Cargando…

Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study

Background: Single patient- and context-related factors have been associated with admission decisions to intensive care. How physicians weigh various factors and integrate them into the decision-making process is not well known. Objectives: First, to determine which patient- and context-related fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cullati, Stéphane, Perneger, Thomas V., Scherer, Fabienne, Nendaz, Mathieu, Escher, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143068
_version_ 1783727511314628608
author Cullati, Stéphane
Perneger, Thomas V.
Scherer, Fabienne
Nendaz, Mathieu
Escher, Monica
author_facet Cullati, Stéphane
Perneger, Thomas V.
Scherer, Fabienne
Nendaz, Mathieu
Escher, Monica
author_sort Cullati, Stéphane
collection PubMed
description Background: Single patient- and context-related factors have been associated with admission decisions to intensive care. How physicians weigh various factors and integrate them into the decision-making process is not well known. Objectives: First, to determine which patient- and context-related factors influence admission decisions according to physicians, and their agreement about these determinants; and second, to examine whether there are differences for patients with and without advanced disease. Method: This study was conducted in one tertiary hospital. Consecutive ICU consultations for medical inpatients were prospectively included. Involved physicians, i.e., internists and intensivists, rated the importance of 13 factors for each decision on a Likert scale (1 = negligible to 5 = predominant). We cross-tabulated these factors by presence or absence of advanced disease and examined the degree of agreement between internists and intensivists using the kappa statistic. Results: Of 201 evaluated patients, 105 (52.2%) had an advanced disease, and 140 (69.7%) were admitted to intensive care. The mean number of important factors per decision was 3.5 (SD 2.4) for intensivists and 4.4 (SD 2.1) for internists. Patient’s comorbidities, quality of life, preferences, and code status were most often mentioned. Inter-rater agreement was low for the whole population and after stratifying for patients with and without advanced disease. Kappa values ranged from 0.02 to 0.34 for all the patients, from −0.05 to 0.42 for patients with advanced disease, and from −0.08 to 0.32 for patients without advanced disease. The best agreement was found for family preferences. Conclusion: Poor agreement between physicians about patient- and context-related determinants of ICU admission suggests a lack of explicitness during the decision-making process. The potential consequences are increased variability and inequity regarding which patients are admitted. Timely advance care planning involving families could help physicians make the decision most concordant with patient preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83051752021-07-25 Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study Cullati, Stéphane Perneger, Thomas V. Scherer, Fabienne Nendaz, Mathieu Escher, Monica J Clin Med Article Background: Single patient- and context-related factors have been associated with admission decisions to intensive care. How physicians weigh various factors and integrate them into the decision-making process is not well known. Objectives: First, to determine which patient- and context-related factors influence admission decisions according to physicians, and their agreement about these determinants; and second, to examine whether there are differences for patients with and without advanced disease. Method: This study was conducted in one tertiary hospital. Consecutive ICU consultations for medical inpatients were prospectively included. Involved physicians, i.e., internists and intensivists, rated the importance of 13 factors for each decision on a Likert scale (1 = negligible to 5 = predominant). We cross-tabulated these factors by presence or absence of advanced disease and examined the degree of agreement between internists and intensivists using the kappa statistic. Results: Of 201 evaluated patients, 105 (52.2%) had an advanced disease, and 140 (69.7%) were admitted to intensive care. The mean number of important factors per decision was 3.5 (SD 2.4) for intensivists and 4.4 (SD 2.1) for internists. Patient’s comorbidities, quality of life, preferences, and code status were most often mentioned. Inter-rater agreement was low for the whole population and after stratifying for patients with and without advanced disease. Kappa values ranged from 0.02 to 0.34 for all the patients, from −0.05 to 0.42 for patients with advanced disease, and from −0.08 to 0.32 for patients without advanced disease. The best agreement was found for family preferences. Conclusion: Poor agreement between physicians about patient- and context-related determinants of ICU admission suggests a lack of explicitness during the decision-making process. The potential consequences are increased variability and inequity regarding which patients are admitted. Timely advance care planning involving families could help physicians make the decision most concordant with patient preferences. MDPI 2021-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8305175/ /pubmed/34300235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143068 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cullati, Stéphane
Perneger, Thomas V.
Scherer, Fabienne
Nendaz, Mathieu
Escher, Monica
Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title_full Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title_short Physicians’ Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study
title_sort physicians’ views and agreement about patient- and context-related factors influencing icu admission decisions: a prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34300235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143068
work_keys_str_mv AT cullatistephane physiciansviewsandagreementaboutpatientandcontextrelatedfactorsinfluencingicuadmissiondecisionsaprospectivestudy
AT pernegerthomasv physiciansviewsandagreementaboutpatientandcontextrelatedfactorsinfluencingicuadmissiondecisionsaprospectivestudy
AT schererfabienne physiciansviewsandagreementaboutpatientandcontextrelatedfactorsinfluencingicuadmissiondecisionsaprospectivestudy
AT nendazmathieu physiciansviewsandagreementaboutpatientandcontextrelatedfactorsinfluencingicuadmissiondecisionsaprospectivestudy
AT eschermonica physiciansviewsandagreementaboutpatientandcontextrelatedfactorsinfluencingicuadmissiondecisionsaprospectivestudy