Cargando…
Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms
This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225 |
_version_ | 1783727461509365760 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jae-Ik Kim, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Jin Choi, Han-Gyeol Lee, Yong-Seuk |
author_facet | Lee, Jae-Ik Kim, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Jin Choi, Han-Gyeol Lee, Yong-Seuk |
author_sort | Lee, Jae-Ik |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the affecting factors for the surgery were evaluated using statistical analysis. Second, AI technology was introduced using X-ray and MRI. Finally, the accuracy and prediction performance were compared between ML&DL and logistic regression methods. Affecting factors of the logistic regression method corresponded well with the feature importance of the six top-ranked factors in the ML&DL method. There was no significant difference when comparing the accuracy, F1-score, and error rate between ML&DL and logistic regression methods (accuracy = 0.89 and 0.91, F1 score = 0.89 and 0.90, error rate = 0.11 and 0.09; p = 0.114, 0.422, and 0.119, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) values showed excellent test quality for both ML&DL and logistic regression methods (AUC = 0.97 and 0.94, respectively) in the evaluation of prediction performance (p = 0.289). The affecting factors of the logistic regression method and the influence of the ML&DL method were not significantly different. The accuracy and performance of the ML&DL method in predicting the fate of MMPRT were comparable to those of the logistic regression method. Therefore, this ML&DL algorithm could potentially predict the outcome of the MMRPT in various fields and situations. Furthermore, our method could be efficiently implemented in current clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8304966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83049662021-07-25 Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms Lee, Jae-Ik Kim, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Jin Choi, Han-Gyeol Lee, Yong-Seuk Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to validate the accuracy and prediction performance of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and logistic regression methods in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT). From July 2003 to May 2018, 640 patients diagnosed with MMPRT were included. First, the affecting factors for the surgery were evaluated using statistical analysis. Second, AI technology was introduced using X-ray and MRI. Finally, the accuracy and prediction performance were compared between ML&DL and logistic regression methods. Affecting factors of the logistic regression method corresponded well with the feature importance of the six top-ranked factors in the ML&DL method. There was no significant difference when comparing the accuracy, F1-score, and error rate between ML&DL and logistic regression methods (accuracy = 0.89 and 0.91, F1 score = 0.89 and 0.90, error rate = 0.11 and 0.09; p = 0.114, 0.422, and 0.119, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) values showed excellent test quality for both ML&DL and logistic regression methods (AUC = 0.97 and 0.94, respectively) in the evaluation of prediction performance (p = 0.289). The affecting factors of the logistic regression method and the influence of the ML&DL method were not significantly different. The accuracy and performance of the ML&DL method in predicting the fate of MMPRT were comparable to those of the logistic regression method. Therefore, this ML&DL algorithm could potentially predict the outcome of the MMRPT in various fields and situations. Furthermore, our method could be efficiently implemented in current clinical practice. MDPI 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8304966/ /pubmed/34359308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Jae-Ik Kim, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Jin Choi, Han-Gyeol Lee, Yong-Seuk Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title | Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title_full | Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title_short | Comparison of the Predicting Performance for Fate of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Based on Treatment Strategies: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting, and CNN Algorithms |
title_sort | comparison of the predicting performance for fate of medial meniscus posterior root tear based on treatment strategies: a comparison between logistic regression, gradient boosting, and cnn algorithms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8304966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejaeik comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms AT kimdonghyun comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms AT yoohyunjin comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms AT choihangyeol comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms AT leeyongseuk comparisonofthepredictingperformanceforfateofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottearbasedontreatmentstrategiesacomparisonbetweenlogisticregressiongradientboostingandcnnalgorithms |