Cargando…

Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobrolińska, Magdalena M., Gąsior, Paweł M., Pociask, Elżbieta, Smolka, Grzegorz, Ochala, Andrzej, Wojakowski, Wojciech, Roleder, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148
_version_ 1783727595882283008
author Dobrolińska, Magdalena M.
Gąsior, Paweł M.
Pociask, Elżbieta
Smolka, Grzegorz
Ochala, Andrzej
Wojakowski, Wojciech
Roleder, Tomasz
author_facet Dobrolińska, Magdalena M.
Gąsior, Paweł M.
Pociask, Elżbieta
Smolka, Grzegorz
Ochala, Andrzej
Wojakowski, Wojciech
Roleder, Tomasz
author_sort Dobrolińska, Magdalena M.
collection PubMed
description Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study was to compare QFR results with integrated IVUS-NIRS results acquired simultaneously in the same coronary lesion. We retrospectively enrolled 66 patients in whom 66 coronary lesions were assessed by NIRS-IVUS and QFR. Lesions were divided into two groups based on QFR results as QFR-positive group (QFR ≤ 0.8) or QFR-negative group (QFR > 0.8). Based on ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off values of minimal lumen area (MLA), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis for predicting QFR ≤ 80 were 2.4 (AUC 0.733, 95%CI 0.61, 0.834), 1.6 (AUC 0.768, 95%CI 0.634, 0.872) and 59.5 (AUC 0.918, 95%CI 0.824, 0.971), respectively. In QFR-positive lesions, the maxLCBI(4mm) was significantly higher than in QFR-negative lesions (450.12 ± 251.0 vs. 329.47 ± 191.14, p = 0.046). The major finding of the present study is that values of IVUS-MLA, IVUS-MLD and percent diameter stenosis show a good efficiency in predicting QFR ≤ 0.80. Moreover, QFR-positive lesions are characterized by higher maxLCBI(4mm) as compared to the QFR-negative group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83055292021-07-25 Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. Gąsior, Paweł M. Pociask, Elżbieta Smolka, Grzegorz Ochala, Andrzej Wojakowski, Wojciech Roleder, Tomasz Diagnostics (Basel) Article Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study was to compare QFR results with integrated IVUS-NIRS results acquired simultaneously in the same coronary lesion. We retrospectively enrolled 66 patients in whom 66 coronary lesions were assessed by NIRS-IVUS and QFR. Lesions were divided into two groups based on QFR results as QFR-positive group (QFR ≤ 0.8) or QFR-negative group (QFR > 0.8). Based on ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off values of minimal lumen area (MLA), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis for predicting QFR ≤ 80 were 2.4 (AUC 0.733, 95%CI 0.61, 0.834), 1.6 (AUC 0.768, 95%CI 0.634, 0.872) and 59.5 (AUC 0.918, 95%CI 0.824, 0.971), respectively. In QFR-positive lesions, the maxLCBI(4mm) was significantly higher than in QFR-negative lesions (450.12 ± 251.0 vs. 329.47 ± 191.14, p = 0.046). The major finding of the present study is that values of IVUS-MLA, IVUS-MLD and percent diameter stenosis show a good efficiency in predicting QFR ≤ 0.80. Moreover, QFR-positive lesions are characterized by higher maxLCBI(4mm) as compared to the QFR-negative group. MDPI 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8305529/ /pubmed/34201889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dobrolińska, Magdalena M.
Gąsior, Paweł M.
Pociask, Elżbieta
Smolka, Grzegorz
Ochala, Andrzej
Wojakowski, Wojciech
Roleder, Tomasz
Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title_full Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title_fullStr Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title_short Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
title_sort performance of integrated near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound (nirs-ivus) system against quantitative flow ratio (qfr)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148
work_keys_str_mv AT dobrolinskamagdalenam performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT gasiorpawełm performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT pociaskelzbieta performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT smolkagrzegorz performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT ochalaandrzej performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT wojakowskiwojciech performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr
AT roledertomasz performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr