Cargando…
Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT
BACKGROUND: Glass ionomer cements (GIC) have been considered the top option to restore primary teeth by dentists. The most common supply forms are hand mixed and encapsulated GIC. There is a lack of information about the impact of different GIC supply forms on restoration survival. METHODS: This ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0 |
_version_ | 1783727592967241728 |
---|---|
author | Oliveira, Rodolfo de Carvalho Camargo, Lucila Basto Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Pontes, Laura Regina Antunes Olegário, Isabel Cristina Gimenez, Thais Pássaro, Ana Laura Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Braga, Mariana Minatel Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Raggio, Daniela Prócida |
author_facet | Oliveira, Rodolfo de Carvalho Camargo, Lucila Basto Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Pontes, Laura Regina Antunes Olegário, Isabel Cristina Gimenez, Thais Pássaro, Ana Laura Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Braga, Mariana Minatel Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Raggio, Daniela Prócida |
author_sort | Oliveira, Rodolfo de Carvalho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Glass ionomer cements (GIC) have been considered the top option to restore primary teeth by dentists. The most common supply forms are hand mixed and encapsulated GIC. There is a lack of information about the impact of different GIC supply forms on restoration survival. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial compared the survival rate of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations in primary molars using two glass ionomer cements versions: hand-mixed (H/M) and encapsulated (ENC) after 24 months. Children aged 3–10 years who presented dentin caries lesions in primary molars were selected at School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil. They were randomly assigned to groups: H /M (Fuji IX(®), GC Europe) or ENC (Equia Fill(®), GC Europe). The occurrence of restoration failure was evaluated by two blinded and calibrated examiners. The analyses were performed in Stata 13 (StataCorp, USA). To evaluate the primary outcome (restoration survival), we performed a survival analysis. Additionally an intention to treat (ITT) analysis were done at 24 months of follow-up. Cox Regression with shared frailty was performed to assess association between restoration failure and independent variables (α = 5%). RESULTS: A total of 324 restorations were performed in 145 children. The survival for H/M group was 58.2% and 60.1% for ENC, with no difference (p = 0.738). Occlusoproximal restorations had lower survival rate when compared to occlusal ones (HR = 3.83; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate in primary molars is not influenced by the different supply forms of GIC. Also, occlusoproximal restorations present reduced performances when compared to occlusal cavities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov on 10/15/2014 under protocol (NCT 02274142). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8305516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83055162021-07-28 Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT Oliveira, Rodolfo de Carvalho Camargo, Lucila Basto Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Pontes, Laura Regina Antunes Olegário, Isabel Cristina Gimenez, Thais Pássaro, Ana Laura Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Braga, Mariana Minatel Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Raggio, Daniela Prócida BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Glass ionomer cements (GIC) have been considered the top option to restore primary teeth by dentists. The most common supply forms are hand mixed and encapsulated GIC. There is a lack of information about the impact of different GIC supply forms on restoration survival. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial compared the survival rate of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations in primary molars using two glass ionomer cements versions: hand-mixed (H/M) and encapsulated (ENC) after 24 months. Children aged 3–10 years who presented dentin caries lesions in primary molars were selected at School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil. They were randomly assigned to groups: H /M (Fuji IX(®), GC Europe) or ENC (Equia Fill(®), GC Europe). The occurrence of restoration failure was evaluated by two blinded and calibrated examiners. The analyses were performed in Stata 13 (StataCorp, USA). To evaluate the primary outcome (restoration survival), we performed a survival analysis. Additionally an intention to treat (ITT) analysis were done at 24 months of follow-up. Cox Regression with shared frailty was performed to assess association between restoration failure and independent variables (α = 5%). RESULTS: A total of 324 restorations were performed in 145 children. The survival for H/M group was 58.2% and 60.1% for ENC, with no difference (p = 0.738). Occlusoproximal restorations had lower survival rate when compared to occlusal ones (HR = 3.83; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate in primary molars is not influenced by the different supply forms of GIC. Also, occlusoproximal restorations present reduced performances when compared to occlusal cavities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov on 10/15/2014 under protocol (NCT 02274142). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0. BioMed Central 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8305516/ /pubmed/34301217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oliveira, Rodolfo de Carvalho Camargo, Lucila Basto Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Pontes, Laura Regina Antunes Olegário, Isabel Cristina Gimenez, Thais Pássaro, Ana Laura Tedesco, Tamara Kerber Braga, Mariana Minatel Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Raggio, Daniela Prócida Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title | Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title_full | Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title_fullStr | Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title_short | Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT |
title_sort | survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated gic: 24 months rct |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveirarodolfodecarvalho survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT camargolucilabasto survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT novaestatianefernandes survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT ponteslaurareginaantunes survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT olegarioisabelcristina survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT gimenezthais survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT passaroanalaura survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT tedescotamarakerber survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT bragamarianaminatel survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT mendesfaustomedeiros survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct AT raggiodanielaprocida survivalrateofprimarymolarrestorationsisnotinfluencedbyhandmixedorencapsulatedgic24monthsrct |