Cargando…

Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure

OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the influence of surgical techniques adopted to avoid suture line disruption, periprosthetic leakage, patch dislodgement, pericardial patch aneurysm formation, and the long-term stability of aortic root enlargement (ARE) during aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: One...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar, Singh, Sukhjeet, George, Niwin, Hasija, Suruchi, Sankhyan, Lakshmikumari, Pandey, Niraj Nirmal, Sengupta, Sanjoy, Kalaivani, Mani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34317974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.017
_version_ 1783727641097928704
author Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar
Singh, Sukhjeet
George, Niwin
Hasija, Suruchi
Sankhyan, Lakshmikumari
Pandey, Niraj Nirmal
Sengupta, Sanjoy
Kalaivani, Mani
author_facet Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar
Singh, Sukhjeet
George, Niwin
Hasija, Suruchi
Sankhyan, Lakshmikumari
Pandey, Niraj Nirmal
Sengupta, Sanjoy
Kalaivani, Mani
author_sort Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the influence of surgical techniques adopted to avoid suture line disruption, periprosthetic leakage, patch dislodgement, pericardial patch aneurysm formation, and the long-term stability of aortic root enlargement (ARE) during aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients undergoing AVR or combined aortic and mitral valve replacements with Nicks' posterior ARE between 1997 and 2019 underwent long-term echocardiographic and angio-computed tomographic evaluation. Age was 11-72 years (AVR: median, 30; interquartile range, 21-47 years; AVR and mitral valve replacement: median, 27.5; interquartile range, 20-37.5 years). The aortotomy was closed using autologous pericardial patch and Teflon-buttressed sutures. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 1.7% (n = 2), with 4 (3.5%) late deaths. At a mean follow-up of 123.11 ± 77.67 months, the survival probability from Kaplan–Meier was 93.25 ± 0.03%. No cases of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) were observed, and only 2 patients had moderate PPM. Median aortic root diameters at the level of sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction were 32 (29-35) mm and 33 (30-36) mm, respectively, at discharge, and were 33 (30-36) mm, and 33 (31-37) mm, respectively, at latest follow-up, with no cases of late pericardial patch aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: ARE is a safe adjunct to AVR in patients with a small aortic annulus to prevent PPM. Retention of a pericardial collar and Teflon-buttressed sutures is an expedient, safe, and effective technique in reducing bleeding at the enlarged ventriculo-aortic junction. Autologous pericardial patch aortoplasty is not associated with late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83057242021-07-26 Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar Singh, Sukhjeet George, Niwin Hasija, Suruchi Sankhyan, Lakshmikumari Pandey, Niraj Nirmal Sengupta, Sanjoy Kalaivani, Mani JTCVS Tech Adult: Aortic Valve OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the influence of surgical techniques adopted to avoid suture line disruption, periprosthetic leakage, patch dislodgement, pericardial patch aneurysm formation, and the long-term stability of aortic root enlargement (ARE) during aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients undergoing AVR or combined aortic and mitral valve replacements with Nicks' posterior ARE between 1997 and 2019 underwent long-term echocardiographic and angio-computed tomographic evaluation. Age was 11-72 years (AVR: median, 30; interquartile range, 21-47 years; AVR and mitral valve replacement: median, 27.5; interquartile range, 20-37.5 years). The aortotomy was closed using autologous pericardial patch and Teflon-buttressed sutures. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 1.7% (n = 2), with 4 (3.5%) late deaths. At a mean follow-up of 123.11 ± 77.67 months, the survival probability from Kaplan–Meier was 93.25 ± 0.03%. No cases of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) were observed, and only 2 patients had moderate PPM. Median aortic root diameters at the level of sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction were 32 (29-35) mm and 33 (30-36) mm, respectively, at discharge, and were 33 (30-36) mm, and 33 (31-37) mm, respectively, at latest follow-up, with no cases of late pericardial patch aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: ARE is a safe adjunct to AVR in patients with a small aortic annulus to prevent PPM. Retention of a pericardial collar and Teflon-buttressed sutures is an expedient, safe, and effective technique in reducing bleeding at the enlarged ventriculo-aortic junction. Autologous pericardial patch aortoplasty is not associated with late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm formation. Elsevier 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8305724/ /pubmed/34317974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.017 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Aortic Valve
Chowdhury, Ujjwal Kumar
Singh, Sukhjeet
George, Niwin
Hasija, Suruchi
Sankhyan, Lakshmikumari
Pandey, Niraj Nirmal
Sengupta, Sanjoy
Kalaivani, Mani
Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title_full Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title_fullStr Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title_full_unstemmed Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title_short Early evaluation of the aortic root after Nicks' procedure
title_sort early evaluation of the aortic root after nicks' procedure
topic Adult: Aortic Valve
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34317974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.017
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhuryujjwalkumar earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT singhsukhjeet earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT georgeniwin earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT hasijasuruchi earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT sankhyanlakshmikumari earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT pandeynirajnirmal earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT senguptasanjoy earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure
AT kalaivanimani earlyevaluationoftheaorticrootafternicksprocedure