Cargando…
IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY
High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deteriorat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588732 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18 |
_version_ | 1783727557901811712 |
---|---|
author | Glumac, Sandro Kardum, Goran Karanović, Nenad |
author_facet | Glumac, Sandro Kardum, Goran Karanović, Nenad |
author_sort | Glumac, Sandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deterioration that markedly impair the patient quality of life. Therefore, a substantial number of papers have focused on this complex postoperative complication, however, with limited achievement in clarifying it. The underlying mechanisms of POCD development and contributing factors are still unclear. A significant issue in POCD research is the lack of uniformity in defining cognitive impairment among investigators, including unique terminology of cognitive changes, a battery of appropriate neuropsychological tests, timing of assessment, and statistical approach. Thus, the aim of this review is to address the difficulties in establishing POCD definition, with inclusion of specific recommendations based on recent publications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8305368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83053682021-09-28 IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY Glumac, Sandro Kardum, Goran Karanović, Nenad Acta Clin Croat Reviews High incidence and significance of repercussions on patient health and healthcare system make postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) a major problem following cardiac surgery. POCD frequency drops over time since surgery and its occurrence are related to different aspects of cognitive deterioration that markedly impair the patient quality of life. Therefore, a substantial number of papers have focused on this complex postoperative complication, however, with limited achievement in clarifying it. The underlying mechanisms of POCD development and contributing factors are still unclear. A significant issue in POCD research is the lack of uniformity in defining cognitive impairment among investigators, including unique terminology of cognitive changes, a battery of appropriate neuropsychological tests, timing of assessment, and statistical approach. Thus, the aim of this review is to address the difficulties in establishing POCD definition, with inclusion of specific recommendations based on recent publications. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8305368/ /pubmed/34588732 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Glumac, Sandro Kardum, Goran Karanović, Nenad IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title | IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title_full | IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title_fullStr | IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title_full_unstemmed | IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title_short | IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY? THE IMPORTANCE OF METHODOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY |
title_sort | is it time to redefine cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery? the importance of methodological consistency |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588732 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glumacsandro isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency AT kardumgoran isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency AT karanovicnenad isittimetoredefinecognitivedysfunctionaftercardiacsurgerytheimportanceofmethodologicalconsistency |