Cargando…

IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY

High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deteriorat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glumac, Sandro, Kardum, Goran, Karanović, Nenad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588732
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18
_version_ 1783727557901811712
author Glumac, Sandro
Kardum, Goran
Karanović, Nenad
author_facet Glumac, Sandro
Kardum, Goran
Karanović, Nenad
author_sort Glumac, Sandro
collection PubMed
description High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deterioration that markedly impair the patient quality of life. Therefore, a substantial number of papers have focused on this complex postoperative complication, however, with limited achievement in clarifying it. The underlying mechanisms of POCD development and contributing factors are still unclear. A significant issue in POCD research is the lack of uniformity in defining cognitive impairment among investigators, including unique terminology of cognitive changes, a battery of appropriate neuropsychological tests, timing of assessment, and statistical approach. Thus, the aim of this review is to address the difficulties in establishing POCD definition, with inclusion of specific recommendations based on recent publications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83053682021-09-28 IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY Glumac, Sandro Kardum, Goran Karanović, Nenad Acta Clin Croat Reviews High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deterioration that markedly impair the patient quality of life. Therefore, a substantial number of papers have focused on this complex postoperative complication, however, with limited achievement in clarifying it. The underlying mechanisms of POCD development and contributing factors are still unclear. A significant issue in POCD research is the lack of uniformity in defining cognitive impairment among investigators, including unique terminology of cognitive changes, a battery of appropriate neuropsychological tests, timing of assessment, and statistical approach. Thus, the aim of this review is to address the difficulties in establishing POCD definition, with inclusion of specific recommendations based on recent publications. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8305368/ /pubmed/34588732 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Reviews
Glumac, Sandro
Kardum, Goran
Karanović, Nenad
IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title_full IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title_fullStr IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title_full_unstemmed IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title_short IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
title_sort is it time to redefine cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery? the importance of methodological consistency
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588732
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18
work_keys_str_mv AT glumacsandro isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency
AT kardumgoran isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency
AT karanovicnenad isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency