
Lee, Yong-Seuk
author_facet Lee, Jae-Ik
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Yoo, Hyun-Jin
Choi, Han-Gyeol
Lee, Yong-Seuk
author_sort Lee, Jae-Ik
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the affecting factors for the surgery were evaluated using statistical analysis. Second, AI technology was introduced using X-ray and MRI. Finally, the accuracy and prediction performance were compared between ML&DL and logistic regression methods. Affecting factors of the logistic regression method corresponded well with the feature importance of the six top-ranked factors in the ML&DL method. There was no significant difference when comparing the accuracy, F1-score, and error rate between ML&DL and logistic regression methods (accuracy = 0.89 and 0.91, F1 score = 0.89 and 0.90, error rate = 0.11 and 0.09; p = 0.114, 0.422, and 0.119, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) values showed excellent test quality for both ML&DL and logistic regression methods (AUC = 0.97 and 0.94, respectively) in the evaluation of prediction performance (p = 0.289). The affecting factors of the logistic regression method and the influence of the ML&DL method were not significantly different. The accuracy and performance of the ML&DL method in predicting the fate of MMPRT were comparable to those of the logistic regression method. Therefore, this ML&DL algorithm could potentially predict the outcome of the MMRPT in various fields and situations. Furthermore, our method could be efficiently implemented in current clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8304966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83049662021-07-25 Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms Lee, Jae-Ik Kim, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Jin Choi, Han-Gyeol Lee, Yong-Seuk Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the affecting factors for the surgery were evaluated using statistical analysis. Second, AI technology was introduced using X-ray and MRI. Finally, the accuracy and prediction performance were compared between ML&DL and logistic regression methods. Affecting factors of the logistic regression method corresponded well with the feature importance of the six top-ranked factors in the ML&DL method. There was no significant difference when comparing the accuracy, F1-score, and error rate between ML&DL and logistic regression methods (accuracy = 0.89 and 0.91, F1 score = 0.89 and 0.90, error rate = 0.11 and 0.09; p = 0.114, 0.422, and 0.119, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) values showed excellent test quality for both ML&DL and logistic regression methods (AUC = 0.97 and 0.94, respectively) in the evaluation of prediction performance (p = 0.289). The affecting factors of the logistic regression method and the influence of the ML&DL method were not significantly different. The accuracy and performance of the ML&DL method in predicting the fate of MMPRT were comparable to those of the logistic regression method. Therefore, this ML&DL algorithm could potentially predict the outcome of the MMRPT in various fields and situations. Furthermore, our method could be efficiently implemented in current clinical practice. MDPI 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8304966/ /pubmed/34359308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jae-Ik
Kim, Dong-Hyun
Yoo, Hyun-Jin
Choi, Han-Gyeol
Lee, Yong-Seuk
Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title_full Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title_fullStr Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title_short Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
title_sort comparison of the predicting performance for fate of medial meniscus posterior root tear based on treatment strategies: a comparison between logistic regression, gradient boosting, and cnn algorithms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359308
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225
work_keys_str_mv AT leejaeik comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms
AT kimdonghyun comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms
AT yoohyunjin comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms
AT choihangyeol comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms
AT leeyongseuk comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms