Cargando…
Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148 |
_version_ | 1783727595882283008 |
---|---|
author | Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. Gąsior, Paweł M. Pociask, Elżbieta Smolka, Grzegorz Ochala, Andrzej Wojakowski, Wojciech Roleder, Tomasz |
author_facet | Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. Gąsior, Paweł M. Pociask, Elżbieta Smolka, Grzegorz Ochala, Andrzej Wojakowski, Wojciech Roleder, Tomasz |
author_sort | Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study was to compare QFR results with integrated IVUS-NIRS results acquired simultaneously in the same coronary lesion. We retrospectively enrolled 66 patients in whom 66 coronary lesions were assessed by NIRS-IVUS and QFR. Lesions were divided into two groups based on QFR results as QFR-positive group (QFR ≤ 0.8) or QFR-negative group (QFR > 0.8). Based on ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off values of minimal lumen area (MLA), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis for predicting QFR ≤ 80 were 2.4 (AUC 0.733, 95%CI 0.61, 0.834), 1.6 (AUC 0.768, 95%CI 0.634, 0.872) and 59.5 (AUC 0.918, 95%CI 0.824, 0.971), respectively. In QFR-positive lesions, the maxLCBI(4mm) was significantly higher than in QFR-negative lesions (450.12 ± 251.0 vs. 329.47 ± 191.14, p = 0.046). The major finding of the present study is that values of IVUS-MLA, IVUS-MLD and percent diameter stenosis show a good efficiency in predicting QFR ≤ 0.80. Moreover, QFR-positive lesions are characterized by higher maxLCBI(4mm) as compared to the QFR-negative group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8305529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83055292021-07-25 Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. Gąsior, Paweł M. Pociask, Elżbieta Smolka, Grzegorz Ochala, Andrzej Wojakowski, Wojciech Roleder, Tomasz Diagnostics (Basel) Article Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new opportunity to analyze functional stenosis during invasive coronary angiography. Together with a well-known intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a new player in the field, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), it is gaining a lot of interest. The aim of the study was to compare QFR results with integrated IVUS-NIRS results acquired simultaneously in the same coronary lesion. We retrospectively enrolled 66 patients in whom 66 coronary lesions were assessed by NIRS-IVUS and QFR. Lesions were divided into two groups based on QFR results as QFR-positive group (QFR ≤ 0.8) or QFR-negative group (QFR > 0.8). Based on ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off values of minimal lumen area (MLA), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent diameter stenosis for predicting QFR ≤ 80 were 2.4 (AUC 0.733, 95%CI 0.61, 0.834), 1.6 (AUC 0.768, 95%CI 0.634, 0.872) and 59.5 (AUC 0.918, 95%CI 0.824, 0.971), respectively. In QFR-positive lesions, the maxLCBI(4mm) was significantly higher than in QFR-negative lesions (450.12 ± 251.0 vs. 329.47 ± 191.14, p = 0.046). The major finding of the present study is that values of IVUS-MLA, IVUS-MLD and percent diameter stenosis show a good efficiency in predicting QFR ≤ 0.80. Moreover, QFR-positive lesions are characterized by higher maxLCBI(4mm) as compared to the QFR-negative group. MDPI 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8305529/ /pubmed/34201889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dobrolińska, Magdalena M. Gąsior, Paweł M. Pociask, Elżbieta Smolka, Grzegorz Ochala, Andrzej Wojakowski, Wojciech Roleder, Tomasz Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title | Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title_full | Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title_fullStr | Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title_short | Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) |
title_sort | performance of integrated near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound (nirs-ivus) system against quantitative flow ratio (qfr) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34201889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobrolinskamagdalenam performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT gasiorpawełm performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT pociaskelzbieta performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT smolkagrzegorz performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT ochalaandrzej performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT wojakowskiwojciech performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr AT roledertomasz performanceofintegratednearinfraredspectroscopyandintravascularultrasoundnirsivussystemagainstquantitativeflowratioqfr |