Cargando…

Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is of great concern among MDR bacteria and rapid and reliable in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing methods are extremely necessary. Colistin is, in many cases, among the limited useful alternatives for these isolates. Unfortunately, only a few reliable in vit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-López, Javier, Cortés-Cuevas, José Luis, Díez-Aguilar, María, López-Causapé, Carla, Cantón, Rafael, Morosini, María Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab104
_version_ 1783727644434497536
author Sánchez-López, Javier
Cortés-Cuevas, José Luis
Díez-Aguilar, María
López-Causapé, Carla
Cantón, Rafael
Morosini, María Isabel
author_facet Sánchez-López, Javier
Cortés-Cuevas, José Luis
Díez-Aguilar, María
López-Causapé, Carla
Cantón, Rafael
Morosini, María Isabel
author_sort Sánchez-López, Javier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is of great concern among MDR bacteria and rapid and reliable in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing methods are extremely necessary. Colistin is, in many cases, among the limited useful alternatives for these isolates. Unfortunately, only a few reliable in vitro methods are validated for testing susceptibility to colistin. Although EUCAST and CLSI recommend broth microdilution (BMD) as the standard method for antibiotic susceptibility testing, this method is not routinely performed in microbiology laboratories. However, some commercial products based upon BMD have tested well and offer consistent results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the colorimetric Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas Test (RPPT) (ELITech Microbiology, France). METHODS: Eighty-seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains, prospectively collected in two microbiology laboratories exhibiting either susceptibility or various degrees of multidrug resistance, including to colistin, were used. Different susceptibility testing methods were simultaneously performed and compared with reference BMD and interpreted using 2020 EUCAST criteria. RESULTS: Results indicate an essential agreement (EA) of 97.7% for RPPT while the other tests did not reach 90% of EA [66.7% MicroScan, 63.2% Etest (bioMérieux, France) and 60.9% other MIC Test Strips (MTS, Liofilchem, Italy)]. The categorical agreement was 98.9% for RPPT, 87.4% for MTS, 85.1% for Etest and 64.4% for MicroScan. CONCLUSIONS: The RPPT was able to accurately detect both colistin-susceptible and -resistant isolates within 4 h, offering a rapid alternative for a prompt decision about the inclusion of this antibiotic in a patient’s treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8305739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83057392021-07-26 Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance Sánchez-López, Javier Cortés-Cuevas, José Luis Díez-Aguilar, María López-Causapé, Carla Cantón, Rafael Morosini, María Isabel JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is of great concern among MDR bacteria and rapid and reliable in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing methods are extremely necessary. Colistin is, in many cases, among the limited useful alternatives for these isolates. Unfortunately, only a few reliable in vitro methods are validated for testing susceptibility to colistin. Although EUCAST and CLSI recommend broth microdilution (BMD) as the standard method for antibiotic susceptibility testing, this method is not routinely performed in microbiology laboratories. However, some commercial products based upon BMD have tested well and offer consistent results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the colorimetric Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas Test (RPPT) (ELITech Microbiology, France). METHODS: Eighty-seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains, prospectively collected in two microbiology laboratories exhibiting either susceptibility or various degrees of multidrug resistance, including to colistin, were used. Different susceptibility testing methods were simultaneously performed and compared with reference BMD and interpreted using 2020 EUCAST criteria. RESULTS: Results indicate an essential agreement (EA) of 97.7% for RPPT while the other tests did not reach 90% of EA [66.7% MicroScan, 63.2% Etest (bioMérieux, France) and 60.9% other MIC Test Strips (MTS, Liofilchem, Italy)]. The categorical agreement was 98.9% for RPPT, 87.4% for MTS, 85.1% for Etest and 64.4% for MicroScan. CONCLUSIONS: The RPPT was able to accurately detect both colistin-susceptible and -resistant isolates within 4 h, offering a rapid alternative for a prompt decision about the inclusion of this antibiotic in a patient’s treatment. Oxford University Press 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8305739/ /pubmed/34316679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab104 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Sánchez-López, Javier
Cortés-Cuevas, José Luis
Díez-Aguilar, María
López-Causapé, Carla
Cantón, Rafael
Morosini, María Isabel
Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title_full Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title_fullStr Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title_short Evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas test in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
title_sort evaluation of rapid polymyxin pseudomonas test in clinical pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with various degrees of multidrug resistance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8305739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab104
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezlopezjavier evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance
AT cortescuevasjoseluis evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance
AT diezaguilarmaria evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance
AT lopezcausapecarla evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance
AT cantonrafael evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance
AT morosinimariaisabel evaluationofrapidpolymyxinpseudomonastestinclinicalpseudomonasaeruginosaisolateswithvariousdegreesofmultidrugresistance